Mafiascum.net

Blake, I think that what you're doing is very detrimental to town's chances of winning and I think that would be true even if you were correct on either myself or Quest being scum. I don't know for sure whether you're doing it because you're anxious town or because you're scum but you're heavily disrupting town's ability to work together.

i feel like blake was trying manipulate me into SRing quest and it doesnt sit right w me

HURT: Blake Belladonna
HURT: Weiss Schnee
HURT: Skygazer
HURT: northsidegal
HURT: Sashaddin

I'm just going to sheep my strongest townread when it's time to actually go through with a coalition.

I'll be around if anyone needs anything specific.

Jesus fucking christ.

I'm not sure what to tell you?

Just forget it, it's incredibly disappointing; that's all.

So, are northsidegal and PvTurist going to flake?

In post 282, Tim Goodman wrote:So, are northsidegal and PvTurist going to flake?

Are people more inclined to flake as town or as scum?

nsg better not flake i signed up because of her lol

You didn't sign up because of me?

I signed up because of Northsidegal too!

In post 206, Sashaddin wrote:

In post 99, implosion wrote:Math Fact: if a single town member refuses to enter coalitions, it becomes 350% more difficult for the town to form a successful coalition!

isn't math wonderful?

Math is wonderful, I'm a math teacher.
I don't understand your computation, I end up with 250% or 3.5x more. Unless this is what you meant? Anyways, it makes it a whole lot harder.

Phoneposting so probably gonna either spam a bit or get bored and stop

Replace “350% more” with “350% as”; I misspoke.

In post 287, implosion wrote:Replace “350% more” with “350% as”; I misspoke.

Bah, no biggie, I graded around a hundred exams yesterday, seems I was still in work mode when I came home!

In post 209, Sashaddin wrote:

In post 205, Quest wrote:

In post 203, Sashaddin wrote:HURT: Blake Belladona, Implosion
After reading through I'm not vouching for those two right now.

Y not (why not)?

Implosion: The general tone, a little of OMGUS for voting me, and I feel he's posting a lot for show (LAMIST?)

“Posting a lot for show” and lamist are absurd accusations given my iso is full of reads and content.

In post 207, Sashaddin wrote:

In post 205, Quest wrote:

In post 203, Sashaddin wrote:HURT: Blake Belladona, Implosion
After reading through I'm not vouching for those two right now.

Y not (why not)?

Blake: 90, 102, 152
I'm not saying I'm scumreading him for those posts, but if he wants out of the coalition that's fine by me I'll find someone else.

In post 210, Sashaddin wrote:

In post 208, Quest wrote:That doesn't seem like a great reason.

You're probably right, but this is my first coalition game so it made sense in my head. What's wrong about this?

This sequence seems really defensive in a strange way that I want to call bad but am not sure of. Quest wasn’t calling the reasoning scummy, she was calling it “not great” I.e. wrong. And sashaddins first instinct to having reasoning be called wrong is to say that it probably is wrong but it made sense in his head and ask what’s wrong with it and I guess I’m confused by the phrasing more than the content looking at it more. Not sure I can quite explain atm but the sequence of thoughts is just odd.

There’s actually likely nothing here bc I think I misread it slightly but I’m not deleting this paragraph

In post 217, Quest wrote:

In post 100, Quest wrote:

In post 33, Quest wrote:

In post 29, Quest wrote:HEAL: Quest.
HEAL: Implosion.

HEAL: Tim Goodman.

HEAL: Blake.

VOTE: Sky.

HEAL: Sashaddin.

I've solved the game.

GG.

Do tell.

In post 285, Quest wrote:You didn't sign up because of me?

i mean did think it'd be cool to meet a new friend of anks!!

i also signed up to play with wagon and im salty that instead now i have to play with weiss

doesnt seem fair

In post 122, Tim Goodman wrote:I'm still not townreading Implosion. He feels more like he's trying to force himself to present as towny than that he's organically towny.
Not a strong read still but I feel like I should make that read known since several others seem to be townreading him.

In post 201, Tim Goodman wrote:I am strongly opposed to Implosion in coalition and somewhat opposed to Weiss in coalition.

This trajectory is starting to get on my nerves.

The best thing to do about it is probably talk more when we’re both in the thread and I’m not on phone but: your original read on me was reasonable. I think it’s totally reasonable to not-strongly not-townread me for that reason if you’re unfamiliar with my play. Where did this transition into strong opposition?

In post 225, Tim Goodman wrote:And like...

if he's town and those reads are all right, that means all scum are in Sashaddin, Weiss Schnee, and NSG. All lurking.

I'm not exactly enthusiastic that this game is THAT easy.

I’ve also been pretty unsold on Blake... and you forgot urist is in the game.

So I have 3 decent townreads. Sue me.

In post 231, Tim Goodman wrote:Dw skygazer, that's how I feel about Blake.

The irony.

In post 269, Quest wrote:HURT: Blake.

You're town, but I'm not wasting my time with you.

HEAL: Blake.

In post 289, implosion wrote:Do tell.

Maybe later, if I feel like it.

Actually, I'll do tell now. I won't go too much into it.

In post 214, Sashaddin wrote:

In post 211, Blake Belladonna wrote:What's pinging you about implosion's tone?

Pre-150, he's very confident in his posts, strong out of the gate. Very affirmative and ... heavy (can't find a way to say it otherwise ).
Post 150, I find him more wobbly and less decisive.
I don't know if you catch what I'm trying to explain.

This was a super townie post to me. I can see where he's getting that read from. The tone here is especially townie to me as well, it truly did feel like he believed in his reasoning.

Hrm.

Just popping in to say that I'm townreading that post mainly because I had a similar...ish trajectory to that posting and the way he phrased it felt like him trying to convey something he picked up on but didn't quite understand.

That type of posting is very hard to accurately fake as scum since there's a certain purity of it that is almost impossible to replicate.

In post 289, implosion wrote:And sashaddins first instinct to having reasoning be called wrong is to say that it probably is wrong but it made sense in his head and ask what’s wrong with it and I guess I’m confused by the phrasing more than the content looking at it more. Not sure I can quite explain atm but the sequence of thoughts is just odd.

English as second language here, so the phrasing might be inaccurately describing my ideas... But here is what I thought:

A) Someone says he wants out of the coalition
B) I remove said person thinking it's ok
C) Someone tells me it's not a goood reasoning
D1) I'm not a great player and this is my first coalition, so I'm probably wrong with my course of action
D2) I'm trying to get an answer on how this is a mistake.