Mafiascum.net

tris has like 0 pressure

why would I need to defend her in the first place

In post 2766, Xtoxm wrote:shes intentionally making the game unplayable

this needs to be unpacked more

In post 2758, skitter30 wrote:

In post 2615, Chara wrote:i don't think Creature is scum here. if there's a good argument i'll listen,

but being underwhelming on a replace in a big game isn't a scumtell.

i can see his thought process well enough, and i've played with Creature enough that at this point i think i can tell how he's feeling about a game.

i mean, sure, but it's been like ... a week since he repped in? maybe longer? and he's still being underwhelming

I think my reads have been pretty solid though.

In post 2766, Xtoxm wrote:ank is hard defending tris and lining up mislynches
tris is the correct lynch but i'd be willing to cut the head off the snake and lynch ank today
shes intentionally making the game unplayable

lol?

welcome back skitter.

i'm not confident on tris town at all so i'd love if you could convince me on that one, Ank.

In post 2748, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm looking for scum between you and succinct at the moment. Has that not been clear?

no, i can see what you're saying you're doing, but how is that vote useful?
all your recent posts are just replies to me. it doesn't feel like sorting.

Are you basing that off Xtoxms post, Chara

Flubber: what's your opinion on Xtoxm?

pedit: i am, he reminded me. i thought tris was a little towny earlier but that fell away with her lack of sorting since Brigitte. her being town has a lot to do with Xtoxm scum so i'd like to be sure on that front.

In post 2781, Chara wrote:

In post 2748, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm looking for scum between you and succinct at the moment. Has that not been clear?

no, i can see what you're saying you're doing, but how is that vote useful?
all your recent posts are just replies to me. it doesn't feel like sorting.

Part pressure, part not letting it go to waste, part not being impressed by succinct's current responses. Basic mafia 101 stuff. This is useless shade.

As is that my recent posts don't "feel" like sorting. Considering they're all answering your questions and having to clarify my previous posting, it shows you're asking pointless questions.

And to bring this whole thing full circle, your brigette vote was still awful.

Xtoxm pushing tris here after Brigitte flipped town after pretty carelessly choosing to keep his vote on Brigitte even while the tris wagon built up, with absolutely no comment on any of tris's posting beforehand, is either lazy or scum.
and calling out Ank for "lining up mislynches" when he's literally done that is a major lack of gamestate awareness, same as his shading of Ank without any real evidence when she's a pretty impossible lynch at this point.
he just isn't really doing anything. if he's town he needs to get in this game. if he's scum he's coasting. i think it's the latter.
okay with lynching Flubber.

I need to respond to succinct but the way he quoted stuff makes that hard to do on mobile

In post 2784, Flubbernugget wrote:Part pressure, part not letting it go to waste, part not being impressed by succinct's current responses. Basic mafia 101 stuff. This is useless shade.

and this is different from skitter's vote on you how...?

(this post would be actual shade to you. you're welcome!)

The fact that I didnt vote outside of my scum list?

Why would you ask stupid question and think that's okay because you then say it's shade?

VOTE: chara

That question was so ignorant of the issue brought up by a host of players in the game that I'm fully convinced your arguments are in bad faith.

voting a player to sort them is such a basic thing to do. of the things that have made me suspicious of skitter this game the vote on you does not even register. you voted Succint to have something to do with your vote/try to sort between players. skitter's vote had the same base reasoning.

not to mention that the consistency of voting within one's scumlist is one of the easiest things for scum to do, so doing so or not doing so is not all that informative.

*Succinct. i keep doing that.

You keep pushing this narrative (without wanting to actually say it) that I have some massive suspicion of skitter when it was really just weird voting patterns worth noting.

You're right that it's easy for scum to do, but sometimes they still slip up.

but i don't think you have this massive suspicion of skitter.

i brought it up in relation to her because i wanted you to defend your Succinct vote. to me a sorting vote is a sorting vote. you said you wanted to sort between me and Succinct, and skitter said she wanted to sort you. i don't see the issue.

could you answer my question about Xtoxm?

Try it this way,

Why sort who you dont suspect?

Let me find what you asked about them.

Oh that was the urap2 slot.

And they've been a non-entity since replacing in

I'd lynch that.

In post 2794, Flubbernugget wrote:Try it this way,

Why sort who you dont suspect?

Let me find what you asked about them.

i like to sort in nulls. someone you already suspect.. well, you suspect them. someone who is null could either be a townread for your PoE or a gap in your solve.

Right so this whole argument was semantics. Are you done trying to push me over minutiae?

you say that like this conversation was pointless to me.
VOTE: Xtoxm

I say it like your point was only to *look* town.