Mafiascum.net

In post 242, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 235, PlusJOYED wrote:VOTE: taylor

care to elaborate?

what pob said basicially, you were contradicting yourself in the same post

In post 264, Not Known 15 wrote:

Princess Leia is being replaced.

???

I semi-forgot about this game.

I need to stop forgetting about stuff, can someone give me a tl;dr with the 6 new pages

also replacements don't just happen for inactivity, force-replacement is a way to solve a compromised slot but you're not supposed to discuss replacements anyways

so yeah hoping there won't be too much to catch up on

initial impressions

plusjoy is probably scum here like tbh this is a serious read, for 1) reasons I cant talk about and 2) town!plus does solve despite the solves might not being correct, plus is very agreeable here or am I just paranoid about you

don't like taylor's posting feels very forced

pob long is nullish scum to me, weird flexes and their posting confuses me

@mod v/la until Sunday

In post 278, shellyc wrote:

@Mod V/LA until Sunday EST

so yeah hoping there won't be too much to catch up on

sheep queen

plusjoy you posted after me. who sheeped who?

In post 282, shellyc wrote:plusjoy you posted after me. who sheeped who?

He's sheeping your VLA.

In post 277, shellyc wrote:I semi-forgot about this game.

I need to stop forgetting about stuff, can someone give me a tl;dr with the 6 new pages

also replacements don't just happen for inactivity, force-replacement is a way to solve a compromised slot but you're not supposed to discuss replacements anyways

We caught you in a scumslip.

VOTE: shelly

In post 259, Gypyx wrote:VOTE: Nosferatu

ok now put your mouth where ur money is

In post 258, Gypyx wrote:

In post 253, RedPanda wrote:I just don't see the reward of towncred which will evaporate as the game goes longer as enough incentive for scum to make that move.

I mean, you're kinda proving yourself wrong by giving BM towncred for doing that self-vote then right?

hold on, what?

In post 284, Titus wrote:

In post 277, shellyc wrote:I semi-forgot about this game.

I need to stop forgetting about stuff, can someone give me a tl;dr with the 6 new pages

also replacements don't just happen for inactivity, force-replacement is a way to solve a compromised slot but you're not supposed to discuss replacements anyways

We caught you in a scumslip.

VOTE: shelly

ik u probably will but pls eggsplain

In post 274, Vecna wrote:

In post 264, Not Known 15 wrote:

Princess Leia is being replaced.

WTF?

NO

...do you feel like if you'd got here earlier, this might not have happened? I hate being paired with a lurker as scum. Acknowledging your guilt is the first step.

In post 287, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 284, Titus wrote:

In post 277, shellyc wrote:I semi-forgot about this game.

I need to stop forgetting about stuff, can someone give me a tl;dr with the 6 new pages

also replacements don't just happen for inactivity, force-replacement is a way to solve a compromised slot but you're not supposed to discuss replacements anyways

We caught you in a scumslip.

VOTE: shelly

ik u probably will but pls eggsplain

When the time is right. Just get on.

In post 284, Titus wrote:

In post 277, shellyc wrote:I semi-forgot about this game.

I need to stop forgetting about stuff, can someone give me a tl;dr with the 6 new pages

also replacements don't just happen for inactivity, force-replacement is a way to solve a compromised slot but you're not supposed to discuss replacements anyways

We caught you in a scumslip.

VOTE: shelly

is there any reason to believe there was a compromised slot? Hopefully I'm toeing the line here - this is not me discussing replacements, but discussing someone else's weird speculation on replacements. Eh, I'll leave it there...

I'm pretty happy sending Princess Leia to trial today, so not particularly worried about replacing the slot.

i think aside from the slot being scummy anyway, the lack of appetite to jump on the wagon despite the easy hook of craplogic reads as more likely scum, and the weird reactions to the replace-out gives me the creeps too.

i need no further explanation VOTE: shellyc

i for one need further explanation, although i can kinda see how shelly and leia could be scum maybe?

Battle Mage, are you sure you're not sending her personality to the chair?

Taylor, the mystery of Day 1 Titus does not get explained until the moment comes. I know we haven't played together much so you get a pass for now.

oh im not saying i need an explanation now. im just saying im not sure im gonna sheep you without one

VOTE: Shelly

I trust Titus. Also going to be v/la this weekend. Be back on Monday.

In post 297, EddieFenix wrote:VOTE: Shelly

I trust Titus. Also going to be v/la this weekend. Be back on Monday.

the "lemme sheep something that isnt explained and then disappear for a few days" thing gives bad vibes, but i guess about half of this game so far is things i dont understand

Send to the Trial 1.4

Tayl0r Swift (5) pob long; Fidget; Princess Leia; RedPanda; PlusJOYED;

Not Voting (3) Marashu; Vecna; shellyc;

shellyc (3)Titus; Nosferatu; EddieFenix;

Princess Leia (2) Tayl0r Swift; Battle Mage;

Vecna (1) DrippingGoofball;

Nosferatu (1) Gypyx;

Fidget (0)

pob long (0)

Battle Mage (0)

RedPanda (0)

EddieFenix (0)

Marashu (0)

Gypyx (0)

PlusJOYED (0)

DrippingGoofball (0)

Titus (0)

With 15 alive, you need 8 to send someone to the trials with absolute majority vote, and 2 to send someone to the trials with relative majority vote at the end of the day. No Elimination is disabled.

Day 1 will end in (expired on 2020-09-25 11:00:00) or when someone has been sent to the trials by absolute majority.