Mafiascum.net

Saus what’s your read on kdca

the good part is the part where he asks kcdaspot why his post to content ratio is so bad

hey why is dolly’s claim scummy when it’s like
easily proved false
what does she gain by jokeserious claiming mason

or is that not really a thing you care about anymore

In post 277, Invisibility wrote:hey why is dolly’s claim scummy when it’s like
easily proved false
what does she gain by jokeserious claiming mason

gains this exact train of wifom

oh I guess

and the focus ends up on this, instead of the fact she's done literally nothing original all game, except the jokeclaim

I see what you mean

Kdca do you have a sr on a non-Jake player

I still got a read on alim

And a lot of do not like on ark.

I do believe invis has definitively prove them self not scummy

I kinda get why Dolly isn't on a the bad list.

She's not sucks thoo

*scums

In post 286, Kcdaspot wrote:I kinda get why Dolly isn't on a the bad list.

She's not sucks thoo

do you think she’s bad town or are you just not certain enough

at this point i can't read saus apart from "i am hugely worried about how i'm perceived" but they seem to think that's what the game is actually about for both alignments

don't know how to interpret it

Not certain. Nullish really

In post 289, rb wrote:at this point i can't read saus apart from "i am hugely worried about how i'm perceived" but they seem to think that's what the game is actually about for both alignments

don't know how to interpret it

Do you really think it wise to give that much attention to a what essentially is a null read?

In post 285, Kcdaspot wrote:I still got a read on alim

And a lot of do not like on ark.

I do believe invis has definitively prove them self not scummy

what is your read on alim? I couldn’t find it lol

In post 257, alimdia wrote:

In post 226, Joey_ wrote:

In post 202, alimdia wrote:I'm inclined to think that invis vs jake is actually SvS. That's pretty rare I must say, but it seems like some light bussing gone wrong.

thats a disgusting read and goes against your whole slip thought process and basically whatever you are doing rn still vote there

I have 0 idea what you just said. Can you reword

In post 225, Joey_ wrote:rb you should calm down a bit, honestly you are keeping scum from posting

hm....

i have been posting after work so I am tired and it's harder for me to articulate my ideas

The premise of your slip is that inv knew before hand that jake was town, so its a TMI SvsT slip. You can't push the slip wagon while calling both mafia, that was my point

In post 292, Invisibility wrote:

In post 285, Kcdaspot wrote:I still got a read on alim

And a lot of do not like on ark.

I do believe invis has definitively prove them self not scummy

what is your read on alim? I couldn’t find it lol

Half scums from the rvs vote onward

Hasn't really moved

In post 289, rb wrote:at this point i can't read saus apart from "i am hugely worried about how i'm perceived" but they seem to think that's what the game is actually about for both alignments

don't know how to interpret it

saus has been giving me vibes of open wolfing troll veteran or a genuine new player who flipped town but is being extremely self-conscious (trait I historically associate much more w/ scum than town)

Rex is an ok d4/d5 lynch

He's just not that well cooked yet

Put em on the smoker for a while and we"'ll get DAT juicy read yet

I am pretty sure he's already well done

In post 291, Kcdaspot wrote:

In post 289, rb wrote:at this point i can't read saus apart from "i am hugely worried about how i'm perceived" but they seem to think that's what the game is actually about for both alignments

don't know how to interpret it

Do you really think it wise to give that much attention to a what essentially is a null read?

yes i do think it's wise to try and figure out people's alignments

you don't?

hey everyone

watch this

VOTE: kcdaspot