Page 12 of 72

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:16 pm
by Prism
Can you elaborate on what would hypothetically make this a masterpiece?

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:18 pm
by Tammy
In post 265, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 213, Tammy wrote:I've been bit in the ass too many times for writing people off as town off things like that, and I'm not going to do that this game
ok but not even a townlean?
Nope. I pretty much have a healthy dose of suspicion of everyone here right now.

I have a small reason for why wisdom might be town and a small reason for why pooky might be town, but both my reasons are dumb and I don’t trust them.

Probably feel the best about the duck right now…maybe? I liked his last response to me.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:18 pm
by Tammy
In post 275, Prism wrote:Can you elaborate on what would hypothetically make this a masterpiece?
I’m posting.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:22 pm
by Tammy
In post 223, the worst wrote:
In post 220, Tammy wrote:
In post 217, the worst wrote:i'm like the king of declaring people cleared then changing my mind 30 seconds later and i still don't feel bad for treating wisdom as town until he makes me second guess myself. :P

this convo doesn't feel very productive
That's fine! I change my mind a lot too, but why wouldn't getting people to talk about the reasoning for their reads and trying to determine if they're real or bs be productive?
i'm not really sure if there's any way for me to meaningfully evaluate my reads off this convo
has it helped you read me at all?
I’m probably should have but I didn’t realize you were meaning you specifically with it being unproductive. And my interest was more on mafmen than you.

It didn’t, no, but I do like this question to me at the end.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:34 pm
by Tammy
In post 273, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i'd be lowkey disappointed if the scum team was just infinity+klick
Do you think cookie cutter is town?

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:34 pm
by Prism
Rereading I actually don't think you had the specificity on the tell that I gave. It was broader and more about my demands on Nacho, who I'd read walls of and go "What the fuck is this?" and throw in the trash. That manifested differently for petapan, for example, who I always rake over the coals on his reads but am just like "u make sense but no way HMPH" and make him sleep on the couch.

Which I, uh, definitely make an equally burdensome demands of play from people as scum, but I was really hoping the loss of specificity was important and it was not.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:54 pm
by Prism
So far I'd trust literally no one, which kind of owns

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:00 pm
by Tammy
My tell on that was a work in progress anyway based on your interactions with nacho, chara and peta. I just expected a little grilling. I don’t think I’m an entirely easy read for you early game and probably not until I have some meat. You had a healthy bit of suspicion on me in warehouse 13 until I had my ranty ragish wall of reads.

Regardless I don’t have much in the way of reads to discuss. My post a few ago is basically where I’m at. I don’t have any real leans one way or the other and I expect the nature of this setup means I’ll be extra careful on my reads. Pooky is weirding me out a bit and I’m trying to determine if the pocket attempt is too overt or if that’s just pooky.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:01 pm
by the worst
there isn't really anyone i'd trust here yet either

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:01 pm
by Tammy
*too overt to be scum

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:02 pm
by Tammy
Good we can all be squinty eyed bastids shooting eye daggers at each other then!

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:05 pm
by Prism
I can vouch that hitting on people all game and playing only when he feels like it is classic Pooky

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:06 pm
by the worst
easy solution, simply don't read his posts

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:24 pm
by Tammy
But then I wouldn’t know what he says about me. Rule #1 of the self-absorbed is to always read what someone says about you.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:26 pm
by the worst
oh snap. maybe the real reason i can't read his posts is because i'm self-absorbed and upset that nobody is talking about me.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:59 pm
by Prism
I guess part of my hesitation here is that so much of this is self-facing, and reacting to my wrong expectations to ameliorate me. There's no weaponization of the expectations you have for me, and that throws me. I was surprised to see you drop the explanation about my preference so quickly. It is a perceptive and clear divergence.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:02 pm
by Prism
Like I'm astounded that you took the preference seriously enough to remember it and you make the connection. No one else onsite even
remembers
the preference let alone uses it.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:04 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 279, Tammy wrote:
In post 273, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i'd be lowkey disappointed if the scum team was just infinity+klick
Do you think cookie cutter is town?

more than those 2 at least

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:05 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 286, Prism wrote:playing only when he feels like it
oh cmon i just took a tiny nap

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:06 pm
by Prism
Well, push yourself a bit and see if lightning strikes twice.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:07 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 274, Tammy wrote:You’re underestimating how terrible I think it will go when I roll scum.

I’d consider this a masterpiece lol
so pocketed

the only thing that would hurt me more terribly than Tammy flipping red would be if she were to leave with anyone else.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:07 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
she may yet do both

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:09 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 282, Tammy wrote:Pooky is weirding me out a bit
I should probably explain at some point but I have chosen not to in order to leave you in suspense.

If you would like me to explain let me know but I think it would be more fun for both of us if I did not.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:09 pm
by Infinity 324
In post 276, Tammy wrote:Nope. I pretty much have a healthy dose of suspicion of everyone here right now.
imo you're being too paranoid. just because you've falsely cleared people for similar reasons in the past doesn't make them invalid.

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:10 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 289, the worst wrote:oh snap. maybe the real reason i can't read his posts is because i'm self-absorbed and upset that nobody is talking about me.
I think Klick is fairly interested in you.

He hasn't talked about anyone else since!