Mafiascum.net

In post 272, Vorkuta wrote: a bunch of bullshit that doesn't even come close to acknowledging my problem.

k

In post 274, Vorkuta wrote:Pika hasn't said anything relevant so far (100% fluff) so idk

isn't that at least a slight cause for concern?

wooooow
just woooooow

Way to completely dismiss my entire case and stop engaging with that.
And of course you will still keep on trying to get me lynched even though you don't have any solid ground to push this from.
VOTE: nom x3
There's townie "ok fine I'll back off, let's look for another person to look for"
and there's
"I WILL GET THIS MISLYNCH AT ANY AND ALL COSTS"

I'm always willing to consider new and different approaches provided that there can be some sort of argument in favor for them, but THIS right here is truly disgusting.

I'd also argue that 33, 75 and 208 are game relevant posts

In post 276, Nero Cain wrote:isn't that at least a slight cause for concern?

-neither has skitter
-he's a troll/parody alt so dealing with this slot is going to be very fun. A pika lynch is a policy lynch tbh

hahahahaha

way to give up the lamist this early bud

Can't we all just get along and lynch teacher or DP?

I can get along just fine- nom x3 is just losing the ego battle here so idk what's up on that end.

In post 282, Vorkuta wrote:I can get along just fine- nom x3 is just losing the ego battle here so idk what's up on that end.

mine is bigger than yours

In post 279, Vorkuta wrote:neither has skitter

but the difference is that Skitter is not here and is v/la. DP is here and active lurking.

honestly? You both pale in comparison to the length and girth of my...ego.

now you're trying to make this personal

In post 283, nomnomnom wrote:mine is bigger than yours

The quality, in both formulation and actual solid logic, of your arguments has dropped off considerably since your initial "youre reaching" push on me, and now you're just openly admitting that you don't have a case on me anymore and this is crossed into personal territory.

I might be guilty of a bit of LAMIST (a thing I do as town anyway), but you're just flailing horribly

it's only personal if you are offended by the truth.

In post 244, Vorkuta wrote:Dilemma
>wanting to lynch a scummy playstyle
>knowing that town!X has this scummy playstyle

Applies to Buj as well

The meta would be way more telling than just the playstyle.

In post 262, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 261, Vorkuta wrote:I'm saying that "I'm not obligated to BUT I will anyway"
The 2 signals are not mutually exclusive, but COMPLEMENTARY

The literal definition of LAMIST but yeah I'm just having "leaps of logic" lmao

okay bud

You can't apply LAMIST when you're attacking them for scummy behavior, and they counter by saying it isn't scummy. That's not LAMIST, that's just defending yourself.

In post 287, Vorkuta wrote:

In post 283, nomnomnom wrote:mine is bigger than yours

The quality, in both formulation and actual solid logic, of your arguments has dropped off considerably since your initial "youre reaching" push on me, and now you're just openly admitting that you don't have a case on me anymore and this is crossed into personal territory.

I might be guilty of a bit of LAMIST (a thing I do as town anyway), but you're just flailing horribly

trying to escalate further with jokes is yikes

My case still stands, it's not because you write WoT constantly that it makes what I said any less true lol

In post 289, EvilDeanius wrote:You can't apply LAMIST when you're attacking them for scummy behavior, and they counter by saying it isn't scummy. That's not LAMIST, that's just defending yourself.

The LAMIST part is overly-justifying your vote then when questioned admitting you didn't need to do it. It's really obvious to me.
Then again nobody ever fucking listens to me so you know.

Page 12 ego game solve for the post-game brag:

Town: nomnom, cinnamon, skitter, dunn, nero cain, evil D, flubber, vork

Leftovers: urap, saladman, teacher, Pikachu

VOTE: Pikachu

In post 290, nomnomnom wrote:trying to escalate further with jokes is yikes

indeed- yikes

In post 290, nomnomnom wrote:My case still stands, it's not because you write WoT constantly that it makes what I said any less true lol

My walls of text... explicitly tell you why what you said is not true.. like what is this argument even

In post 291, nomnomnom wrote:The LAMIST part is overly-justifying your vote then when questioned admitting you didn't need to do it

I DO IT ALL THE TIME FFS

In post 293, Vorkuta wrote:I DO IT ALL THE TIME FFS

I INVOKE SELF META TO CLEAR MY SLOT ONCE AGAIN.

WHAT I SAY IS TRUTH NOW UNVOTE ME OR I VOTE YOU TO DEATH

what a pain in the ass

the worst is that I can already tell this is going to go nowhere and that I'm wasting my time

for fuck sake

-nom: "hey why do you justify your vote wtf that looks like reaching"
-vork: "it's not reaching, and my votes are always justified, even in other games"
-nom: "CAPS LOCK INTENSIFIES"

Hey @nom x3- I accept your consession

Let me hope that for once my scumread is followed by a wagon and not ignored and laughed to death first thanks

lololololololoololololololololol


oh I wasn't supposed to laugh was I?

In post 297, nomnomnom wrote:Let me hope that

for once my scumread

is followed by a wagon and not ignored and laughed to death

In post 294, nomnomnom wrote:I INVOKE SELF META

This display of double standards & Pot calling kettle black is also disgusting