Mafiascum.net

In post 269, SirCakez wrote:no get back on the no elim wagon don't be distracted

I was never on it!

I saw gamma vent and voted. ﾍ(･_|

1-2 people will die every night anyway. Those tasks don't get completed.

So we're going to be picking up some extra tasks no matter what.

There will likely be enough tasks, scum don't need to avoid claiming them, that's not going to be a reliable tell.

There are 10 possible locations, it's not as trivial to keep everyone together as I think Flea and Cute Barking Doggy are thinking.

In post 258, Akarin wrote:Does anyone have post restrictions that will really strongly impair playing the game as normal on later days?

In post 273, Gamma Emerald wrote:How do scum “take” tasks

Dead crew tasks are made public, and people claim them.

In post 274, Haschel Cedricson wrote:

In post 270, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 250, Haschel Cedricson wrote:

In post 224, Flea The Magician wrote:So in theory it seems all tasks are a post restriction of some sort, I'd expect them all to be "short" style tasks.

O2 and Reactor MUST BE FIXED or imposters win.
Comms would be a global post restriction maybe?
Lights might hide kills?

...

What good can

possibly

come from this line of discussion?

People were asking, and I know some people enjoy setup spec.

Oh well if they enjoy it then I guess that's okay no wait the opposite of that.

And now people know why I was voted

In post 276, Akarin wrote:1-2 people will die every night anyway. Those tasks don't get completed.

So we're going to be picking up some extra tasks no matter what.

There will likely be enough tasks, scum don't need to avoid claiming them, that's not going to be a reliable tell.

There are 10 possible locations, it's not as trivial to keep everyone together as I think Flea and Cute Barking Doggy are thinking.

pooky has a plan for this so we move through some rooms each night

Would scum get new tasks that were distributed tho? Would that work as a PoE tool?

Okay
So that only happens once people die
It looks like everyone has 1 or 2 to start so everyone who started with 1 should be in the the initial pool of people taking tasks?

In post 0, Thestatusquo wrote:Anyone (even imposters) may claim tasks that are public information by PMing me.
Tasks claimed by mafia that are not completed are not counted against the town completing all of their tasks.

To me this is imposters claiming tasks essentially auto-complete them.

In post 28, TheGoldenParadox wrote:VOTE: gamma saw him vent

We have a winner y’all
TGP gets a free pass to D2

In post 268, Flea The Magician wrote:Uhm, this is odd. You're wanting other people to claim before you do, and you'll only claim once people are going to your rooms.

People are already claiming before I do, but I'm too lazy to compile Alisae's list for em

If we popcorn, I'll obviously comply with a popcorn but if I'm gonna end up alone I think it's potentially useful to have not claimed, but only in those circumstances.

I also want to encourgae Reck and the like to think about this and claim where they're going if they are going there with exactly 1 or 2 other people because otherwise they could be the bonus kills without it making it clear who even might have done it.

That seems like a good tool, sure there could be wifom, but in general scum wouldn't want to ask for the tasks.

Ah, I see what Cakez was getting at now.
That's one reason to solve.

i think it's most likely that Alisae is town and Titus is scum. Akarin town, Pooky town, Cakez town.

The other thing is we don't have a progress bar to know if a task is completed or not. But I'd imagine scum aren't willing to take on tasks because of this.

So trying to get the scummier players to take on tasks is definitely an advantage here.

In post 35, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:should we all claim task number? i see no reason not to

I have 2

I think it helps with allocating dead tasks so yeah
I have 1

@Flea

If someone claims to be done with their tasks (which is more obvious if we've claimed what we're doing) then under what circumstances do you imagine anyone refuses to take on a task?

In post 40, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:4->3->3 will mean all the rooms get visited at least once and each time it is visited there r lots of people in the rooms so no bonus NK for mafia?

Mafia get a NK if in a room with town
As such I’d prefer we keep groups as small as possible. Groups of 2 would be good but idk if that’s ENTIRELY feasible

why are there only two votes for no elim

In post 291, Akarin wrote:@Flea

If someone claims to be done with their tasks (which is more obvious if we've claimed what we're doing) then under what circumstances do you imagine anyone refuses to take on a task?

There is none, unless they're imposters.

In post 293, SirCakez wrote:why are there only two votes for no elim

In post 289, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 35, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:should we all claim task number? i see no reason not to

I have 2

I think it helps with allocating dead tasks so yeah
I have 1

electric?

In post 258, Akarin wrote:Does anyone have post restrictions that will really strongly impair playing the game as normal on later days?

It will be pretty annoying, but nothing that would impact the content

In post 295, Taly wrote:

In post 293, SirCakez wrote:why are there only two votes for no elim

@pooky/ali

lots of ppl havent claimed yet.

someone needs to start a popcorn