Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:00 am
mastina n roden u meanIn post 2443, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:If you wanna just claim do you but I would rather kill Ircher
mastina n roden u meanIn post 2443, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:If you wanna just claim do you but I would rather kill Ircher
i forgot i made this read yesterday.In post 1610, Tet wrote:Also if STD is town then all of Nora/LLD/Andante probably town with them.
The alternative is that LLD is masterminding the scumteam coordination against StD but that comes with two asterisks.
*It would be super weird to see std getting a bunch of townreads and then decide to attack std directly instead of engaging with the slots townreading std
And
*Having very very limited exposure to LLD scum they seem more of a do their own thing player to reach a scum favored endgoal over trying to coordinate a scum mask towards specific actions.
Which is uh, not great.In post 2587, Ircher wrote:I think Bell scum claimed in the last few pages.
This also feels off. The confident conclusiveness of this answer doesn't add up if the claim is real. The reply is instant, and the only way he could know for sure is if he asked the mod ahead of time, but he doesn't mention that. Very much just feels like a "just trust me bro" response.In post 2450, Ircher wrote:Nope.In post 2449, TheWayItEnds wrote:if your action was roleblocked can you use it tonight? for non consec? im assuming not but worth a check
This is pretty standard practice on this site. I have no clue what you're attempting here.In post 2755, Roden wrote:This also feels off. The confident conclusiveness of this answer doesn't add up if the claim is real. The reply is instant, and the only way he could know for sure is if he asked the mod ahead of time, but he doesn't mention that. Very much just feels like a "just trust me bro" response.
tbh like this is SOLID PROOF ++++++ to me that u are comin from right townie pov cuz i didnt even say shit abt endy cuz i was thinkin like keep that shit in a back pocket for now n no one else said shiiiiiiit but like u picked it right up anyway like either u tmi or u see what i seeIn post 2757, Tet wrote:no i get you. it hurt me putting those sentences together physically. But its also one of those I dont get what they are doing as either alignment kind of things. Versus like Thewayitends playing both sides of the fence and tictacs play, I can see vaguely what they are trying to get done.
Let's be clear here: I was in the process of making it over the course of several days. This is evidenced by the fact that I mentioned such. If I had finished it earlier, I would have posted it earlier.In post 2755, Roden wrote:Somebody mentioned earlier that Ircher's reads list looked townie, but also noted that he essentially had written it ahead of time, which leads me to believe it was just fabricated as a last ditch effort to save himself.
Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eyeIn post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.
You don't think forming reads is scum hunting? Then what do you count as scum hunting? Just because /you/ think my reads are fake and not genuine doesn't mean they are. Try looking at things from both a town Ircher and a scum Ircher perspective because it is self-evident you are only considering the latter here.In post 2755, Roden wrote:He also still isn't scum hunting
That's not true. I just didn't comment; not everything is worth it at the time. Also, the specifics matter here. You called me out for my initial reaction. Roden is calling me out for providing the standard answer to a question that has a standard answer on this site. That's very different; the former is a good faith engagement even if I disagree. The latter is just incredibly bad faith. You both agree the claim is fake; that's fine, sure; however, the way you reach that conclusion matters, and the way Roden is reaching that conclusion is really iffy compared to yours.In post 2761, Malakittens wrote:Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eyeIn post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.
oh dont worry buddy ur scummy enough u could be scumhunting and i wuold still say we fuckin yeet uIn post 2762, Ircher wrote:You don't think forming reads is scum hunting? Then what do you count as scum hunting? Just because /you/ think my reads are fake and not genuine doesn't mean they are. Try looking at things from both a town Ircher and a scum Ircher perspective because it is self-evident you are only considering the latter here.In post 2755, Roden wrote:He also still isn't scum hunting
I was going to hold that read till they responded to me but i doubt i get what i want. Also didnt want to get myself nked but honestly if i'm killed for my read accuracy then the game is winnable anyway.In post 2759, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:tbh like this is SOLID PROOF ++++++ to me that u are comin from right townie pov cuz i didnt even say shit abt endy cuz i was thinkin like keep that shit in a back pocket for now n no one else said shiiiiiiit but like u picked it right up anyway like either u tmi or u see what i seeIn post 2757, Tet wrote:no i get you. it hurt me putting those sentences together physically. But its also one of those I dont get what they are doing as either alignment kind of things. Versus like Thewayitends playing both sides of the fence and tictacs play, I can see vaguely what they are trying to get done.