Posted: Thu May 06, 2021 7:01 am
It's probably notsci/iverson/(one of DC or Infinity)
why not?In post 2749, notscience wrote:And they are two wagons I would never in a million years push as scum
In post 1855, SirCakez wrote:I find it suspicious that NM is even showing up here
He didn't give a shit when he was perpetually on the table for miselim in Popcorn
In post 2159, SirCakez wrote:Some people have been saying the NM wagon was too easy; if that's so why are we seeing so much resistance and alternatives (like myself) being thrown up?
In post 2168, SirCakez wrote:I SR NM independently of POE
In post 2394, SirCakez wrote:Still not seeing a reason to not yeet NM
In post 2407, SirCakez wrote:cuz if he hammer NM he can just catch up overnight while new stuff isn't being generated
notsci's really gonna pull the "he was not trying to elim NM" card?In post 2518, SirCakez wrote:I like the NM wagon I'm not shading both. I just think there are probably scum on board.In post 2513, notscience wrote:I’ll vote either and am following Bork
But unsubstantiated shade on both of the wagons while not suggesting an alternative is lolsy
also I forgot about this shit
this interaction seems so fake given that notsci never actually moved off BulgeIn post 2254, notscience wrote:Bulge I want to kill one of nachos scumreads today
I’m not really super picky
What do you think about mena
he keeps bringing up this argument that he "wouldn't have played this way as scum"In post 2260, notscience wrote:I mean yeah
But you’re kidding yourself if you think scum me has the stones to funnel ducking nacho lmao
total trashIn post 2513, notscience wrote:I’ll vote either and am following Bork
But unsubstantiated shade on both of the wagons while not suggesting an alternative is lolsy
I am still not going to answer it for you, as you have intentionally avoided addressing the nonsense in favor of flopping or playing dumb, and only reluctantly acknowledged it existed and minimized engaging with it when challenged.In post 2762, Infinity 324 wrote:Normally when I don't understand something I ask and judge how believable the answer is, but iverson seems to really want me to vote him before he answers, so /shrug
No one else vote iverson obv
I am not unvoting you at any point so might as well let scum blitz it if I am wrong.In post 2764, SirCakez wrote:rn I'm just trying to decide who has higher scum equity between notsci and Iverson
I hate when people do this to me in generalIn post 2766, notscience wrote:Bulge was also in nachos scumreads
I wouldn't. You literally just played with me as scum and if you can't spot the tonal differences in my play than all the times you've seen me as town then you are beyond help lmao
And your play yesterday was bad. Mine was bad as well. But I stand by what I said.
Dude I don't fucking understand it there's nothing for me to engage thereIn post 2765, Iverson wrote:I am still not going to answer it for you, as you have intentionally avoided addressing the nonsense in favor of flopping or playing dumb, and only reluctantly acknowledged it existed and minimized engaging with it when challenged.In post 2762, Infinity 324 wrote:Normally when I don't understand something I ask and judge how believable the answer is, but iverson seems to really want me to vote him before he answers, so /shrug
No one else vote iverson obv
Iverson/Prism is nearing the point of open wolfingIn post 2767, Iverson wrote:I am not unvoting you at any point so might as well let scum blitz it if I am wrong.In post 2764, SirCakez wrote:rn I'm just trying to decide who has higher scum equity between notsci and Iverson
I'm ridiculously easy to read, dude. Yes I did stupid shit. I'm either 100% on or off a cliff.In post 2768, SirCakez wrote:I hate when people do this to me in general
the "you've played with me enough that you should know how to read me" line
Nacho pulled it too
do you want to die?In post 2771, Iverson wrote:"nearing" I literally openly blitzed a town player but saying I won't unvote a scumread is what does it for you?
Yeah, that's why I fled overnight.In post 2773, SirCakez wrote:do you want to die?In post 2771, Iverson wrote:"nearing" I literally openly blitzed a town player but saying I won't unvote a scumread is what does it for you?