Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 8:53 am
It's not RVS.In post 271, notscience wrote:Seconding the wtf on that rvs vote
It's not RVS.In post 271, notscience wrote:Seconding the wtf on that rvs vote
If you don’t think town hunting is a good start (strat? Start doesn’t make sense in this context), how can you confidently call out actions as not townhunting?In post 274, CooLDoG wrote:Well, I don't think that town hunting is a good start for town. However, because it is a meta strat, I don't find it to be initself scum indicative. However, your play is not simply town hunting. You are placing votes on people with little explanation and hiding behind "town hunting" to avoid explaining scum reads, this the vote....
Ok so what is it?In post 275, LicketyQuickety wrote:It's not RVS.In post 271, notscience wrote:Seconding the wtf on that rvs vote
Agar, no comment on this?In post 252, Espeonage wrote:I wanted to vote CD. Shrug, looped in notsci bc why not.
But like I haven't been ignoring the question. I've been ignoring the game period.
In post 280, gobbledygook wrote:Agar, no comment on this?In post 252, Espeonage wrote:I wanted to vote CD. Shrug, looped in notsci bc why not.
But like I haven't been ignoring the question. I've been ignoring the game period.
What has Espe done that has been Town outside of the claim? I'll wait.In post 279, AGar wrote:Ok so what is it?In post 275, LicketyQuickety wrote:It's not RVS.In post 271, notscience wrote:Seconding the wtf on that rvs vote
Yeah, that’s not really the type of comment i was looking for, but you got me, grammar nazi.In post 281, AGar wrote:In post 280, gobbledygook wrote:Agar, no comment on this?In post 252, Espeonage wrote:I wanted to vote CD. Shrug, looped in notsci bc why not.
But like I haven't been ignoring the question. I've been ignoring the game period.
Can you at least pretend to try?
I admit I missed it. I'll put it below for others to see.In post 257, renaissance wrote:In post 177, renaissance wrote:Why do you think of CoolDog's explanation that came in 82? Changed your mind?In post 69, PranaDevil wrote:Also not a fan of CooLDog attempting to frame Gryp. I want to hear a proper answer to #47 too.
It's a bullshit response to it. Clearly. I'd argue CooLDoG is trying to cast doubt on Gyp to allow an easy lynch himself.In post 82, CooLDoG wrote:Casting doubt on the claim to justify non-belief in it. Ergo, creating a reason to vote for a claimed power role.In post 47, gobbledygook wrote:CoolDog, could you explain how Gypx was angling to lynch a claimed PR here?In post 35, CooLDoG wrote:VOTE: vote: GypyxIn post 12, Gypyx wrote:Isn't the N1 vig claim a meme claim? It doesn't really look serious to me tbh
Angling for claimed PR lynch.
Erm... I'm attacking CooLDoG who did that. Please re-read.In post 270, AGar wrote:@Pranawhy are you pushing dogshit angles off of a meme claim to chain some lynches bud?
In post 264, Espeonage wrote:You weren't in my scum list friendo
Yeah... this isn't a good look at all.In post 265, notscience wrote:In post 37, Espeonage wrote:Currently I have cooldog and notsci as potential scum for going in to night prep immediately.
Sounds like a pretty good case to me, but I'm biased.In post 284, notscience wrote:Lickety is there any reason you’re being so condescending when literally all you’ve done is
Vote espe
Say it wasn’t rvs
Posit he hasn’t been town all game
Is there a point when you start playing or?
Why do Scum always over explain everything?In post 181, notscience wrote:It is. I can usually keep it up until like day 3, trying to mirror my town play but I usually just start lurking the longer the game goes and I’ve tried multiple times to change it but it’s just so hard lol. I’m waiting to get a chance at it again because I’d like to think I matured in my time away from the site and can overcome that now, but I haven’t had the chance to try it as I’m only playing one game at a time because I also work full time.
It does back me into corners when I draw like neighborizers because I’m basically forced into making a hood with the very people I’m most concerned about in the playlist.
Wut, like there is supposed to be a follow up here or what?In post 290, notscience wrote:Lol
Funny people don't live long.In post 292, notscience wrote:Nah I just think you’re funny
y no vote tho?In post 297, notscience wrote:Your stance is that I, as scum, draw attention to my buddies unsubstantiated read on me and repeatedly jump back to it- as does my other buddy.
Okay.