Mafiascum.net

In post 265, Porkens wrote:VOTE: exemplar. Who’s scummy now haha

You still havent answered my question

On a scale to 1-10 how juicy would you say you are?

In post 273, HoldenGolden wrote:I liked poopoo's intial case, but dislike both examplars and poopoo's reactions to each other afterwards for different reasons.

Farside, how did poopoo sound werid to you? What do you make of the two after their interaction

Popopopo's entrance seemed weird. He just comes in, ask if any scum caught and says "I'm town". I didn't take popopopo as a troll type so it just reads weird.
I found popopopo more town in the exchange. Things I found a few things scummy about Examplar, then when examplar calls out popopo for tunneling that was just a bs reaction. As soon as he's called out about his comments on popopopo he votes pox7 from post 195

*looks at exemplar's vote*

VOTE: exemplar

It's going to take a lot for me to move this.

Townlean on inutile. I find the handling of Monkeys posts townie in addtion of their offering to vote me in order to gague HEM intentions further

Welcome farside

In post 274, Exemplar wrote:inutile is town.
monkey is scummy, interrogation feels a little forced.
popo is VI.
Holden is a who knows. Maybe town.
gobble is scummy if that's all they have to say after coming back to several 1v1s/arguments.
farside might be town. I can understand her takes.
Porkens is scummy. The vote and previous double explanation without going back and checking.
bugspray is null.

VOTE: Porkens L-2

So gobble is scummy for coming back multiple times yet bugspray who is pretty similar (imo) is a null?

In post 277, HoldenGolden wrote:Townlean on inutile.

I find the handling of Monkeys posts townie in addtion of their offering to vote me in order to gague HEM intentions furthe

r

popopopopopopo wrote:Welcome farside

Hey pox7. Any thoughts on porkens?

In post 266, bugspray wrote:what the fuck I keep looking away for a few minutes to like 5 more pages

In post 121, bugspray wrote:VOTE: holdengolden
idk man u seeem pretty weird this game
and i never said i know who inutile is

In post 23, bugspray wrote:

In post 22, HoldenGolden wrote:

In post 19, bugspray wrote:

In post 18, HoldenGolden wrote:I mean I already know who you are regardless based on the bugsprayyyy post so

wait do you know that i know?
VOTE: holdengolden for not telling me

No, I don't need to know your mind to understand the engima which is inutile.

Bugs are you scum with HEM this game? Honesty is the best policy.

Honesty is the best policy? Then tell me who inutile is.

In post 19, bugspray wrote:

In post 18, HoldenGolden wrote:I mean I already know who you are regardless based on the bugsprayyyy post so

wait do you know that i know?
VOTE: holdengolden for not telling me

I could perhaps understand it if all bugs has done since RvS was say the game is moving too fast if that's all they did, but they confirmed their vote on me was no longer RVS.

Oops those weren't suppose to be posted.

@Farside I like the way they went about their counter interrogation on monkey. More importantly though, I think their proposal to vote me if monkey unvotes is town driven given how it seems to be used in order to gague HEM intentions (if he actually going about creating the wagons purely for reactions) while also not giving him control over my wagon.

Clearer? I'm half awake rn

Porkens his content is not too good but the obliviousnes in parts strikes me as a little town. Idk, porkens is a cypher.

I was irritated by popo's playstyle and it clouded my judgement. Looking at his meta objectively, and this aligns more with his town one.
Check how bugspray and gobbles usually play and you'll see why I treat them differently, Holden.

I'm on L-1.

HG rolled scum this game guys. Trust me.

In post 286, humaneatingmonkey wrote:HG rolled scum this game guys. Trust me.

Why?

If it's a meta read then explain it
If it's a content read then explain it.

So you are choosing that it's an actual read and not you doing a reaction test/lighting a fire under my ass like you claimed to inutile?

@exemplar let me find a gobbles game I guess then

I can do both, HG. I'm scumreading you and you're reacting, aren't you?

In post 288, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I can do both, HG. I'm scumreading you and you're reacting, aren't you?

Not given how you phrased it to inutile.

Now answer my question. What is your scumread on me based on.

You are obligated by question laws to answer my question now straight forward with no rebuttal question.

It's mostly intuition that I'm still trying to articulate.

In post 291, humaneatingmonkey wrote:It's mostly intuition that I'm still trying to articulate.

Articulate faster then.

At least try to explain it beyond gut feeling since you are projecting it as a slam dunk read.

I'm not under pressure and I like Exemplary's wagon and we already have the Porkens counterwagon. So maybe later. Meanwhile, I have my eye on you because I don't think a 1-on-1 is productive right now.

Do you scumread me, HG?

Do you townread Exemplary and Porkens, HG?

In post 294, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I'm not under pressure and I like Exemplary's wagon and we already have the Porkens counterwagon. So maybe later. Meanwhile, I have my eye on you because I don't think a 1-on-1 is productive right now.

Hold up.

You want to see my reaction. Here's my reaction. You havent responded about the looking into bugs/pork votes either point I raised. Pork is now a viable wagon. What do you make of his vote onto my wagon?

I think our 1v1 is very productive on my end. Why dont you think so?

Yes you have fallen to a scumlean.
No I do not town read either of them.

I don't really care whether you are very productive on your end. I don't think I'm going to be productive just picking what say apart. I'm probably gonna have a lot of false positives. Meanwhile, I like watching you interact with everything else. I don't want to take attention away from Exemplar and Porkens.

In post 298, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I don't think I'm going to be productive just picking what say apart.

EBWOP what you say apart. I like to add that you've shown to be eloquent and your words are not how I'm gonna collect information about you.

I think I'm going to be a lot more productive leaning back and watching everything that happens.