Mafiascum.net

In post 273, House wrote:

In post 267, MegAzumarill wrote:The case is mastina is usually pretty thourough and accurate with mechanical stuff, yet is using pretty blatant assumptions rather than mechanics to create a POE that I don't think is accurate. It has obviously been thought about at length but yet is so flimsy and is being presented at concrete. That is why I believe it's likely from scum as an attempt to easily put townies up for lim and look townie

Hi there, Betelgeuse.

Imagine answering a question

I think Mastina clearly person who will submit Town preference or press "No preference". Both of these quarantee she is not mafia in this game OR i am lying.

Therefory if you doubt Mastina alignment, you should redirect accusation in my face.

In post 276, Enchant wrote:quarantee she is not mafia in this game

No such thing as a guarantee.

In post 277, House wrote:

In post 276, Enchant wrote:quarantee she is not mafia in this game

No such thing as a guarantee.

If you read how alignments roll in this game, it's quarantee.

In post 278, Enchant wrote:

In post 277, House wrote:

In post 276, Enchant wrote:quarantee she is not mafia in this game

No such thing as a guarantee.

If you read how alignments roll in this game, it's quarantee.

If you consider the possibility that other players took that information into account when SUBMITTING their preference, it's NOT a guarantee.

Also...

@, can you answer 266?

Also, I only just now realised that your character is based off Dr. House from the TV series. Somehow, Hugh Laurie in your avi combined with your username gave me nothing.

In post 277, House wrote:

In post 276, Enchant wrote:quarantee she is not mafia in this game

No such thing as a guarantee.

In post 278, Enchant wrote:

In post 277, House wrote:

In post 276, Enchant wrote:quarantee she is not mafia in this game

No such thing as a guarantee.

If you read how alignments roll in this game, it's quarantee.

House, it's a quarantee not a guarantee. Enchant must quarantine for 5 days if wrong on mastina's alignment.

Wut

In post 269, MegAzumarill wrote:Mastina, Mastina, Mastina

Ez

In post 271, MegAzumarill wrote:In seriousness this game has had a lot of talk about preferences which is not AI and actually thinking the game is solved at this point is laughable

VOTE: MegAzumarill

No, I’m not staying on this until I get an answer.

UNVOTE: MegAzumarill

Just F’n wow…

I am going to try here. The level of theory and reasoning here has transcended anything I could even possibly contribute to ,but I am going to try.

From an outsiders perspective.And, what I mean by that is someone that is not as familiar with some of these players as others(played with Galron and Greeting recently and a form
of a Taly). This seems a lot like people are trying to read the person and not the game. I keep seeing posts like “this is “x”‘s scum behavior or this is their town behavior. I know that’s a whole meta thing, not my point here.

I think that’s a dangerous way of looking at this game. This is my first u pick. I submitted some boring ass roles with a town preference because I didn’t want to look like a fool and have the mod have to message me with.” You can’t have that one in this game”. The reason I think this is important is because I doubt I’m the only one that went into this, therefore trying to read the “player” might not be the best way to go about things

I feel I have an ok grasp of what Mastina is laying out. And that’s why I wanted to ask others. Who have played with this person , not about the person. But the logic. It makes sense to me. But I am so
Overwhelmed, that means nothing.

Titus,does seem familiar from my brief stay here a few years back and if memory serves me right, was very on point with many things. This is a vague memeory, mind you.

Anyway. These two are town reads for me, I like the logic and I like the assertiveness of saying that there is a disagreement with it. It comes off to me as two people really trying to solve.

Few notes- I’m not a fan of the belief that game entries are Al.

Also. I think looking at a players wiki should be used as anecdotal at best. I barely knew how to edit mine back in the day and surely haven’t remembered since.

Ok I can see why mindmelded with POV.

Do you think the wagon is justified, ?

In post 187, MegAzumarill wrote:VOTE: Mastina
The reasoning there is pretty abyssmal and I don't think it wasn't thought through so I'm leaning on malicious


Also no thought into actually why someone might not share their preference even though that reason was pretty clearly laid out in our first interaction.

(And whether that (players with town preference more likely to be prs) is true or not doesn't really matter, because it is clear that i think that which means outing my preference would imply whether I am pr or vanilla.)

I am reading them now…

I hate this post so much, how you can have the audacity to say the reasoning was not “thought through” is almost insulting. Agree or not. Not a good assessment.

In post 208, Galron wrote:

In post 207, Scorpious wrote:

In post 206, Galron wrote:

In post 205, Scorpious wrote:

In post 202, Galron wrote:VOTE: yume

Why vote for the first time 7 minutes after a VC was posted.

And for a person that has said nothing?

Were you worried about the perception of you not having one in?

Yes.

Why?

Reasons.

I want it on record that this does not make comfortable and will ask one more time
And only one more if you care to elaborate.

In post 291, Scorpious wrote:

In post 187, MegAzumarill wrote:VOTE: Mastina
The reasoning there is pretty abyssmal and I don't think it wasn't thought through so I'm leaning on malicious


Also no thought into actually why someone might not share their preference even though that reason was pretty clearly laid out in our first interaction.

(And whether that (players with town preference more likely to be prs) is true or not doesn't really matter, because it is clear that i think that which means outing my preference would imply whether I am pr or vanilla.)

I am reading them now…

I hate this post so much, how you can have the audacity to say the reasoning was not “thought through” is almost insulting. Agree or not. Not a good assessment.

I'm saying the opposite in fact
The fact it was thought through and still bad is why it's likely malicious

In post 290, Taly wrote:Do you think the

Meg

wagon is justified,

Scorp

?

I think the vote on Mastina is horrible and lazy. They have done nothing beyond critiquing the main focal point at this point in the game. I see no counter argument either.

All in all I see some meaningless content that doesn’t go much further than “nah. I don’t like that idea”.

As far as a wagon. Really, why not? I think a gamestate shift would be good right now.

Again. Learning the u-pick mechanic as I go here and it seems that with so many variables and options, early pressure may not be the worst thing. Especially on someone that isn’t really knocking my socks off with content.

I could supper this wagon, however I am waiting on an answer from Galron that will determine how RVS my current vote stays.

Scorpious and zefiend, you guys are possibly metaing me after a long break. Any meta on or after September 2nd 2019 is bad. My whole personality shifted. I know neither of you appeared to reach conclusions, so I wanted to mention this before you did. Bad reads with good intent can royally screw reads as players are interconnected.

*on or before September

I'm out for the day.

In post 281, Greeting wrote:@

House

, can you answer 266?

Perhaps, if you're not so vague.

I'm at work, I don't have time to chase down what that question is referring to.