Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 6:24 am
It’s okay for early D1In post 264, Vaxkiller wrote:Also @titus, the mini wagon aint bad, it aint great but its not bad.
It’s okay for early D1In post 264, Vaxkiller wrote:Also @titus, the mini wagon aint bad, it aint great but its not bad.
etymonline.org wrote:host (n.1)
"person who receives guests," especially for pay, late 13c., from Old Frenchoste,hoste"guest, host, hostess, landlord" (12c., Modern Frenchhôte), from Latinhospitem(nominativehospes) "guest, stranger, sojourner, visitor (hence also 'foreigner')," also "host; one bound by ties of hospitality."
This appears to be from PIE*ghos-pot-, a compound meaning "guest-master" (compare Old Church Slavonicgospodi"lord, master," literally "lord of strangers"), from the roots "stranger, guest, host" and "powerful; lord." The etymological notion is of someone "with whom one has reciprocal duties of hospitality" [Watkins]. The biological sense of "animal or plant having a parasite" is from 1857.
Which instance of you voting are you stating you've applied enough pressure to make that person so uneasy they stopped posting in thread?In post 258, Titus wrote:I'm against the Mini wagon. I see no reason for it while I can't get a single vote on actual scummy people because after I call them out, they leave the thread.
Go shoot someone else's angles! Nah seriously, I'd like to hear this.In post 265, Titus wrote:I have angleshooty reasons to think cheeky may be scum here. But they're angleshooty so I am waiting to see on cheeky.
I get tmi feels from NEE.In post 267, Luca Blight wrote:This seems a little premature.In post 259, NorwegianboyEE wrote:No strong reactions to the Mini wagon makes me feel they could be town.
I don't really have a strong read on them otherwise.
If Mini were scum, what reactions would you expect following that wagon?
Yes, give in to the peer pressure.In post 284, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So because i’m not 100% doubling down on pushing a slot on early day 1 that’s barely posted when there are 20 slots to get reads on.
Cheeky claims i’m "tmi-ing"
Fucking lol.
They did this as scum in a game but that doesn’t really mean it’s their scum meta? Tbf i don’t know if they play like this when town as well. I’m not overly familiar with the difference between their town/scum play.In post 277, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really get why norway unvoted mini after stating that this is/was mini's scum meta.
I can’t think of any.In post 285, CheekyTeeky wrote:Are there any particular votes onto the wagon that you dislike?
I was being cheeky, I wasn't judging you as giving into pp. I feel fence sitty about you, I liked your push on Chk but didn't like the seemingly random jump off mini when they haven't really reacted to the wagon yet.In post 290, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m referring to your line: "give in to peer pressure".
Why?
I'm a slow starterIn post 150, Andresvmb wrote:This is all you have to say about the game so far plus?
andres putting more effort at the start here to make up for last game or because he's scum?In post 196, Andresvmb wrote:Last time we played, I could understand your POV. And you seemed more careful. Here you aren’t really being careful. I mean, you threw out a completely emotional reason to begin questioning my slot (based on literally faulty logic), and your focus seems overly narrow.
Whatever, just an early take. Some folks are already trying to sideline you by calling your approach superficial and what not. There’s probably something there, but you haven’t questioned it much.
Should I be? I had to check my ISO, but I have no mentions of her so idk why you’re singling out this thread
Which one are you leaning towards?In post 294, PlusJOYED wrote: andres putting more effort at the start here to make up for last game or because he's scum?
Duty, breach of duty, causation and damages.In post 279, chkflip wrote:Don't nobody ever push Mama.
Which instance of you voting are you stating you've applied enough pressure to make that person so uneasy they stopped posting in thread?In post 258, Titus wrote:I'm against the Mini wagon. I see no reason for it while I can't get a single vote on actual scummy people because after I call them out, they leave the thread.
You don't just get to cram words together because they sound good, lawyer, I need the evidence. WHERE ARE THE EXHIBITS!?
Samantha just finished rolling scum in Booneytunes. She peaced out rather than play scum again. #angleshootIn post 281, CheekyTeeky wrote:Go shoot someone else's angles! Nah seriously, I'd like to hear this.In post 265, Titus wrote:I have angleshooty reasons to think cheeky may be scum here. But they're angleshooty so I am waiting to see on cheeky.
Vax, you voted me before I even entered, I smell bs.
Why RVS someone who you always suspect?In post 293, PlusJOYED wrote:I'm a slow starterIn post 150, Andresvmb wrote:This is all you have to say about the game so far plus?
my rvs is probably VOTE: titus, they always seem scummy to me for some reason. I even vigged them n1 last game.
First things firstmostly, this is fun and lawyery and I absolutely asked for it but you completely passed over the initial question.In post 297, Titus wrote: Duty, breach of duty, causation and damages.
Duty to post and be readable and/or scumhunt
Breach of duty - Absence of scumhunting or responding to pressure
Causation - The absence causes the damages below
Damages - Inability to read the slot to determine motivation.
That's gross.In post 297, Titus wrote: Samantha just finished rolling scum in Booneytunes. She peaced out rather than play scum again. #angleshoot
Wait why does that matter?In post 297, Titus wrote: Why RVS someone who you always suspect?