Mafiascum.net

In post 222, Miccro Mask wrote:Although maybe you get some town points for misunderstanding what was happening with my role

But like you could be misunderstanding that as scum so... less townpoints

donc can you talk to me about this? it's lowkey reminding me of "this from datisi is reasonable but reasonable =/= town" for some reason from pyp

pedit: oh now that that's out of the way, do you have a read on me?

In post 269, skitter30 wrote:

In post 201, DkKoba wrote:bugspray are u usually hang-bait with the way you play bc my gut instinct is to insta vote u and not unvote

I'm actually getting townpings from him rn ...

Not sure who you are referring to since both of us go by they/them

In post 273, Miccro Mask wrote:

In post 271, skitter30 wrote:

In post 232, DkKoba wrote:DC im ngl your analysis on the worst feels ingenuine and made up. Please ellaborate on it.

i kinda agree tbh

How come?

Feels like a lot of words and an overexplanation almost? like it felt a bit hollow
i'm aware i'm not explaining this super well

In post 276, DkKoba wrote:

In post 269, skitter30 wrote:

In post 201, DkKoba wrote:bugspray are u usually hang-bait with the way you play bc my gut instinct is to insta vote u and not unvote

I'm actually getting townpings from him rn ...

Not sure who you are referring to since both of us go by they/them

my bad !!!
i meant bugspray, apologies

In post 253, bugspray wrote:ok datisi here's a town read: you the way you're approaching this is with the good logic

Being logical is not alignment indicative lol? I dont think datisi is scum but if this is how you are reading the game, then youre going to likely have bad reads

i dont understand the case on dsjtr. If someone who foses them could explain it id appreciate it

and re: bugspray: in decisively null on them rn bc the way they are playing is extemewly formulalic wrt how they are forming reads. Which is gimmicky but if anyone here has experience in sorting the bugspray slot itd.be appreciated.

Also literally everyone at this table has played with me at some point so i know yall cant be dishonest abt reading me .
(Dsjtsr i think i have only specced a game they played or subbed into their slot or smthing but regardless)

i don't think i have played with you, actually

dsjstr just feels a bit off

bugspray i think isn't super capable of changing reads on a whim in a way that belies an underlying thought process (i.e. they're getting new information and it's rapidly affecting their votes and reads in real-time but i think it's all coming from a consistent pov)

ive played 2 games with bugspray and both times he was town he basically was not existent

since he's posting here it probly means he's scum

oops I meant they were not existent

im bad with pronouns

ping DonC on the QoL Koba thing - he's not that hard to read as scum

btw for bugspray my ref games r

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=83365 24 Posts - spent more time playing chess in our PT than actually posting in the game, showed up after game was over and was confused why it was over.

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=83423 2 posts total - replaced out

VOTE: pooky

sorry you rolled scum again

In post 281, DkKoba wrote:if anyone here has experience in sorting the bugspray slot itd.be appreciated.

i have played 5 times with bugs, i've read them correctly 4/5 times (only screwed up in our first game)

in micro 932, i got to bugs!scum on page 4
in mobs9, i got to bugs!scum on page 1

bugs is town here

also that bugs read from pooky is very bad faith and pooky needs to eat rope, thank you

ok we'll see how good your read on bugs is

yeah, when you flip red today it's gonna spew them town

good joke

In post 289, Datisi wrote:bugs read from pooky is very bad faith

how is it bad faith?

In post 293, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 289, Datisi wrote:bugs read from pooky is very bad faith

how is it bad faith?

there is no actual deeper thought there

like you walk in, see us discussing bugs reads, saying why we think they're towny or not etc

without even trying to engage w anything you go "hurr durr in these two games i played with bugs they didn't post a lot and they were town, they're posting more here ergo scum!!!" it's the most surface level garbage

and whether your thought process is deep or shallow is alignment indicative?

also whether my thought process is surface or deep has nothing to do with "in good faith" which is a reference to whether you think I'm being honest or not about my assessment.

so I will re-iterate - what makes you say my read is "dishonest"

I can see why you would say it's "shallow or not deep" but show me how you get to dishonest.

yes

bc while i was modding the coalition i thought some of your arguments looked extremely shallow

and at the sime time (in that nomination game nahdia was modding) you made a post about someone scumslipping or something, and even though i had read none of that game at the time, i saw that post and thought i'd vote you for it because no way it's a real thought



ok scrolling hrough your ISO again, you did ask the worst "why" about bugs, but i think my point still stands you didn't engage with me/skitt, who were around and calling bugs towny so

pedit: hm, i may be somewhat interchangeably using deep/shallow with good/bad faith in this scenario

i think it's shallow because it is a very simple thought to make - playing differnently than these two town games, ergo scum

but the good/bad faith part comes more from not *trying* to make the read more profound, not asking people who thought bugs was town why that is, not asking about bugs's meta from people who obviously played with them etc

In post 297, Datisi wrote:ok scrolling hrough your ISO again, you did ask the worst "why" about bugs, but i think my point still stands you didn't engage with me/skitt, who were around and calling bugs towny so

i didnt even read what you and skitt wrote

ok

so how much of the game did you read and do you have any other thoughts on anything