Mafiascum.net

In post 2739, bob3141 wrote:

In post 2737, Invisibility wrote:

In post 2702, bob3141 wrote:

In post 2699, Invisibility wrote:VOTE: fuzzy
scum on the wagon

So how many of the players on ank wagon are scum. Is it your view of the players or how teh wagon progressed. Since you say scum on wagon but you yourself voted for that wagon. If it is how the wagon progressed and not your fellow wagoniers. How did you read on ank conciliate with your read on those voting for her along side you. or if it is how wagon progressed was there any moment you doubted having your vote on her.


Although i do find ank lynch suspect as although there were legitimate reasons to scum leaner her from day one. During my enquiries she felt allot different from scum her. I pushed on why she would lynch gjt a claimed pr and her answers were quick and to the point. Whiel from my experince when she was scum trying to push back against a tracker/rolecop in a prior game. She put allot of effort into trying to discredit that claim rather than a simple and clear answes she had been giving as day two wore on.

And her answer to why she self voted teh first time made me feel confident enough to remove her from my scum reads. As she answered calmly and coherently while when she did teh self vote then. The intent she had then was to portray a townie flailing at being voted up. To make town think she was town.


Now although most wagons do have atleast one scum on them after reaching a certain size. Although this wagon was 6 in reality it was 5. As like schrodinger's cat anks vote had not yet got sealed in its box

are you saying it was an all town wagon?

So you certain dont think its all town then but how many scum do you think is on that wagon. Talk us through it.


As i said in the post we should not exclude the possibility that the wagon was all town. As from my perspective I know that the two leading wagons me and ank were both town. And at the time there was no other real alternatives so scum naturaly wouldnt feel too pressed. For instance in prior game there were 3 town wagons going at once. Although in that game there was only one scum left the principal remains the same.

So unless scum were in the other alternatives that could have happened over the 3 days then there is the real possibility that scum were simply happy with either mislynch occuring.


Now that can take the form of scum beign split between the wagons or scum just avoiding them. So i wonder i why you are so quick to assume that scum must be on the wagon.

In post 2742, insomnia wrote:

In post 2736, Invisibility wrote:Fl what’s your opinion of isomnia rn?

you're getting vig'd for this tbh

FL said I'm town, what reply would you even expect from him that helps you discern his alignment?

In post 2747, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@Vizzy
No. I never never ever associate any two people as scum partners unless atleast one flips scum. period double exclamation point

I was not a hundred percent sold on Ank as scum but FL claimed a guilty on them so I voted for them. Before I could unvote when I realize FL claim was complete garbage they were lynched.
I take complete responsibility for my part of Anks lynching

I am not totally sold on you as scum however I am sure there were scum pushing for a Gjt lynch as a counter wagon to Nom. It did not necessarily start that way however the Gjt wagon became a counter. Given Noms' role, I dont see scum rolling over so easily for a Nom lynch
counter wagon.

In post 2720, Titus wrote:

In post 2712, Flavor Leaf wrote:VCA says one of of Joges, invis, Kanna is scum.

And then one of the people on the Mislynch Bait wagon is probably bussing, but I’m not totally against the idea of it being all town and that point when Rex joins.

Can you explain the first?

My quick VC skim had S Rex as scum.

In post 2722, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 2720, Titus wrote:

In post 2712, Flavor Leaf wrote:VCA says one of of Joges, invis, Kanna is scum.

And then one of the people on the Mislynch Bait wagon is probably bussing, but I’m not totally against the idea of it being all town and that point when Rex joins.

Can you explain the first?

My quick VC skim had S Rex as scum.

They’re the unknowns on the wagon. Rex has been genuine, and I feel when they hopped on Nomnom, it ended up being the last pebble to cause the momentum to slide in that direction.

I don’t think Nomnom got hard bussed

In post 2756, insomnia wrote:I really do sound like a chick huh

In post 2759, insomnia wrote:TFL just fall in my pocket, the towniest potato.

In post 2763, Invisibility wrote:

In post 2747, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@Vizzy
No. I never never ever associate any two people as scum partners unless atleast one flips scum. period double exclamation point

I was not a hundred percent sold on Ank as scum but FL claimed a guilty on them so I voted for them. Before I could unvote when I realize FL claim was complete garbage they were lynched.

I just think associating people who have atleast one has flipped scum hurts town
I take complete responsibility for my part of Anks lynching

I am not totally sold on you as scum however I am sure there were scum pushing for a Gjt lynch as a counter wagon to Nom. It did not necessarily start that way however the Gjt wagon became a counter. Given Noms' role, I dont see scum rolling over so easily for a Nom lynch
counter wagon.

UNVOTE: cool