Mafiascum.net

In post 193, SirCakez wrote:

In post 187, gobbledygook wrote:I’m legit worried that scum have like stupid high numbers to counteract this very townsided wincondition

possibly fake townslip

VOTE: sircakez

what a weird vote

can you get an avatar

Err yeah probably

You may have to wait until I get on my laptop tho

I don’t think it’s a weird vote

Why do you think it’s a weird vote?

Wonderwall can you sign your posts?

In post 272, jjh927 wrote:Declaring scumreads on paragon winners is not a crime

They haven't even done anything. NSG barely posted and RC is just doing RC stuff.

-bitmap

Sure but nobody's lynching your team mafia team rn

In post 278, Wonderwalll wrote:Why do you think it’s a weird vote?

I mean, is your reasoning that SirCakez is faking that gobbles is faking a townslip?

In post 279, SirCakez wrote:Wonderwall can you sign your posts?

Yeah I guess

-wall

In post 282, BBmolla wrote:

In post 278, Wonderwalll wrote:Why do you think it’s a weird vote?

I mean, is your reasoning that SirCakez is faking that gobbles is faking a townslip?

Gobbles could be faking a townslip

Gobbles could have really townslipped

Either way, it’s a bad metric to read him by and I don’t like that cakez is focussing on the “slip” element rather than anything else

Anything else to do with gobbles*

Like it’s a lowkey way to be active without doing much

-wall

can someone tell me what to do thanks

In post 284, Wonderwalll wrote:

In post 282, BBmolla wrote:

In post 278, Wonderwalll wrote:Why do you think it’s a weird vote?

I mean, is your reasoning that SirCakez is faking that gobbles is faking a townslip?

Gobbles could be faking a townslip

Gobbles could have really townslipped

Either way, it’s a bad metric to read him by and I don’t like that cakez is focussing on the “slip” element rather than anything else

How am I focusing on the slip
I made literally two posts addressing it
Also who is wonder and who is wall?

In post 284, Wonderwalll wrote:

In post 282, BBmolla wrote:

In post 278, Wonderwalll wrote:Why do you think it’s a weird vote?

I mean, is your reasoning that SirCakez is faking that gobbles is faking a townslip?

Gobbles could be faking a townslip

Gobbles could have really townslipped

Either way, it’s a bad metric to read him by and I don’t like that cakez is focussing on the “slip” element rather than anything else

still weird

any mastina thoughts?

In post 281, jjh927 wrote:Sure but nobody's lynching your team mafia team rn

we share a deep bond of friendship

-bitmap

Focusing on it maybe the wrong word

Calling it out when there was no need to is more what I went by that

Only to discredit him for what was basically an NAI post

Wall is mena

-wall

I think mastina is more likely to be scum than RC is atm but Ali’s advice for how to enjoy large themes was to stop taking them so seriously which means I’m not that interested in trying to sort out RC/mastina/NSG/jjh rn, maybe not today at all

-wall

I agree it's probably NAI but I still think it was worth pointing out. I wasn't trying to discredit gobble, if that's what it looked like.

In post 293, Menalque wrote:I think mastina is more likely to be scum than RC is atm but Ali’s advice for how to enjoy large themes was to stop taking them so seriously which means I’m not that interested in trying to sort out RC/mastina/NSG/jjh rn, maybe not today at all

-wall

I'm still waiting to see what's up with that whole bunch of RC posts that contextually are simultaneously directed at me and completely not applicable to me whatsoever

In post 187, gobbledygook wrote:I’m legit worried that scum have like stupid high numbers to counteract this very townsided wincondition

I can put your fears aside by explaining what I think the setup is, but I probably still shouldn't.

In post 181, SirCakez wrote:Who btw is just null rn all of this is well within both their town and scum meta

Actually by now I am well out of my practical scum range. Still in my scumrange, sure, but out of my practical scum range.

In post 232, Trojan Horses wrote:Mastina, on what basis did you bucket non-posters to weak town?

Glad you asked! It's easy. Quite simple, really.
I look at the people who haven't posted.
I analyze what I know about the players in question, and then I decide if their lack of posting is something more likely to be from town or scum or if it is null.
Then, among those that it is null for, I further sort them by using the tool of,

In post 238, SirCakez wrote:Jormen is posting elsewhere on site

That slot does have fairly high scum equity but like, it's not in my game so I can't vote it.

In post 269, We are not helping wrote:I'm not a big fan of mastina going straight towards both our paragons combined with this when they barely posted any content.

In post 280, We are not helping wrote:They haven't even done anything. NSG barely posted and RC is just doing RC stuff.

Precisely. It is specifically because they have barely posted any content, as paragons. That, plus gut on thinking how they'd approach as scum.

In post 287, DrDolittle wrote:can someone tell me what to do thanks

Vote Wonderwall.

In post 290, BBmolla wrote:any mastina thoughts?

Sure! I don't really care about the slip, Turkey's town regardless of it, but for what it's worth I think it's a real townslip anyway.

I meant thoughts on you by wonderwall

I feel like opinions on you are the most divisive thing about the game so it's strange that they didn't mention you

In post 296, mastina wrote:

In post 269, We are not helping wrote:I'm not a big fan of mastina going straight towards both our paragons combined with this when they barely posted any content.

In post 280, We are not helping wrote:They haven't even done anything. NSG barely posted and RC is just doing RC stuff.

Precisely. It is specifically because they have barely posted any content, as paragons. That, plus gut on thinking how they'd approach as scum.

I'll give them towards end of day to provide content.

-bitmap