Mafiascum.net

In post 263, Nono wrote:

In post 119, Marky Mark wrote:

In post 118, Nono wrote:VOTE: jackson

Fancy explaining your train of thought?

mark's vote was a "poke" vote,, that's fine, the way jackson jumped on it, took it seriously felt bad, imo, excited, imo
jackson's weird, apparently, can't make up my mind

reading still

You've got a seriously warped vision of the current game-state.

In post 261, Horsewoman wrote:Pretty late for a naked vote here!

I was serious voting you before I jokingly voted Flea because of Noraa's "tell." But sure, leave that out.

jackson,, disagree with everything, or at least understand little, but enthusiasm is town

kbai

p-edit: excuse me, what!!

I agree with that, but while avoiding her she undermines her ability as a player

oh the vote was on you xD nvm

In post 270, Momrangal wrote:

In post 255, Guillotina wrote:

In post 249, Momrangal wrote:I think your read on Nora is off though

Why?

Its to my understanding that Nora is a cutesy overly excited kind of player... Like a puppy but in this game it doesn't seem over the top, and it feels like there's a level of focus and seriousness there. It's almost like she needs to actually some thinking in the game, and not make plays to redirect town votes, and plays, and cause havic.

There is something happening to cause this subtle shift in play at a subconscious level and it's that thing at that level that gives me my read on her

Oh that's interesting

In post 271, Momrangal wrote:I MEAN IF YOU WOULD JUST LET ME POST IT, IT DOESN'T EVEN CONCERN YOU

Please calm down I'm trying to solve

In post 277, Nono wrote:jackson,, disagree with everything, or at least understand little, but enthusiasm is town

kbai

p-edit: excuse me, what!!

What do you mean? Are you saying that I am disagreeing with everything but understanding little? I'm not really fully understanding your posts oof :c

In post 278, Momrangal wrote:I agree with that, but while avoiding her she undermines her ability as a player

What's this a reply to?

In post 282, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 277, Nono wrote:jackson,, disagree with everything, or at least understand little, but enthusiasm is town

kbai

p-edit: excuse me, what!!

What do you mean? Are you saying that I am disagreeing with everything but understanding little? I'm not really fully understanding your posts oof :c

EBWOP

jackson read: disagree with everything, or at least understand little, but enthusiasm is town

i'm weird, maybe,, can clarify, if asked

In post 274, JacksonVirgo wrote:That being said I do think Horse is scummy, I am not saying they aren't, I just think that specific piece of logic is wrong.

This. So many pedits

Oh I think I understand, you say I disagree with everything you say but maybe undertstand very little of what you're saying? That's probably it yeah,

lol no.... *sigh* it's okay, next time, maybe

No? Damn I have no idea then duder sorry

In post 273, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 262, Guillotina wrote:Ok. Horsewoman is definitely scum. She votes Toogeloo for a naked vote instead of me for tunneling her?

She is afraid to cast that vote on me because she knows im town and im right.



Luckily for HW, Noraa will get my vote if she does not tell me what “shading” Mark did. Ts ts ts.

That basis for lock-scumming Horse is kinda weak. Just because you SR them doesn't mean town!them would SR you back.

A town wouldn't be afraid to OMGUS me if my pushes on them seemed so aggressive. I was expecting her to woman up and say fuck you! And vote me, cause that's what I'd do. As town i wouldn't just ignore you and let you paint me as scum, if you are framing me, you are going down with me.

In post 270, Momrangal wrote:

In post 255, Guillotina wrote:

In post 249, Momrangal wrote:I think your read on Nora is off though

Why?

Its to my understanding that Nora is a cutesy overly excited kind of player... Like a puppy but in this game it doesn't seem over the top, and it feels like there's a level of focus and seriousness there. It's almost like she needs to actually some thinking in the game, and not make plays to redirect town votes, and plays, and cause havic.

There is something happening to cause this subtle shift in play at a subconscious level and it's that thing at that level that gives me my read on her

Meta can be faked. Noraa and I played together in a couple games recently and i've seen her how she can effortlessly change her meta to confuse players. This is why it is wiser to judge her solely on how she behaves in this game.

