Mafiascum.net

Wait who claimed a role?

In post 100, Yume wrote:Stealth hi bye
I got the role I wanted

@Porkens

Ah I see. Hmm, must be nice.

In post 272, Porkens wrote:I was never on the gamma wagon.

I mean you were definitely at least talking like you might vote Gamma for a minute there

Yeah but that was half way through my read.

In post 98, northsidegal wrote:

In post 65, Gamma Emerald wrote:Enchant always picks 1

this is false, but there is this from a previous game:

Subject: Open 853 - PYP X/Y S_S [scum pt]

Enchant wrote:Let's pick same number (which is common one, not 420) so people think we are not aligned lol

which for now means basically nothing, but is worth putting in the back pocket, so to speak.

How is it false? Unless I missed Enchant playing in one that wasn’t Datisi-run before this

In post 273, JunkoChan wrote:

In post 271, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 267, JunkoChan wrote:I wouldn't call that "decent content" btw, could you tell me why you consider that not lurking?

I mean I think coming in and claiming a role is pretty splashy. Nk is arguable but I do agree with those thinking he leans scummy for that post

you are not asking but for me anyone that lurks is scum until proven innocent

about claiming a role... I mean, I'm inclined to believe that's more scumsided than townsided

I don't really have a response to this, just acknowledging that I read it and don't like it super much

In post 281, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 273, JunkoChan wrote:

In post 271, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 267, JunkoChan wrote:I wouldn't call that "decent content" btw, could you tell me why you consider that not lurking?

I mean I think coming in and claiming a role is pretty splashy. Nk is arguable but I do agree with those thinking he leans scummy for that post

you are not asking but for me anyone that lurks is scum until proven innocent

about claiming a role... I mean, I'm inclined to believe that's more scumsided than townsided

I don't really have a response to this, just acknowledging that I read it and don't like it super much

you don't like what I said or the claim?

i think any discussion about who or who might not have a role needs to stop immediately

In post 241, Roden wrote:Can you explain the point of this vote?

I thought you were the most likely to be scum at this point

In post 244, Roden wrote:

In post 94, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 89, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:I'D SAY PORKENS, ENCHANT AND JUNKO ARE TOWN. PENGUIN IS NULL CLOSER TO TOWN, DANNFLOR IS NULL CLOSER TO SCUM. GAMMA IS SCUM.

What's the reason for Junko town?

VOTE: NK15

why

In post 247, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 240, Dannflor wrote:Gamma…

You were scum in that game

That’s irrelevant
The point I’m making is that I tilt at early pushes sometimes

my problem is not your emotional reaction! I know you have strong emotional reactions as both alignments

I've played with you many many times

it's why I didn't think much of your OMGUS reaction to BEAR it seemed mostly in character

I just felt like you weren't genuinely looking for scum on your wagon along with you emotional reaction??

In post 284, Dannflor wrote:

In post 241, Roden wrote:Can you explain the point of this vote?

I thought you were the most likely to be scum at this point

Is this your first time playing in this set up?

In post 206, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 202, Porkens wrote:There’s a serious non rvs wagon on gamma.

Do you support it or not?
If you do, why not join it?
If you don’t, what’s the motive behind posting this?

this is like the towniest post I think you've made but I'm also wondering if you're partners

In post 287, Roden wrote:

In post 284, Dannflor wrote:

In post 241, Roden wrote:Can you explain the point of this vote?

I thought you were the most likely to be scum at this point

Is this your first time playing in this set up?

yes, why is this relevant

In post 289, Dannflor wrote:

In post 287, Roden wrote:

In post 284, Dannflor wrote:

In post 241, Roden wrote:Can you explain the point of this vote?

I thought you were the most likely to be scum at this point

Is this your first time playing in this set up?

yes, why is this relevant

What role do you think the player at the top of the draft should always take?

In post 258, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 151, Porkens wrote:Yeah gamma is scummy.

Still not seeing it.

actually I take it back I think if gamma flips scum then I want to kill this more than anything

I think Porkens is playing a little too awkwardly for a buddy

and I'm doing bad bad pre-flip associative stuff right now I need to reset

Gamma did townier after the emotional posting wore off

In post 290, Roden wrote:

In post 289, Dannflor wrote:

In post 287, Roden wrote:

In post 284, Dannflor wrote:

In post 241, Roden wrote:Can you explain the point of this vote?

I thought you were the most likely to be scum at this point

Is this your first time playing in this set up?

yes, why is this relevant

What role do you think the player at the top of the draft should always take?

I have not given it much thought

I could see an argument for a lot of things

but I don't see it how it matters when you can just as easily be scum no matter your role

why does my page 5 scum read bother you so

In post 292, Dannflor wrote:

In post 290, Roden wrote:

In post 289, Dannflor wrote:

In post 287, Roden wrote:

In post 284, Dannflor wrote:

In post 241, Roden wrote:Can you explain the point of this vote?

I thought you were the most likely to be scum at this point

Is this your first time playing in this set up?

yes, why is this relevant

What role do you think the player at the top of the draft should always take?

I have not given it much thought

I could see an argument for a lot of things

but I don't see it how it matters when you can just as easily be scum no matter your role

I don't believe this thought process.

In post 293, Dannflor wrote:why does my page 5 scum read bother you so

"why me"

VOTE: Dann

In post 282, JunkoChan wrote:you don't like what I said or the claim

What you said, just the whole Lim all Lurkers of it all. Not my vibe

In post 294, Roden wrote:I don't believe this thought process.

I have never been someone good at or even particularly interested in mechanics, which might be part of the disconnect here

probably best to drop this particular line, I'll ask about it later

Roden what's your read on Porkens

In post 296, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 282, JunkoChan wrote:you don't like what I said or the claim

What you said, just the whole Lim all Lurkers of it all. Not my vibe

okay, unrelated to the game but let me explain you my thought process

if you are town would you like to:

A) let alone lurkers?
B) pressure lurkers?

the answer is always B because town can talk freely while scum has to create a story which is more difficult if they are forced to talk

So by letting lurkers live you are advocating for the scum team regardless of your aligment.

this is of course my point of view and it's how I've always played mafia

So I'm curious why you would be mad about it