2. ya get the fuck out of here (I actually think this doesn't lend credibility to Titus being scum, it might just be an example of her bad reads - she scumread me, for fuck's sake)
3. ....
4. ........................
5 that's uh.. that's... yeah...
6. bullshit
However I'm still going to vote Performer.
He's been a wallflower this entire game in terms of gamesolving, no solid stances because all of his stances are so flexible that they can switch at any time for any reason. He does not commit to anything that he can't weasel out of. If you don't believe me, read his ISO.
That is all.
VOTE: Performer
Performer also soft-defended Vedith.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:53 am
by Titus
I should have included a caveat there that forced gambits are not in that category.
Well we are going to have problems on wagon selection because I was the counter to Vedith so my wagon is the natural place to look for scum.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:55 am
by Zachstralkita
Titus wrote:I should have included a caveat there that forced gambits are not in that category.
Well we are going to have problems on wagon selection because I was the counter to Vedith so my wagon is the natural place to look for scum.
It would have been a fucking US Government level caveat considering no one held a gun to your head and made you do that gambit on account of Dunn being so obvtown.
If he died last night it would have been all for nothing.
I also disagree, scum probably bussed Vedith to look better
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:56 am
by Wake1
Titus in my opinion should be the lynch for today.
Before Vedith started messing up on that slot there was Nosferatu, and what we should do is pay attention to all of the player interactions involving Nosferatu.
Throughout Nosferatu's existence Zach has been fine with voting/lynching Nosferatu.
Take note in my 2753 that Lapsa was right about Nosferatu in 419, 739, and 1036.
Transcend was favorable to Nosferatu in 179 and 965.
Titus refused to vote for Nosferatu in 1138 because I voted for Nosferatu.
I'm townreading Zach and Scumreading Titus right now.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:59 am
by Titus
Zach, the game rules made me. It's a pretty small one.
If Dunn died, the gambit would be fine. I would have been proven right and the fact I couldn't defend him from lynch makes my actions more understandable.
Scum bussed Vedith when they could lol policy lynch me? No. My wagon was chock full of scum.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:01 am
by Titus
In post 2782, Wake1 wrote:Titus in my opinion should be the lynch for today.
Before Vedith started messing up on that slot there was Nosferatu, and what we should do is pay attention to all of the player interactions involving Nosferatu.
Throughout Nosferatu's existence Zach has been fine with voting/lynching Nosferatu.
Take note in my 2753 that Lapsa was right about Nosferatu in 419, 739, and 1036.
Transcend was favorable to Nosferatu in 179 and 965.
Titus refused to vote for Nosferatu in 1138 because I voted for Nosferatu.
I'm townreading Zach and Scumreading Titus right now.
^^ needs to die to progress the game. Tunnelling obvious town again. Keeping game state stagnant again. Ignores reality that Vedith was my counter.
Ignores my vote giving momentum for Vedith lynch.
He's going to be a chump and just be scummy noise all game.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:01 am
by Zachstralkita
I'm not against wagoning Wake because Titus wants it. I'm against wagoning Wake cause he is super fucking town.
If you had to kill a townie, you're better off killing me. In fact, you're better off killing shannon who
claimed VT
to help us out!
Yes, I'm hard defending the shit out of him right now. I do not care.
Titus wrote:Zach, the game rules made me. It's a pretty small one.
If Dunn died, the gambit would be fine. I would have been proven right and the fact I couldn't defend him from lynch makes my actions more understandable.
Scum bussed Vedith when they could lol policy lynch me? No. My wagon was chock full of scum.
Whatever, I'm not arguing that shit now.
WHY would they policy lynch you? What exactly have you DONE? If you had your way Vedith would be kicking his feet up sipping a fucking pina colada right now and one of Varsoon, Sickofit (beeboy) [Town], Wake, or Me would be dead. All townies.
Scum bussed Vedith for towncred. There could have been scum on BOTH of your wagons.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:02 am
by beeboy
Bad Titus.
Whakay is town aligned from the 6 pages of this game I read.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:07 am
by Titus
Beeboy, Not sure what you're reading but continuing a wagon scum want and cherry picking to do it is not townie...at all.
Zach, why wouldn't scum policy lynch me? Zero content, zero risk. Scum is the main counter in Vedith. Your Varsoon and Wake reads such. Beeboy is likely town. Also look at podog when I make that statement. Lapsa (town) said he'd tunnel me to no end. Easy content less pushes is where scum are.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:08 am
by Wake1
Nosferatu
tried to cast doubt on implosion in 178, and implosion said in 295 that
Titus wrote:
Zach, why wouldn't scum policy lynch me? Zero content, zero risk. Scum is the main counter in Vedith. Your Varsoon and Wake reads such. Beeboy is likely town. Also look at podog when I make that statement. Lapsa (town) said he'd tunnel me to no end. Easy content less pushes is where scum are.
If scum want to look better able to defend themselves they wouldn't go for an easy lynch.
But again, they could have been split up on both of the wagons. It does not have to be black or white.
Your tunnel on Wake is the worst possible thing that could happen this game. Varsoon isn't a good choice either. I urge you to re-analyze your decisions.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:10 am
by Wake1
In post 2786, beeboy wrote:Bad Titus.
Whakay is town aligned from the 6 pages of this game I read.
It's
Wake
.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:11 am
by Wake1
Beeboy, Zach, Boem, please join my wagon against Titus.
