Open 853 - PYP X/Y S_S [game over!]

[Datisi]

vote count 1.03

with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-14 01:30:00).

yeet

Aristeia [3]:

humaneatingmonkey, Bellaphant, Ausuka

Enchant [2]:

implosion, Save The Dragons

humaneatingmonkey [2]:

Aristeia, Roden

Ausuka [1]:

Dwlee99

Klick [1]:

Gamma Emerald

not voting [5]:

Harley Quinn, Malakittens, Enchant, Klick, Titus

mod notes

~ this is a mod note.

flavour

[Aristeia]

Spoiler: For Dats<3

[Dwlee99]

VOTE: HEM

[Save The Dragons]

VOTE: HEM why not

[humaneatingmonkey]

im not even that aggressive. and im not thoughtless.

[humaneatingmonkey]

you keep coming back to the idea that i think you're scum because you chose a high number. i think it's a deliberate misrepresentation at this point, i have cleared this up before. i thought it was off that you would declare yourself town and the other high number people as town, and forming a block because of that when your numbers are too similar with Malakittens. and that was enough for me to vote you early game. i actually wanted you to succeed in your experiment, and i was getting impatient that it's been like around 8 pages and you haven't even explained to us what's up even though you have like half of the game's answer. that's why i also got irritated that you dropped it.

[humaneatingmonkey]

this is just pure revisionist nonsense.

he did not vote me for my comment about large numbers - he voted me for vibes. he decided to change what he was pushing me for after he saw Ausuka pushing me for "large numbers" he never even mentioned the large numbers thing until AFTER Ausuka started pushing me for it. He had previously stated in 128 that he didn't think the number discussion about large numbers was even useful so he clearly did not CARE about large numbers. He's now changing his story as if he was pushing me for the large number theory to begin with.

this is also super dishonest. where did she think the vibes came from?

[humaneatingmonkey]

like it's a whole level of irony when you were accusing me of being "uncharitable" and "disgusting" for mischaracterizing you and then turn around and give the most uncharitable and dishonest case that you can give me. i dont think this is disgusting, because this is probably just good scum play.

[humaneatingmonkey]

i keep reading the case and it actively pisses me off how much namecalling there is so im gonna step away from the game for now.

[Aristeia]

you keep coming back to the idea that i think you're scum because you chose a high number. i think it's a deliberate misrepresentation at this point, i have cleared this up before. i thought it was off that you would declare yourself town and the other high number people as town, and forming a block because of that when your numbers are too similar with Malakittens. and that was enough for me to vote you early game. i actually wanted you to succeed in your experiment, and i was getting impatient that it's been like around 8 pages and you haven't even explained to us what's up even though you have like half of the game's answer. that's why i also got irritated that you dropped it.

this is also super dishonest. where did she think the vibes came from?

you never explained the "vibes" comment initially so I have no idea what "vibes" you are talking about.

when ausuka began pushing me for large numbers/discussing the large numbers with me, you said you were uninterested.[which does not make sense if you were pushing me for the large number comment I made initially or if the "vibes" comment was about large numbers]

you only later revised your position to say that you were pushing me for the large number comment all along - which makes sense as you see there is traction.

This is clearly you being inconsistent and making things up in your trajectory as it happens rather than an organic thought process.

[Aristeia]

i keep reading the case and it actively pisses me off how much namecalling there is so im gonna step away from the game for now.

I will make an effort to avoid "name-calling" if you show me which parts of my case are "name-calling" or attacking you personally - I am trying to explain how I see your play from my point of view.

I do not know you as a person, I have never met you and it is unlikely to ever happen. My comments are made wholly within the context of the game and not meant as a personal affront to you.

[humaneatingmonkey]

you said you were uninterested

quote it

[Aristeia]

im not even that aggressive. and im not thoughtless.

I reread your entire iso in this game three times before I made my comments and my case.

the vast majority of your content posts are directly targeting me in the most uncharitable manner possible.

I have shown multiple inconsistencies and outright falsehoods.

Instead of addressing each of them you've decided to make blanket statements and feign anger.

This is unlikely to lead to an outcome that helps me understand your POV if you are town here.

My offer stands to you for you to produce an example of a game where you begin with this type of death tunnel on another player as town rather than taking a holistic approach.

[humaneatingmonkey]

where did i say you were lockscum?

[Aristeia]

where did i say you were lockscum?

you are quibbling over technicalities at this point.

if I am not lockscum to you why are you focusing the entirety of your effort this game to making up lies about me?

[humaneatingmonkey]

how did i deathtunnel you?

[humaneatingmonkey]

you took a big sum of the early pages and all the spotlight was going for you. of course im going to mention you. and my read was not progressing as it was just an early vibe so i wanted for us to move on.

[Aristeia]

you said you were uninterested

quote it

im excited to move on from this numbers discussion. i can't get a decent reads out of it

here ^

[humaneatingmonkey]

thats different from uninterested. i wasnt getting decent reads out of the numbers discussion. i wanted to talk about the wagon on you, which could give us better reads. my mission was successful when you engaged me and here we are.

[Aristeia]

how did i deathtunnel you?

if you look at your iso, it is quite clear that almost every post you make with content is directly targetting me;

there is little sorting/interaction with others.

that is basically the definition of a death tunnel.

[humaneatingmonkey]

you took a big sum of the early pages and all the spotlight was going for you. of course im going to mention you. and my read was not progressing as it was just an early vibe so i wanted for us to move on.

[Aristeia]

thats different from uninterested. i wasnt getting decent reads out of the numbers discussion. i wanted to talk about the wagon on you, which could give us better reads. my mission was successful when you engaged me and here we are.

this is not even a believable lie.

[humaneatingmonkey]

frame me however you like. you have questions, you got answers.

[Aristeia]

you took a big sum of the early pages and all the spotlight was going for you. of course im going to mention you. and my read was not progressing as it was just an early vibe so i wanted for us to move on.

so is it opportunism or genuine suspicion on your part for you to target me like this?

you didn't just mention me - almost every post you make is targeting me in some way.

focussing all your attention on me and then claiming its because the spotlight is on me[which is a large part due to you] is kind of a terrible excuse.

[Aristeia]

frame me however you like. you have questions, you got answers.

I actually have not received answers from you regarding whether you have a habit of death-tunneling one person to the exclusion of sorting anyone else so early in the day as town.