Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:32 am
Probably because you're scum
In post 174, gobbledygook wrote:BS do you have role info masons exist or was that just set up spec. I found the way you backtracked from that to be in genuine
Bugspray said he wasnt in a hood.In post 114, bugspray wrote:And I get the feeling that there might be masons
I think at least one of the neighbors is not town aligned, probably both.
I'm going to tinfoil predict that they are both sk
chamber wrote:You're MagnaOfIllusion aren't you? Ugh.
I don't see enough wall posts from yall.gobbledygook wrote:No that's meIn post 272, chamber wrote:You're MagnaOfIllusion aren't you? Ugh.
How the fuck does one think "hmmm theres a claim out that theres neighbors. I wonder if masons are in this game of 9 people?"In post 280, bugspray wrote:Fuck off I literally said I thought there might be masons"
Think vs know message to indicate I'm speculating
Might to really show I'm not sure of it
Why are y'all making such a big deal about it?
From my perspective you're a giant hypocrite when it comes to how you expect to be responded to and act and how you respond to things and act. Also from my perspective your reasons for suspecting me have been very inconsistent. When DrDoLittle confirmed that I'm just being myself, you dropped that point and moved on to others seemingly out of nowhere. You are hard confirmation biasing if not scum.In post 274, Wimpy wrote:why do you actually scum read me chamber?
This is a really deft defensive scum move. He yake this chance to ad hominem attack me who is pushing him to discredit me while also intentionally using the wrong pronoun and then incorrectly reframes my argument with a subtle strawmanIn post 283, Wimpy wrote:I am not sure bug is playing with a full deck. he essentially admitted he wants to pl me for posting too much
I don't think I have been a hypocrite at all. I actually have no clue what you are talking about. i have no expectation about how people should respond or act. If I did that i'd probably scum read half the game right now.In post 284, chamber wrote:From my perspective you're a giant hypocrite when it comes to how you expect to be responded to and act and how you respond to things and act
My reasons for scum reading you haven't changed so I don't know why you think that. Feel free to point out these inconsistencies if you actually think you have seen some.In post 284, chamber wrote:Also from my perspective your reasons for suspecting me have been very inconsistent.
No i haven'tIn post 284, chamber wrote:When DrDoLittle confirmed that I'm just being myself, you dropped that point
I get that criticism, i don't agree with it though. Pressuring others is probably a good idea. I have seen game where people death tunnel somebody and they usually end in town losses. People know where I stand on you and it seems nobody really agrees with me so that's another reason to move my vote. Parking on a wagon not likely to happen is useless, I want to look for other possible scum. Pressuring players is the best way to get people to contribute imoIn post 284, chamber wrote:moved on to others seemingly out of nowhere.
You are probably right. I probably am hard conf.biasing, but only because I haven't seen you do anything to improve your slot. It's part of the reason I am trying to move on. i figure if you and I stop bickering, you can actually take the game seriously.In post 284, chamber wrote:You are hard confirmation biasing
I mean I am voting DDLIn post 287, bugspray wrote:Then say it
Your reasons for why I am scumIn post 285, bugspray wrote:This is a really deft defensive scum move. He yake this chance to ad hominem attack me who is pushing him to discredit me while also intentionally using the wrong pronoun and then incorrectly reframes my argument with a subtle strawmanIn post 283, Wimpy wrote:I am not sure bug is playing with a full deck. he essentially admitted he wants to pl me for posting too much
A towny would not do grossly construe my words in good faith, I just don't think a townie would ever post this. It also reeks of omgus
In post 258, bugspray wrote:wimpy just sort of dominates the conversation and turned this thread into a Seinfeld episode.
this = I am posting too much.In post 259, bugspray wrote:Okay I think lynching wimpy first before slime is better because then there won't be so much spam distracting town so I'm gonna do this
why?In post 286, gobbledygook wrote:What if I said the scum was probably in {DDL, TheSlimer, Looker}
Operating under the assumption that the neighbors are town with how they interacted with one another.In post 292, Wimpy wrote:why?In post 286, gobbledygook wrote:What if I said the scum was probably in {DDL, TheSlimer, Looker}
I am also not sure you are playing with a full deck as well for suggesting theres a possibility of masons with an IC and neighborsIn post 285, bugspray wrote:This is a really deft defensive scum move. He yake this chance to ad hominem attack me who is pushing him to discredit me while also intentionally using the wrong pronoun and then incorrectly reframes my argument with a subtle strawmanIn post 283, Wimpy wrote:I am not sure bug is playing with a full deck. he essentially admitted he wants to pl me for posting too much
A towny would not do grossly construe my words in good faith, I just don't think a townie would ever post this. It also reeks of omgus
What would be your PoE and the reasonsIn post 294, Wimpy wrote:eh, don't really think any of those are good reasons but then again they all need to post more so can't really get reads on them.