Mafiascum.net

In post 270, boxxy wrote:

In post 256, Salsabil Faria wrote:

I think you changed your mind to avoid the pressure which is scummy imo.

UNVOTE: Seanzie

VOTE: boxxy

In my last game a troll poster posted _literally_ nothing. I feared that would be the case here with monkey. Then they posted a few legit posts so I moved on from that. If you find that scummy well then gg I guess.

In post 271, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: Pretty sure you posted monkey and cyrus as your 2 scum pile and voted Cyrus, so that's a bit more than favoring a policy lim. You also didn't propose it as a policy lim for later in the day, you said it was scum or something like that. I'm the one that brought it up as a policy lim and because I'm so against policy limming an "anti-town" player I deserve heaps and heaps of towncred

*trips*

Cyrus wasn't a policy lim, he was a scumread. Monkey was who I brought up for later in the day if they didn't add any value by then.

In post 274, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 270, boxxy wrote:In my last game a troll poster posted _literally_ nothing. I feared that would be the case here with monkey. Then they posted a few legit posts so I moved on from that. If you find that scummy well then gg I guess.

who is the troll poster

It was Not_Mafia

In post 275, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 270, boxxy wrote:

In post 256, Salsabil Faria wrote:

I think you changed your mind to avoid the pressure which is scummy imo.

UNVOTE: Seanzie

VOTE: boxxy

In my last game a troll poster posted _literally_ nothing. I feared that would be the case here with monkey. Then they posted a few legit posts so I moved on from that. If you find that scummy well then gg I guess.

Mention the posts you think are legit.

Welcome to the townblock, Salsabil Faria. There's a $250 membership fee. We accept Visa or Mastercard.

In post 277, boxxy wrote:

In post 274, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 270, boxxy wrote:In my last game a troll poster posted _literally_ nothing. I feared that would be the case here with monkey. Then they posted a few legit posts so I moved on from that. If you find that scummy well then gg I guess.

who is the troll poster

It was Not_Mafia

In post 250, cyrus62 wrote:

In post 246, humaneatingmonkey wrote:cyrus, what's your read on boxxy?

boxxy is a non funny guy who hates to joke and doesnt like trolls .

Can you point me to this?

In post 276, boxxy wrote:

In post 271, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: Pretty sure you posted monkey and cyrus as your 2 scum pile and voted Cyrus, so that's a bit more than favoring a policy lim. You also didn't propose it as a policy lim for later in the day, you said it was scum or something like that. I'm the one that brought it up as a policy lim and because I'm so against policy limming an "anti-town" player I deserve heaps and heaps of towncred

*trips*

Cyrus wasn't a policy lim, he was a scumread. Monkey was who I brought up for later in the day if they didn't add any value by then.

So not only do you not vote your scumread, you vote the guy who also scumreads your scumread because he won't tell you his super sikrit tell.
you rn [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_DCs29xw2A[/youtube]

oops

In post 277, boxxy wrote:It was Not_Mafia

How has that game changed you?

In post 269, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 247, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 241, humaneatingmonkey wrote:let's do boxxy guys. it's a good wagon

This is a super weird take? I've liked boxxy's posting a lot. I'm still trying to figure out nom though. I don't know if nom withholding the tell is inherently scummy but I'd really like to hear it if it's going to be justifying a scum read this early especially when it feels like cyrus town-slipped.

What is your preferred wagon atm?

I'm trying to sort nom right now because our views on boxxxy are so incongruent

In post 278, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 275, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 270, boxxy wrote:

In post 256, Salsabil Faria wrote:

I think you changed your mind to avoid the pressure which is scummy imo.

UNVOTE: Seanzie

VOTE: boxxy

In my last game a troll poster posted _literally_ nothing. I feared that would be the case here with monkey. Then they posted a few legit posts so I moved on from that. If you find that scummy well then gg I guess.

Mention the posts you think are legit.

Welcome to the townblock, Salsabil Faria. There's a $250 membership fee. We accept Visa or Mastercard.

In post 284, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm trying to sort nom right now because our views on boxxxy are so incongruent

just why do you like boxxy so much?

The Dwlee I know would take this wagon and run with it until he has a better read

You are not the Dwlee I know. Who are you?

In post 284, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 269, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 247, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 241, humaneatingmonkey wrote:let's do boxxy guys. it's a good wagon

This is a super weird take? I've liked boxxy's posting a lot. I'm still trying to figure out nom though. I don't know if nom withholding the tell is inherently scummy but I'd really like to hear it if it's going to be justifying a scum read this early especially when it feels like cyrus town-slipped.

What is your preferred wagon atm?

I'm trying to sort nom right now because our views on boxxxy are so incongruent

In post 286, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 284, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm trying to sort nom right now because our views on boxxxy are so incongruent

just why do you like boxxy so much?

I feel like boxxy is trying to move the game forward and made good objections to nom's push without claiming the tell. I got the same exact same "oh trust me we'll kill cyrus and then I'll tell you why we did it" vibes from nom.

In post 286, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 284, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm trying to sort nom right now because our views on boxxxy are so incongruent

just why do you like boxxy so much?

most asked question of the late 2000s

In post 289, Salsabil Faria wrote:Do you see my 275? I also think he is scummy.