In post 289, Guillotina wrote:

In post 273, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 262, Guillotina wrote:Ok. Horsewoman is definitely scum. She votes Toogeloo for a naked vote instead of me for tunneling her?

She is afraid to cast that vote on me because she knows im town and im right.



Luckily for HW, Noraa will get my vote if she does not tell me what “shading” Mark did. Ts ts ts.

That basis for lock-scumming Horse is kinda weak. Just because you SR them doesn't mean town!them would SR you back.

A town wouldn't be afraid to OMGUS me if my pushes on them seemed so aggressive. I was expecting her to woman up and say fuck you! And vote me, cause that's what I'd do. As town i wouldn't just ignore you and let you paint me as scum, if you are framing me, you are going down with me.

They aren't you, not everyone is the same.

Mark is pretty similar to their recent town-games with me and they've been solving/mind-melding with me so I am confident enough to TR them as I have been, although I haven't seen any of their scum-games so I could be falling into a trap.

In post 266, Nono wrote:VOTE: flea

Elaborate and extrapolate ʕ•͡ω•ʔ

In post 276, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 261, Horsewoman wrote:Pretty late for a naked vote here!

I was serious voting you before I jokingly voted Flea because of Noraa's "tell." But sure, leave that out.

I honestly read your vote as calling me hot af.
Like I'm ever going to argue a compliment ʕ♡˙ᴥ˙♡ʔ

Seeing as we're dropping reads lists like they're hot potats.

Locktown:
Flea

Lockscum:
Everyone else.

ʕ ˵ ̿ ౪ ̿ ˵ ʔ

I think I just caught Noraa out in a lie. Context pending

In post 294, JacksonVirgo wrote:I think I just caught Noraa out in a lie. Context pending

ʕ ᵒ̌ ‸ ᵒ̌ ʔ

*waits impatiently while drinking tea*

In post 240, Noraa wrote:

In post 237, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 164, Noraa wrote:cko is special cuz their town meta matches up with votes not always making sense.

And yet I’ve been right in majority of my games

I agree with this to a certain extent. you have pretty good reads in Cakes large normal

This specific post, it's probably not AI but I feel it has to be at least somewhat. I just checked SirCakez Large Normal, and what she said is incorrect and I don't recall any other game with Noraa specifically in it that I had what they would call "pretty good reads" as I've replaced out of them in nearly all cases and the one I didn't I had wrong reads as it was early D1.

In the Large Normal they were referring to, I replaced out early D1. My reads were not anywhere near "pretty good" as the only scum I had "read" was Glitch, and I had them as a town-read. Noraa is either thinking of another game, which I want them to clarify immediately, or they're trying to pocket me.

Again, this isn't AI in itself if Noraa can back up her mistake otherwise I think it's a slip.

In post 260, Horsewoman wrote:

In post 258, DrippingGoofball wrote:I don't agree with HW's but it looks like it comes from town.

holy fuck what is your joindate is that real?

I don't know if I should be proud or embarrassed.

In post 275, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 263, Nono wrote:

In post 119, Marky Mark wrote:

In post 118, Nono wrote:VOTE: jackson

Fancy explaining your train of thought?

mark's vote was a "poke" vote,, that's fine, the way jackson jumped on it, took it seriously felt bad, imo, excited, imo
jackson's weird, apparently, can't make up my mind

reading still

You've got a seriously warped vision of the current game-state.

That ^^^^

In post 270, Momrangal wrote:Nora is a cutesy overly excited kind of player... Like a puppy but in this game it doesn't seem over the top, and it feels like there's a level of focus and seriousness there. It's almost like she needs to actually some thinking in the game, and not make plays to redirect town votes, and plays, and cause havic.

I see the exact opposite. Complete lack of focus, seriousness, or thinking, wrecking havoc.

When I was scum with her I was glad to let her roll the town with that BS. Here, not so much.