Well, depends on the person somewhat, but basically agree here.In post 270, Zenith wrote:Effort isn't AI. Whether someone is extremely inactive, or going the extra mile putting in crazy effort, you'll find both town and scum everywhere throughout that spectrum.
Also I think jan overestimates the effort involved in "i know this persons townplay from before" somewhat.
However ya currently voting CJ for inctivity..
Or are ya saying ya think refusal to answer questions is scum indic?
This question mostly rhetorical, but ya can answer if ya like
u know, people keep saying this like it's obviously true.In post 271, Suspicious wrote:My issue with meta is that it is easily manipulated; what was once AI indicative of a player, once known in the meta mainstream, can then be used as a tactic for that player to disguise themselves.
No one actually has the ability to change their past at will.
Sure, people can play to their town-meta as scum.
Who in their right mind plays to their scum-meta as town?
Is it? I suppose people could be selective on what meta to presentThe same can be said for when meta is used against a player, as it is easy to make a meta argument that can fit a given narrative.
I'm not pushing Jam because of meta(anymore).Meta is argued over so often and contradicted; it has its merits to be sure, but it should never be the entire basis for a push.
I am pushing him because I think he lied.
also:
- not expressing things out of fear of being attacked is more of a scum-trait than town-trait.
- his only non-zen player-related thought happening to be about january, who I asked him about, seems like a very odd coincidence to originate from a townie analyzing a game. It's much easier explained by scum going:"tictac asked me about jan, better make something up"