Yes, you voted him.

humaneatingmonkey wrote:The Dwlee I know would take this wagon and run with it until he has a better read

I don't vote town reads unless it's a deadline hammer.

In post 290, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 286, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 284, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm trying to sort nom right now because our views on boxxxy are so incongruent

just why do you like boxxy so much?

I feel like boxxy is trying to move the game forward and made good objections to nom's push without claiming the tell. I got the same exact same "oh trust me we'll kill cyrus and then I'll tell you why we did it" vibes from nom.

making good objections and moving the game forward can also come from scum, btw. but please, tell me what these move the game forward moments were and what the good objections were. what's your read on nom? have you considered what i told you about boxxy?

In post 293, humaneatingmonkey wrote:making good objections and moving the game forward can also come from scum, btw. but please, tell me what these move the game forward moments were and what the good objections were. what's your read on nom? have you considered what i told you about boxxy?

Well yea but it's typically townie and I don't see anything else weird about boxxy. Game forward by being one of the first to post real-looking reads, pressuring you into not trolling, pressuring nom to share the tell. I think objecting to the nom "I'm gonna share the tell tomorrow" is good because I had the same problem and he beat me to the punch.

I'm not sure of nom right now. Not sharing the tell could come from scum trying to just free miselim there or just cocky town but I think his reaction to boxxy is weird there because I just want him to share the tell.

What specifically did you say about boxxy? The game is moving super fast and I don't remember.

In post 254, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Boxxy's posts aren't good. TL;DR Boxxy is positioning himself to be the town's lord and savior from these anti-town scrubs and he's gonna scumhunt the scum to infinity and beyond. I read this as scum who's trying to score towncred. This is not how town actually score towncred. Town score towncred by making an effort in actually sorting slots. But in fact, he's done the opposite — he's reading into things very superficially and focuses much more on keeping the 'tegridy of much tuhwn.

In post 255, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 225, humaneatingmonkey wrote:> Seanzie is dishonest
> votes nomnomnom for "anti-town behavior"

In post 227, humaneatingmonkey wrote:>monkey is anti-town and should be lynched
>hahaha i was just saying that just in case!

In post 208, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 200, boxxy wrote:this is just noise preventing us from doing actual scumhunting.

he said, with trumpets and fanfare

In post 292, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 289, Salsabil Faria wrote:Do you see my 275? I also think he is scummy.

In post 222, boxxy wrote:

In post 201, Seanzie wrote:

In post 191, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 171, Seanzie wrote:ssbm_Kyouko just ninja'd my thoughts re: Boxxxy scumreading Monkey, and I think that is a good look since Monkey is an easy push right now. I'd still like to hear ssbm_Kyouko's response to those reads they gave that I asked them about, but I'm giving this slot a townlean.

But scums offen try to go for easy push(es)??

Yes, Boxxxy went for the easy push and ssbm_Kyouko questioned Boxxxy about it, which looks good for ssbm_Kyouko.

This feels like a reach, and possibly dishonest. Cause I didn't even vote monkey, i just said I support a policy lim at end of day if they don't contribute more.

nomnomnom wrote:I'll share it, promise! Just not right now, it's too early to reveal my secrets, and as I said, it's a hassle and a half to explain and I wouldn't want to get in the way of your scumhunting, right?
However you can trust me. 90% sure Cyrus is scum here

VOTE: nomnomnom


In other news monkey moves to slight townlean.

In post 149, boxxy wrote:jesus christ that was 6 pages in no time.

In post 42, cyrus62 wrote:rvs votes dont mean nothing for one for

two im a wild card . so i tend to make games wild

. you seem to be trying to hard relax and have fun gee. we just started . you will see me casting votes every where when i think people are scum . even when i said they were town. plus no two games of mine are the same.

wild cards are anti-town, calling yourself feels like trying to pre-deflect any scum reads people get of your plays.

VOTE: cyrus62

Also another name for this game is "werewolf" where the 'werewofl" or "wolf" is the mafia. Not entirely convinced that your wolf outrage was genuine.


My scumreads:

cyrus92
monkee

Townreads:

seanzie

Rest are null

In post 151, boxxy wrote:Re: humaneatingmonkey

troll players are anti-town

In post 172, boxxy wrote:

In post 164, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 135, cyrus62 wrote:i see kerset as more lay back town to be honest i wont vote them yet.

What is laid back town about Kerset?

In post 151, boxxy wrote:Re: humaneatingmonkey

troll players are anti-town

Anti-town is not the same as scum. Quite early in the Day for policy as well which is what monkey would be at this point

Yeah yeah, I've had this argument many times in the past. In my experience people playing anti-town are more likely to flip scum.

Additionally I just dislike playing against troll players and will always policy them until the meta changes and we don't people to troll their way to day 2. So let it be known I support a policy on monkee unless they contribute more before end of day.

In post 222, boxxy wrote:Cause I didn't even vote monkey, i just said I support a policy lim at end of day if they don't contribute more.

I would have shared the tell already if it wasn't for the fact that 177 sent alarm bells to my brain, so instead I just decided to bait more to see what kind of reaction I'd get, and surely enough I got VOTE: 222 which might as well be a scumclaim from Boxxy at that point.

here comes the spoon, Dwlee. it's an airplane. wide and open, chew and swallow so you grow up big and strong.