well the main question is why roden/fire/std make those kills and i have a harder time seeing them doing that than you
but no matter - that was only the tip of my suspicion
what it comes down to is that i wanted to revisit my read on you, because while i could find reasons for townreading other people, when i revisited you i don't have much beyond "vibes". on day 1 i felt datisi was the scummiest in the coalition (and i was right) but it doesn't equate to an explicit townread. the biggest point in favor of ari (agreeing to be left out of the coalition) doesn't mean a whole lot since datisi flipped scum.
you could argue datisi wanting ari in the coalition is not the approach he'd take with a teammate, but i'd say it makes even less sense to take town-ari in, even if she's very pocketed, knowing the possibility he might have to push her (although there's all sorts of odd strategy i can see happening in the coalition phase, it's hard to read into)
so, on a reread what struck me is that datisi and ari both had townreads on each other that they wrote long justifications for that were kind of underdeveloped.
356 1201 (kind of) and
1702 are instances of this from datisi. ari's explanations for her read on datisi are stuff like
302,
1056 and
1595, which feel especially reach-y in their reasoning. the problem with this is it doesn't feel like it's displaying the requisite paranoia - in the large normal where datisi is scum ari was fooled pretty hard by him and i don't really get the sense she'd so willingly throw herself into his arms and not display skepticism, just because she's friends with datisi.
the lack of paranoia is also sharply demonstrated in
1705/
1708 - ari offers a rebuttal to datisi's reasons for townreading her and says they're "not very good", but only makes a joking comment about being pocketed by him - it feels like there's no genuine curiosity toward datisi. it doesn't make much rational sense to respond that way - why would she not be more suspicious of him if his reasons for townreading her are not good?
on a similar note, i find the sequence of
1829 and
1843 to be suspect - ari says she's townreading datisi but is also setting up conditionals for if he's scum. this doesn't really compute to me, i don't think people generally set up possible scum associations for someone they're generally townreading - it reads more like a pre-emptive hedge.
i think if you look at their play day 2 it makes a lot of sense as them trying to powerwolf the game by mutually townreading each other. they both stay hands off on the irrel-mena fight and make vague pushes at skitter. ari mostly doesn't really consider datisi and doesn't really strongly look for scum in the coalition. i think her posting on day 2 is lazy, and i associate that more with scum not trying to make waves. you note that she tries to deflect attention from skitter vs datisi in
1436 toward the tvt fight.
1475 is a pretty gross overture toward voting the menalque wagon that is mostly leaning on people outside the coalition suspecting mena - reads like excuse-making for joining a mis-elim.
i also think there's pretty heavy scum motive in trying to deflect attention onto town-mena when i entered the game calling out datisi and trying to 1v1 him. i think that's relevant because i think that play more heavily fits a scum profile than other players who were less influential/more indecisive. i think trying to save a partner in a 1v1 by deflecting onto town is something scum-ari would do.
you can argue that yes, ari did eventually shift to push datisi, but that was after i went so far as to selfvote and mena had a toxic meltdown that made him likely unflippable. we also know
for a fact
that someone who is alive bussed datisi. so i think putting due skepticism of everyone alive through that lens is necessary - at some point datisi realized he was not endgaming and his partner had to bus. this is undisputable fact. so the question of timing becomes a relevant one. and i think datisi suddenly making gestures at suspecting ari feels antispewy in a way. i think that if you look back, datisi was much more keen on arguing against skitter when she was expressing suspicion of him than he was in arguing back against ari.
and this is kinda notable because earlier in the game he was defensive of the notion he was "townlocking" ari in
1868 - i think if it was a confident tmi read like the one on menalque he just rides with it. and this is
particularly
interesting because of this post:
In post 1938, Datisi wrote: In post 1935, Irrelephant11 wrote: In post 1933, Datisi wrote:yep, i reread the case and i feel like i could write another wall on why i don't think the reasons are Good but i also don't really think that would be much helpful for anyone
Okay for the sake of this conversation which if skitter/ari is more likely scum fypov
skitter
it's like, i think there are way more things that i can point out being +town for ari than i can for skitter. yes i know most of my reasons got shot down as bad but i don't think they all are. i don't think scum!ari plays d1 the way she did and i don't think she offers to sheep and be out of the coalition unless she's like, 100% sure her partner is already inside. and if that's the case, then
her partner has to be within you/skitt i think, which means it's better to flip there first either way then re-eval ari after the flip
i know i'm town. i know skitter is town. i think the way datisi tries to deflect from ari here is decently likely to be partner-indicative.