prohawk wrote:I think Pie's comments re: Gaiden's wagon still ring true to me. A purely town scum-flash wagon doesn't make any sense
my thoughts on this are basically the same as desp's. IF there was scum on the gaiden wagon, it's among the players early on it that couldn't really jump off. saki is a possibility (because saki's vote didn't matter at all) but saki is saki
prohawk wrote:why did Varsoon tie up his wagon with Gaiden when the tie still would have resulted in a Gaiden lynch?
pretty sure varsoon didn't realise plurality lynches were a thing in this game (which matches with what he was saying at the end of yesterday about making a lynch, any lynch, happen) and he was being varsoon
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:03 pm
by Varsoon
I gotta figure that looking at my wagon will be productive, given that scum could've easily gotten my lynched if they were riding the Gaiden wagon over mine.
lush life wrote:muffina was barely a blip on the radar yesterday, holding back playing it safe, staying away from the major wagons only to make an offhand comment "oh I think all of the main wagons are town!" and yet do nothing to support any of the town reads. <----- scum 101 guyz for realz I promise you from the bottom of my heart muffina will flip red. its just it is such basic scumplay it seems like it is easy to overlook cos yanno it seems kind of obvious! all of his posts are "safe" when maffina is not a safe player and they are designed to promote longevity in a game (not make waves and let town eat their own) and not trying to actually figure things out. DIE SCUMFUCK DIE!!!!1!!
mollie, you quite literally have no idea what my town game looks like. you're making sweeping generalisations here that are so wrong it's not even funny. like, literally every single thing you said in this paragraph is wrong.
scum caught for the wrong reasons hhhmmm?
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:02 am
by Lush Life
moar votes on obvscum danny boy plz
also every1 has to promise me that we will lynch muffina tomorrow for a grand total of 3 scum down!!1! \o/
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:57 am
by Saki
wait so gaiden would've died over varsoon whether or not I voted?
so I'm not conftown?
someone explain this for me plz
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 7:33 am
by bubbajack8
@Saki:
In post 2284, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
Edit:
In a plurality lynch, generally, the person who first reached the highest vote count would be lynched. So, if tied at L3, whoever was at L3 first
wins
gets lynched.[/color]
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:46 am
by GoodCop_BadCop
OKay let's break this down.
Step 1: "Regardless of alignment, is Kat an Oracle?"
If no, stop here, she's scum from your POV
If yes, continue.
Step 2: "Is Kat a mafia oracle?"
IMO no, and here's why. Mafia oracle certainly wouldn't have chosen THAT question over something like "Is there more than one investigative role on the town team this game" or somehting equally useful. Why would scum ask that question when team compisition pretty much tells them the setup? Furthermore, even if this was a faked quesiton, she's made a claim such that the flip of any non-mafia non-town player means she is immediately and instantly speedlynched.
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:02 am
by Katarina LeBlanc
This all seems so unnecessary, the only person so far who I've seen doubt the claim is Jaqen and he voteparkd GCBC yesterday. I thought revealing the oracle question i sent would kill some suspicion and paranoia regarding the setup but apparently people need to pursue irrelevant crap!
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:28 am
by pieguyn
In post 2757, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Furthermore, even if this was a faked quesiton, she's made a claim such that the flip of any non-mafia non-town player means she is immediately and instantly speedlynched.
or SK. I asked GIF and multiball = more than one groupscum faction which SK isn't
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:36 am
by Katarina LeBlanc
Maybe I should've thought my question through.. I'm sorry.
Yes, even "is bubba a bomb" would have been a better question, imo.
In post 2574, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:
Oracle, modified whatever to make it that I can ask the host any question regarding the game. Only answerable with yes or no, and can't ask questions based on alignment.
Yes, even "is bubba a bomb" would have been a better question, imo.
In post 2574, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:
Oracle, modified whatever to make it that I can ask the host any question regarding the game. Only answerable with yes or no, and can't ask questions based on alignment.
I'm glad you see why my question is legal, but I find it interesting that you've tied your role so closely to your alignment here.
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:53 am
by bubbajack8
I'm sorry have you heard of a scum bomb? To me that question is alignment indicative.
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:57 am
by Kagami
It's not. It's clearly a legal question, no less so than "Has bubbajack8 lied about substantive information this game?" which would also be legal.
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:00 am
by Kagami
In post 2770, bubbajack8 wrote:I'm sorry have you heard of a scum bomb? To me that question is alignment indicative.
Yes
It's so completely fucking stupid, I don't think he'd have been able to not claim scum if he actually was.
The crumb is fake. The question is whether he is:
A) Townie worried that his claim won't be bought, and faking a crumb to make it more believable
B) Scum worried that his claim won't be bought, and faking a crumb to make it more believable
C) Townie with a role that is not bomb, but who wants people to think he's bomb for some reason or another
The upper quote indicates that C is not the case, which was the case that I had thought to be the most likely if bubba=town.
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:02 am
by bubbajack8
As a mod: That question would mess me up. The key word in what Katarina said is "based on alignment". Both those questions to me are still trying to get at a players alignment.
If she could have asked it she should have. That would clear me, and would make scum want to kill me. So that would've been a good question had she been able to ask it.
P:edit: read this post. I'm fucking bomb.
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:04 am
by bubbajack8
My main point is she can't ask questions
BASED
on a players alignment. Since a scum bomb is not in existent, it would be based upon alignment. Seeing as I've claimed "has bubbajack lied ..." would also be based upon alignment. Just as has GCBC , Varsoon lied etc.
