Mafiascum.net

In post 237, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 236, DkKoba wrote:vp if ur pocketing me im allowing it... for now.

I figure one of us is eating the NK tonight after we yeet a scum, so I'm leaving any Koba paranoia I have for later, in the rare circumstance that doesn't happen.

This is not a townie mindset at all

In post 275, JacksonVirgo wrote:This is not a townie mindset at all

JV do you like bussing

math calling VP town is ????????

In post 276, shellyc wrote:

In post 275, JacksonVirgo wrote:This is not a townie mindset at all

JV do you like bussing

math calling VP town is ????????

That's a strange question, I used to bus all the time but I've realised that me doing that leads to me losing all the time so I stopped doing as much where I can help it, sometimes old habits die hard though.

Why's that?

In post 214, DkKoba wrote:id KINDA like to be able to have an actual read on u sometime in the near future

This seems kinda LAMIST but not at the same time.

In post 240, DrippingGoofball wrote:That's fine, we're eliminating you today to put you out of your misery.

This specifically makes me drop them to a SL/SR because only scum would benefit from having a locked lynch for the day.

In post 277, JacksonVirgo wrote:That's a strange question, I used to bus all the time but I've realised that me doing that leads to me losing all the time so I stopped doing as much where I can help it, sometimes old habits die hard though.

Why's that?

237 is scumslippy from the pov of having a nightkill and you're good scum and know to distance there imo

but eh. im too paranoid about you JV.

In post 267, DkKoba wrote:??? How lmfao

Discrediting

In post 270, DkKoba wrote:lol math frozen

Also discrediting

i'll vote in {VP, math} atm

VPs 237 is close to a scumslip imo and math randomly town on VP + really consensus-y play without furthering the game

Why do you think the discrediting comes from scum

Koba is too engaged and proactive to be scum at all

In post 280, shellyc wrote:

In post 277, JacksonVirgo wrote:That's a strange question, I used to bus all the time but I've realised that me doing that leads to me losing all the time so I stopped doing as much where I can help it, sometimes old habits die hard though.

Why's that?

237 is scumslippy from the pov of having a nightkill and you're good scum and know to distance there imo

but eh. im too paranoid about you JV.

Too lazy to search for that number so I'm linking it and responding afterwards 237

In post 280, shellyc wrote:

In post 277, JacksonVirgo wrote:That's a strange question, I used to bus all the time but I've realised that me doing that leads to me losing all the time so I stopped doing as much where I can help it, sometimes old habits die hard though.

Why's that?

237 is scumslippy from the pov of having a nightkill and you're good scum and know to distance there imo

but eh. im too paranoid about you JV.

So you're thinking that if I'm scum with them, they scum-slipped (I don't see how they scumslipped but it's scummy for sure) and I pointed that out to bus? Also don't be paranoid

In post 284, shellyc wrote:Why do you think the discrediting comes from scum

Koba is too engaged and proactive to be scum at all

unless this is actually in kobas scumrange im impressed. their reads vibe with my own, they are trying to further the game and constantly providing content

237 like. assumes koba will get nightkilled and is thinking from the pov of having a nightkill

im thinking. JV you usually have a "wow" factor as town and i dont really get that yet

In post 284, shellyc wrote:Why do you think the discrediting comes from scum

Koba is too engaged and proactive to be scum at all

I don't think I ever said that it came from scum, but you thinking that "they're too active to be scum" is a case you shouldn't ever be making as scum comes in all shapes and flavours.

In post 288, shellyc wrote:237 like. assumes koba will get nightkilled and is thinking from the pov of having a nightkill

im thinking. JV you usually have a "wow" factor as town and i dont really get that yet

I think that post is just straight plain LAMIST and pocketing koba. Also I'm either into a game fully or I'm kinda eh until I'm feeling more into the game and right now I'm kinda in the latter, no offense to anyone of course.

In post 275, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 237, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 236, DkKoba wrote:vp if ur pocketing me im allowing it... for now.

I figure one of us is eating the NK tonight after we yeet a scum, so I'm leaving any Koba paranoia I have for later, in the rare circumstance that doesn't happen.

This is not a townie mindset at all

The part where they're talking about eating the NK after they yeet a scum is them being incredibly confident that they're going to lynch scum D1, which is mathematically unlikely and Town hardly ever has that much confidence given Townies would know next to nothing outside of what their role is. Also the fact they're extremely confident that Koba or themselves is going to die at night, that means that they're incredibly confident that Koba is town and it's like scum is needing to pocket Koba but not push their full innocence as they might be a needed push later down the line and they don't want to put the full effort of having to develop a full ass 180 story.

In extension I believe that if VP flips scum, Koba is probably clear.

Also math is probably clear too

Shelly's tone is contrasting their scum tone from the large normal 229 and the mini normal bat game that just closed and I'm not sure if they can switch their meta up that good, otherwise they would have done so a lot earlier. Of course I think shelly and I will always have paranoia about the other lmfaoo

One thing that's pinging me is them WKing me a little bit but that's negligible and not a solid thing to read into. At least not for right now anyway.

In post 248, DkKoba wrote:VOTE: jackson ill explain in a bit when i can type it up. I believe i hinted at this move earlier but i was hoping to see more info before i transitioned over

In post 262, DkKoba wrote:Has to do with the reaction to being called on their rxn test

Lackluster when they were insinuating they had a much bigger case on me when they don't.

(I thought I sent this)

In post 296, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 248, DkKoba wrote:VOTE: jackson ill explain in a bit when i can type it up. I believe i hinted at this move earlier but i was hoping to see more info before i transitioned over

In post 262, DkKoba wrote:Has to do with the reaction to being called on their rxn test

Lackluster when they were insinuating they had a much bigger case on me when they don't.

(I thought I sent this)

thanks for scum claiming with this post

now i dont have to feel as paranoid abt ur slot

where ur vote at jackson