Mafiascum.net

Both you and 72 in the game this happened.

In post 850, Datisi wrote:

Official Vote Count 1.12

---

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Lynching

GeorgeBailey

(3): QuantumQuasar, 72offsuit, Poyzin

Quick

(2): NotAJumbleOfNumbers, Marashu

Marashu

(2): GeorgeBailey, LuckyLuciano

Not Voting

(2): teacher, Quick

Deadline:

(expired on 2020-06-02 18:20:00).

Mod notes:

• Searching for a replacement for NotAJumbleOfNumbers.
  
• Be civil.

[/area]

Re: Oh, 72o being in that game. I actually forgot he was in the game. Fair enough. Nonetheless, I still don't take my unvoting a slot I thought was town because I was certain another slot was mafia - and I was right - after you had a as proof that I don't prefer shorter D1s.

In post 274, LuckyLuciano wrote:They really don't, but okay, keep preaching that until you decide to actually play the game instead of continuing to try and snipe me in games so you can keep fascinating over your belief that I'm somebody that I'm not and finding new and unique reasons to vote me because of your hatred for that person.

You've been caught red handed. If this is the best defense of my case, I'm afraid I am going to have to...

VOTE: LL

P-Edit: None of that has anything to do with my case on you.

If I'm not mistaking, that's 4 votes. I have a TPR. Let's move on.

In post 278, LuckyLuciano wrote:I have a TPR. Let's move on.

Why should I believe you wouldn't say this as Scum?

In post 279, Nahdia wrote:Blopp (2): LuckyLuciano, 72offsuit

Also, this pretty much implicates 72 as well given 72 was the person who said LL tries to end the day early/doesn't like long days which I have proven that 72 knows this is not necessarily true.

So you are advocating eliminating a claimed power role day 1 when, in claiming, my slot because self-resolving as the game goes on anyway?

EBWOP: So you are advocating eliminating a claimed power role day 1 when, in claiming, my slot becomes self-resolving as the game goes on anyway?

In post 282, LuckyLuciano wrote:So you are advocating eliminating a claimed power role day 1 when, in claiming, my slot because self-resolving as the game goes on anyway?

No, I'm claiming my case is rock solid and you claiming PR doesn't dissuade me at all given that is exactly what you would do if you were Scum. Like, what is my incentive to believe you are telling the truth about being TPR?

In post 283, LuckyLuciano wrote:EBWOP: So you are advocating eliminating a claimed power role day 1 when, in claiming, my slot becomes self-resolving as the game goes on anyway?

Yeah. I've shown 72 blatantly lied about your meta because there was no way he could have known I would be entering the game to fact check that statement. You never denied such statement, but instead used it to push a no content slot, which is in direct opposition to what I pointed out in the game I listed where you actually unvoted a do-nothing slot.

Sure, keep saying that.

In post 286, LuckyLuciano wrote:Sure, keep saying that.

Like, do you have an argument here on why I am wrong? It seems like you are just trying to convince me I "could be wrong" without actually addressing anything I have said.

I'm not going to argue with you. Random nonsensical 1v1s are what you masturbate to. If the rest of the players in the game agree on eliminating a claimed TPR D1, so be it.

In post 288, LuckyLuciano wrote:I'm not going to argue with you. Random nonsensical 1v1s are what you masturbate to. If the rest of the players in the game agree on eliminating a claimed TPR D1, so be it.

I wouldn't want to 1v1 with me either.

Like, if you are mason with 72, just say so. If you are that would make sense. But it's not really my fault I caught 72 lying about your meta and thought he was Scum for it.

Anyways, if you ARE masons with 72, which I would say is about 50/50 at this point, then I would look at Raya36 for the blatant buddy attempt as well as Thirteen for them affirming LL's meta and budying me. I DON'T think Blopp flaking is actually AI.

UNVOTE:

To give Town a moment to process what just happened.

I am actually more sure thirteen is Scum than Raya36 at this point. Them being off wagon makes me feel weird about that slot.

Going to vote it.

VOTE: TheThirteenthJT

In post 288, LuckyLuciano wrote:I'm not going to argue with you. Random nonsensical 1v1s are what you masturbate to. If the rest of the players in the game agree on eliminating a claimed TPR D1, so be it.

Sorry but why does this post sound so defeated? Okay, removing a town PR would be a huge issue, however, it isn't liked you claimed an open town PR and didn't get counter claimed. I don't really want for you to claim, but I don't see a way for us to conftown you otherwise, I may be completely wrong on this but I have no idea when we don't even know what set up we're in.

Also, I have historically been really bad about outing Masons as Town. IDK why I do it. I just sense something is off and push it and then it comes out. It's really damn hard to stop myself to think if it's Masons or just Scum team. If LL claims mason, I will totally leave it alone and more or less believe the claim.

I'm not masons with 72o. I am not giving any more info about my role claim just to help mafia solve the setup. My slots self-resolves at this point. Either it becomes blatantly obvious I'm lying as the game goes on, or I'm telling the truth.

In post 296, LuckyLuciano wrote:I'm not masons with 72o. I am not giving any more info about my role claim just to help mafia solve the setup. My slots self-resolves at this point. Either it becomes blatantly obvious I'm lying as the game goes on, or I'm telling the truth.

If you are not dead D2 and there was a kill N1, you know where I will be voting. I would hope the rest of Town would be able to see this logic as well. In short, you don't make it to D3.

My reasons for NOT voting LL have diminished, so I would totally go back there. But let's see how people react to what happened before I get ahead of myself.

In post 260, LicketyQuickety wrote:And why has no one really said a single word about my case on 72/LL?

Because your case isn't a case and I'm not getting into a 100 post exchange with you.