Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:40 am
VOTE: AaronFrost
His posts read very forced. His progression on creature also sucks.
His posts read very forced. His progression on creature also sucks.
What is “enough to vote” by your criteria?In post 276, DogWatch wrote:I'm always slow to vote beyond rvs, just a really slow starter in general
Tbh I don't have any major scumleans at the moment, creature is the only one whose really pinged me at all but not enough to vote yet
Can you elaborate?In post 275, Amrun wrote:VOTE: AaronFrost
His posts read very forced. His progression on creature also sucks.
Elaborate re: creature?In post 279, DogWatch wrote:Can you elaborate?In post 275, Amrun wrote:VOTE: AaronFrost
His posts read very forced. His progression on creature also sucks.
not necessarily but post 176 seems inconsistent with his scumreading of AF earlier. Maybe it's nothing, but I want to hear from him.In post 280, Amrun wrote:Is non transparent reads scummy?
Do you agree that AF had any sort of point against Creature though? Since you word it as an offense? I do see what you're saying about AF tbfIn post 281, Amrun wrote:He calls out creature for something and then commits the exact same offense very quickly by voting Iconeum, who is, IMO, lower hanging fruit than Creature.
I do, I just think scum would be more worried about how they appear and that Creature will sort himself as the game goes on. In other words, Creature seems like he doesn’t gaf and was posting whatever popped into his mind and probably forgot about AF in that moment.In post 283, DogWatch wrote:Do you agree that AF had any sort of point against Creature though? Since you word it as an offense? I do see what you're saying about AF tbfIn post 281, Amrun wrote:He calls out creature for something and then commits the exact same offense very quickly by voting Iconeum, who is, IMO, lower hanging fruit than Creature.
Yes. It’s been seen a few times, most noticeably in the Mini Normal Musicals.In post 84, Menalque wrote:You have a cologne gambit?In post 66, Pretentious wrote:Hey, Menalque, are you the type who wears cologne?
Don’t worry, guys, I’m not pulling my cologne gambit, I’m generally just curious and we talked about him smelling.
Also, depends
Also hi
I don’t take stances, I just say my thoughts, and explain what I think is going on on a gamestate level.In post 288, Amrun wrote:Wow, Pretentious. Are there any stances you DO want to take?
Well I will say I do tend to go after newer/weaker players as scum, but I am not aware of Iconium so consider my vote on him to be healthy rather than intended to take down a mislynch bait player.In post 222, Menalque wrote:Hmm, okay
The reason is that icon is generally v mislynch baity and so pushing him early tends to ping me if it’s from someone who knows him who should know that him being scummy doesn’t necessarily mean he’s scum
Maybe.
You need to be careful though. Believing that will one day bite you in the ass and let those kind of players carry to endgame because they are too scummy to be scum.In post 225, Menalque wrote:Yes but I think it’s more true for some players than others, specifically for mislynch baity playersIn post 224, Something_Smart wrote:I mean this is true of everyone lol.In post 222, Menalque wrote:him being scummy doesn’t necessarily mean he’s scum
Who is creature? Thats the big question here, but I see where this guy is coming from.In post 230, AaronFrost wrote:In post 168, Creature wrote:Can we wagon someone?This entire sequence of posts is gross and inconsistent.In post 189, Creature wrote:I had a somewhat legit scumread on AF and probably still haveIn post 187, DogWatch wrote:Creature, what was this? Did you have a legit scumread on AF (which I don't see how) or were you just trying to get a wagon going?
If you're scumreading me right now then why didn't you mention me in 176? What's your reason for scumreading me?
Why Icon over creature? From a quick search of your iso, I think you have a better reason to vote creature for being "Bouncy"In post 233, AaronFrost wrote:VOTE: Iconeum
Even if Icon is considered 'mislynchable' I'm still going to push actions I find scummy and right now I'm not a fan of it giving Mena towncred for something he shouldn't get towncred for.
How many games have you played together?In post 234, Menalque wrote:Bc you are mislynch baity like nearly every game babeIn post 226, Iconeum wrote:why do you call me mislynch bait every single game
It wasn't serious, I'm not taking your comment nor Menalque's "Slip" seriously. Theres 3 mafia, I'm not believing anyone in this game actually believe there were only 2 mafia.Datisi wrote:What do you mean by uninformed? In what way? And I know this was said wrt alimdia, but I then assume your original vote wasn't serious?
I think its a good place to put my vote for now. His 149 bugs me and he hasn't done anything to make me think hes town yet.Datisi wrote:Is the Icon vote real? The explanation seemed a bit jokey.
If Icon is usually (60%) scum, then he is scum in this game is gamblers fallacy. Just like how I am always town in FG games and I am usually a lady/queen here.Datisi wrote:Btw it's not a gambler's fallacy.
I was just going to say this after reading 246.In post 248, Menalque wrote:I feel like you’re being kind of weirdly adversarial this game SS
Who is creature (Again)In post 255, DrDolittle wrote:i dont really get scum vibes from ico this game.
i could do aafrost
i might just roll through day 1 sheeping creature
You are not going to endgame if you make posts like this boon.In post 273, Pretentious wrote:I dangle myself out in front of scum like a piece of delicious cake.
I literally bait myself in being mislynched to scum.
I am mislynch bait.
That would be fine if your posts actually were saying something.In post 292, Pretentious wrote:I don’t take stances, I just say my thoughts, and explain what I think is going on on a gamestate level.In post 288, Amrun wrote:Wow, Pretentious. Are there any stances you DO want to take?