Your actions will mean a lot as the game progresses.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:14 am
by Zachstralkita
Wake, do you think scum!Titus would go out of her way to fakeclaim to save DUNN on the grounds that DUNN is OBVTOWN and also connect him to her by fakeclaiming MASONS, then RETRACT THE CLAIM and openly tunnel the same people who were voting her? Where is the sense in that?
Answer me this.
I don't and that's why I'm hesitant to vote Titus. But if the wagons were Wake and Titus, I would not hesitate to vote Titus.
BUT THAT WON'T HAPPEN BECAUSE WE'RE VOTING PERFORMER.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:15 am
by Wake1
I need answers on who got in Lapsa's way against nosferatu.
Titus wrote:
Zach, why wouldn't scum policy lynch me? Zero content, zero risk. Scum is the main counter in Vedith. Your Varsoon and Wake reads such. Beeboy is likely town. Also look at podog when I make that statement. Lapsa (town) said he'd tunnel me to no end. Easy content less pushes is where scum are.
If scum want to look better able to defend themselves they wouldn't go for an easy lynch.
But again, they could have been split up on both of the wagons. It does not have to be black or white.
Your tunnel on Wake is the worst possible thing that could happen this game. Varsoon isn't a good choice either. I urge you to re-analyze your decisions.
Oh, I see more do what I want threats.
Why are you intent on having me lie? Your choice is suddenly townread people hellbent on being scummy or else.
From MY perspective, Varsoon has tunnelled exclusively on town, CCed solely so that I would remain lynchable AND tunneled me with no comment on anyone else. Varsoon fits the profile of how I scumhunt on who should be scum. So why are you townreading him?
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:16 am
by Zachstralkita
Basically what I'm saying Wake, is for Titus to be scum Dunn has to be scum 99/100 times.
Titus wrote:
Zach, why wouldn't scum policy lynch me? Zero content, zero risk. Scum is the main counter in Vedith. Your Varsoon and Wake reads such. Beeboy is likely town. Also look at podog when I make that statement. Lapsa (town) said he'd tunnel me to no end. Easy content less pushes is where scum are.
If scum want to look better able to defend themselves they wouldn't go for an easy lynch.
But again, they could have been split up on both of the wagons. It does not have to be black or white.
Your tunnel on Wake is the worst possible thing that could happen this game. Varsoon isn't a good choice either. I urge you to re-analyze your decisions.
Oh, I see more do what I want threats.
Why are you intent on having me lie? Your choice is suddenly townread people hellbent on being scummy or else.
From MY perspective, Varsoon has tunnelled exclusively on town, CCed solely so that I would remain lynchable AND tunneled me with no comment on anyone else. Varsoon fits the profile of how I scumhunt on who should be scum. So why are you townreading him?
Do what you want but I will derail the lynch by any means necessary. Have your pride take the backseat for a little bit.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:17 am
by Wake1
In post 2792, Zachstralkita wrote:Wake, do you think scum!Titus would go out of her way to fakeclaim to save DUNN on the grounds that DUNN is OBVTOWN and also connect him to her by fakeclaiming MASONS, then RETRACT THE CLAIM and openly tunnel the same people who were voting her? Where is the sense in that?
Answer me this.
I don't and that's why I'm hesitant to vote Titus. But if the wagons were Wake and Titus, I would not hesitate to vote Titus.
BUT THAT WON'T HAPPEN BECAUSE WE'RE VOTING PERFORMER.
Listen to me please.
Titus is more skilled than you know. I can never be certain what she is doing. Do not underestimate Titus.
At least vote her to pressure her. You don't have to commit to a lynch, but at least get some pressure on her so we can stir up even more invaluable actions and reactions we can analyze later.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:19 am
by Titus
P.S. Wake's recent posting is blatant psychological manipulation. By putting Titus, Nos and the color red together, he wants players to associate these things together and is trying to use underhanded tactics and ignore what goes against him.
Oh wow and now Wake is trying to get town to vote me while abandoning any pretense I can be proven scum because he cherrypicks and even Zach knows it.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:20 am
by Zachstralkita
Wake88 wrote:
In post 2792, Zachstralkita wrote:Wake, do you think scum!Titus would go out of her way to fakeclaim to save DUNN on the grounds that DUNN is OBVTOWN and also connect him to her by fakeclaiming MASONS, then RETRACT THE CLAIM and openly tunnel the same people who were voting her? Where is the sense in that?
Answer me this.
I don't and that's why I'm hesitant to vote Titus. But if the wagons were Wake and Titus, I would not hesitate to vote Titus.
BUT THAT WON'T HAPPEN BECAUSE WE'RE VOTING PERFORMER.
Listen to me please.
Titus is more skilled than you know. I can never be certain what she is doing. Do not underestimate Titus.
At least vote her to pressure her. You don't have to commit to a lynch, but at least get some pressure on her so we can stir up even more invaluable actions and reactions we can analyze later.
Hey, my name's Paul and this shit's between y'all.
Spoiler:
I'm gonna stay on Performer. I want pressure on Performer. No one is going to go for that lynch without me. Performer scum.
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:21 am
by Titus
Wake is trying to sell you that what cannot be controlled = proscum. Bad move. Scum seek control of a game state. Town seek to remove scum.
@Zach, I don't care for a Performer lynch. Just nope. I will get out of your way because you saw Nos first, but I am not lending my vote because I think you are wrong.