Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 1:39 pm
vote count 1.03
with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-14 01:30:00).
Page 12 of 168
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 1:45 pm
Spoiler: For Dats<3
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:29 pm
VOTE: HEM
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:45 pm
VOTE: HEM why not
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:07 pm
im not even that aggressive. and im not thoughtless.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:23 pm
you keep coming back to the idea that i think you're scum because you chose a high number. i think it's a deliberate misrepresentation at this point, i have cleared this up before. i thought it was off that you would declare yourself town and the other high number people as town, and forming a block because of that when your numbers are too similar with Malakittens. and that was enough for me to vote you early game. i actually wanted you to succeed in your experiment, and i was getting impatient that it's been like around 8 pages and you haven't even explained to us what's up even though you have like half of the game's answer. that's why i also got irritated that you dropped it.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:24 pm
this is also super dishonest. where did she think the vibes came from?In post 267, Aristeia wrote:this is just pure revisionist nonsense.
he did not vote me for my comment about large numbers - he voted me for vibes. he decided to change what he was pushing me for after he saw Ausuka pushing me for "large numbers" he never even mentioned the large numbers thing until AFTER Ausuka started pushing me for it. He had previously stated in 128 that he didn't think the number discussion about large numbers was even useful so he clearly did not CARE about large numbers. He's now changing his story as if he was pushing me for the large number theory to begin with.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:27 pm
like it's a whole level of irony when you were accusing me of being "uncharitable" and "disgusting" for mischaracterizing you and then turn around and give the most uncharitable and dishonest case that you can give me. i dont think this is disgusting, because this is probably just good scum play.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:30 pm
i keep reading the case and it actively pisses me off how much namecalling there is so im gonna step away from the game for now.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:49 pm
In post 280, humaneatingmonkey wrote:you keep coming back to the idea that i think you're scum because you chose a high number. i think it's a deliberate misrepresentation at this point, i have cleared this up before. i thought it was off that you would declare yourself town and the other high number people as town, and forming a block because of that when your numbers are too similar with Malakittens. and that was enough for me to vote you early game. i actually wanted you to succeed in your experiment, and i was getting impatient that it's been like around 8 pages and you haven't even explained to us what's up even though you have like half of the game's answer. that's why i also got irritated that you dropped it.
In post 281, humaneatingmonkey wrote:this is also super dishonest. where did she think the vibes came from?
you never explained the "vibes" comment initially so I have no idea what "vibes" you are talking about.
when ausuka began pushing me for large numbers/discussing the large numbers with me, you said you were uninterested.[which does not make sense if you were pushing me for the large number comment I made initially or if the "vibes" comment was about large numbers]
you only later revised your position to say that you were pushing me for the large number comment all along - which makes sense as you see there is traction.
This is clearly you being inconsistent and making things up in your trajectory as it happens rather than an organic thought process.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:52 pm
In post 283, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i keep reading the case and it actively pisses me off how much namecalling there is so im gonna step away from the game for now.
I will make an effort to avoid "name-calling" if you show me which parts of my case are "name-calling" or attacking you personally - I am trying to explain how I see your play from my point of view.
I do not know you as a person, I have never met you and it is unlikely to ever happen. My comments are made wholly within the context of the game and not meant as a personal affront to you.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:53 pm
quote itIn post 284, Aristeia wrote:you said you were uninterested
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:56 pm
I reread your entire iso in this game three times before I made my comments and my case.In post 279, humaneatingmonkey wrote:im not even that aggressive. and im not thoughtless.
the vast majority of your content posts are directly targeting me in the most uncharitable manner possible.
I have shown multiple inconsistencies and outright falsehoods.
Instead of addressing each of them you've decided to make blanket statements and feign anger.
This is unlikely to lead to an outcome that helps me understand your POV if you are town here.
My offer stands to you for you to produce an example of a game where you begin with this type of death tunnel on another player as town rather than taking a holistic approach.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:56 pm
where did i say you were lockscum?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:56 pm
you are quibbling over technicalities at this point.In post 288, humaneatingmonkey wrote:where did i say you were lockscum?
if I am not lockscum to you why are you focusing the entirety of your effort this game to making up lies about me?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:57 pm
how did i deathtunnel you?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:58 pm
you took a big sum of the early pages and all the spotlight was going for you. of course im going to mention you. and my read was not progressing as it was just an early vibe so i wanted for us to move on.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:58 pm
In post 286, humaneatingmonkey wrote:quote itIn post 284, Aristeia wrote:you said you were uninterested
In post 128, humaneatingmonkey wrote:im excited to move on from this numbers discussion. i can't get a decent reads out of it
here ^
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:59 pm
thats different from uninterested. i wasnt getting decent reads out of the numbers discussion. i wanted to talk about the wagon on you, which could give us better reads. my mission was successful when you engaged me and here we are.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:59 pm
if you look at your iso, it is quite clear that almost every post you make with content is directly targetting me;In post 290, humaneatingmonkey wrote:how did i deathtunnel you?
there is little sorting/interaction with others.
that is basically the definition of a death tunnel.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:59 pm
In post 291, humaneatingmonkey wrote:you took a big sum of the early pages and all the spotlight was going for you. of course im going to mention you. and my read was not progressing as it was just an early vibe so i wanted for us to move on.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 7:00 pm
this is not even a believable lie.In post 293, humaneatingmonkey wrote:thats different from uninterested. i wasnt getting decent reads out of the numbers discussion. i wanted to talk about the wagon on you, which could give us better reads. my mission was successful when you engaged me and here we are.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 7:04 pm
frame me however you like. you have questions, you got answers.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 7:07 pm
In post 291, humaneatingmonkey wrote:you took a big sum of the early pages and all the spotlight was going for you. of course im going to mention you. and my read was not progressing as it was just an early vibe so i wanted for us to move on.
so is it opportunism or genuine suspicion on your part for you to target me like this?
you didn't just mention me - almost every post you make is targeting me in some way.
focussing all your attention on me and then claiming its because the spotlight is on me[which is a large part due to you] is kind of a terrible excuse.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 7:08 pm
I actually have not received answers from you regarding whether you have a habit of death-tunneling one person to the exclusion of sorting anyone else so early in the day as town.In post 297, humaneatingmonkey wrote:frame me however you like. you have questions, you got answers.