Mafiascum.net

Can someone eli5 what it going on.

Is it one lynch, is it a lynch of a pair?

Help me out.

Lynches of pairs.

In post 2751, Gentleman 6 wrote:Lynches of pairs.

Ok. And we are looking at g5/l4 as a pair to lynch?

I would like to. For G5, not for L4.

Are the pts opened to be used?

There's the lynch on L5/G8 which I understand why people are pushing for and am okay with and I don't think that the pairing, like, flips scum.
But I don't really see it as a priority lynch because it doesn't make endgame, I think we are going to get fuck all info wise from a G8 scum flip, and I'm scared if G8 does flip scum it'll entrench people in their views of the gamestate and if it flips double town no one will really think much of it so I just don't think it's a productive lynch?

Like the best reason to lynch them here is so that I don't have to read L5's posts anymore. And that sounds mean but I don't really think much of being mean to someone who has played against site rules constantly.

I'll confer with 9, but if she's down I'm in

I'm really not understanding the hostility towards me saying that we should probably leave if no one wants to lynch G5.
It's coming entirely from people who overlap in holding two positions:

1) L8 is at the very least above average scum (in some cases, super heavy scumreads).
2) G5 is almost certainly not scum.

So, if I'm only pushing your townreads and I'd be bringing down potential scum with me, why the objection to me leaving?
Like if you're going to make posts about wanting me around to give reads and stuff... you have my reads and you're not doing anything about them now, so what's going to change exactly?

In post 1633, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1626, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1622, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 1615, Lady 6 wrote:Bullshit. You bc can do it.

I think I know who L5 is and who he'd invite. :/

I highly doubt you know this person.

I am her sooo.... Just play the game. Either town it up so you can partner with G3 or take your shot.

I'm trying to do both.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

Fakegod, can we just remove L5 from play for outside game influence? This whole conversation seems... icky

In post 1610, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1604, Lady 5 wrote:Yeah I’ll get her to replace in if she’s willing.

Idk, this just doesnt seem right. Idk

L1:

accept you are a sit candidate because of your slots activity. You have a hill to climb. I would start with some reads and which gentleman you want to court

In post 1642, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1639, Lady 5 wrote:She usually pushed really hard so if anyone would be her it would be Lady 2 but as I said I doubt she is playing in this game.

Stop it.

I really don't think Gentleman 5 talks about having L5 modkilled like their alignment is in question. I don't think he talks about anyone like alignments are in question.
I don't think he has ever made a single post that felt the slightest bit curious about anyone else in the game's alignments, just talks about people that have to go and that he wants to lynch.

His trying to discourage me from seeking replacement when I threatened to speedleave in the second phase doesn't look good to me either, particularly given that he attacked me in the same post.
Feels like he was just trying to goad me into leaving for the simple reason that there's no longer a vocal person going after him. Especially since no one else SRs him.

Not that I threatened to replace, to be clear, it was in reaction to someone else telling me to replace out (yes discussing replacements is against the rules but I'm not discussing replacements right now I'm discussing other people discussing replacements, and if even that is problematic enough to warrant action then action should have already been taken against multiple slots this game.)

I'm really sad that L1 died because she was the only person posting anything thoughtful in the last very long time.

Honestly add L2 to the potential scum list. L1 was way better.

Funny how I came to case G5 and ended up saying so little about him and so much about stuff only tangentially related to him but eh. That's all for now, folks!

L2 never gave that G5 reread she's been promising for a while.

Would be a very shrewd scum decision to sit back and wait to see just how much momentum the wagon gets before she decides whether she wants to join in. Or maybe she's just busy. Who knows. Not me. I never lost control.

My list of potential scum doesn't include probabilities by the way. I think it's highly likely that even if L8 is scum, we still very very likely have T-T pairings in

G7/L7
G3/L6
G6/L8* (we'll see)
G2/L9* (we'll see, where tf is L9)

Not citing posts right now but I felt like there was sudden shade directed at G7 in the same way as L8 which says to me that that's another T-T pairing that scum are scared of and are trying to prevent it from being an endgame pairing.

Yeah, I'm discussing townreads. The argument can be made that it's suboptimal but I don't think I'll live past intermission regardless so I'm going to start PoEing the game.

Okay, now that's all. Later.

In post 2354, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 2351, Lady 3 wrote:Guys it's not about actually wanting to die, it's about looking town by asking to die because scum doesn't suicide

G6 told L4 that he wants to die first, then when he flips town, suicide.
L8 said she wants us to die first.

Hmmmm?

In post 2359, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 2355, Lady 3 wrote:Okay?

G6 is willing to die to get me killed because he thinks Im scum.

But L8 wants L4 to suicide, saying she will go afterwards.

If what you said about L8 is true in 2351, theres a discrepancy between L8 and G6.

In post 2363, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 2312, Lady 8 wrote:G5-L4 should suicide and then G6 can suicide our pair.

kthx.

In post 1823, Gentleman 6 wrote:L4, if I leave the dance (proof that I'm town) can you leave the dance after?

L3, Im saying I think G6 is actually willing to die to prove Im scum.

It doesnt look like L8 shares the same sentiment. I dont think shes willing to die first. I dont think shes willing to die at all.

This is all I need.

VOTE: L8/G6

L8, you should prove how “town” you are and leave.

L5/G8 is autolynched after either me or L8 dies.

DO NOT FORGOT THAT

Townreading G5 sort of boggles my mind.

In post 2673, Lady 8 wrote:I regret signing up for this game.

You can do something about it right now

In post 2691, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 2687, Lady 3 wrote:Lady 5 so what are your thoughts on G5/L4 and L8/G6?

That I don’t think there all Town unless the team is within -) L2, G8, G1 and L6.

Pretty sure this is different from last nights opinion.

In post 2746, Gentleman 6 wrote:L9 you really need to be doing more than you're doing. The game hasn't coped well with your absence.

Yeah, alright. I don't have the energy to respond to every post within 60 pages, I'll skim through and give my impressions. This will happen later today. I noticed we're in dance stage, I'll talk about who I want lynched too

In post 2707, Lady 4 wrote:Not that I currently want to play this awful game.

Are you comfortable with letting crap slots slide by without you to catch them?

In post 2708, Gentleman 6 wrote:yes

What?

In post 2709, Lady 4 wrote:Will you promise me unequivocally that you will not leave the dance if I kill myself?

WHAT?