Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:57 am
Aight. I'll wait until you have time to case it.
Generally speaking (i.e. w.o. reverting to my personal meta) I can see that. The question(s) are:In post 2739, popsofctown wrote:Can you see from where I'm sitting how it could look like you're trying to pocket two players with this, and I know you don't even TR at least one of them
In post 2728, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.
In post 2729, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.
In post 2730, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.
Why did you spam thisIn post 2731, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.
That's if the Tracker targeted the "Rolestopped" player directly.In post 2741, Jingle wrote:Uh... yeah there is.In post 2717, callforjudgement wrote:Huh, I was planning to go by the Normal ruling but apparently there isn't one.
From the tracker wiki page: “If a Tracker is somehow blocked from their action (by Roleblocker, Jailkeeper, Rolestopper, Ascetic, or Commuter), they should receive a "No Result" pm, rather than a "did not see anything" pm.”
In post 2741, Jingle wrote:Uh... yeah there is.In post 2717, callforjudgement wrote:Huh, I was planning to go by the Normal ruling but apparently there isn't one.
From the tracker wiki page: “If a Tracker is somehow blocked from their action (by Roleblocker, Jailkeeper, Rolestopper, Ascetic, or Commuter), they should receive a "No Result" pm, rather than a "did not see anything" pm.”
In post 2742, Jingle wrote:TBC, if you’re resolving it differently I have no issue with that, but it is a deviation from normal guidelines.
Wrong account broIn post 2744, Jingle wrote:Oh shit, nvm I’m being dumb.
It was an accident.In post 2782, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 2728, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.In post 2729, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.In post 2730, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.Why did you spam thisIn post 2731, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.
Yeah, but most would taste it.In post 2768, Bingle wrote:Sure. You can have paperback writer, no one noms shit for that anyway because players don't ever read the flavor.
Anyway why do you not fight being stumped? I would think you'd hate itIn post 2786, Creature wrote:It was an accident.In post 2782, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 2728, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.In post 2729, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.In post 2730, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.Why did you spam thisIn post 2731, Creature wrote:Not sure what I'll do as a treestump, but whatever.
Atleast I get to post reads through the whole game.
Good! I'll give you a head start then.In post 2789, popsofctown wrote:I'm gonna "campaign" against it when I get to a PC and explain the assoc thing
In post 53, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:My guts says Cheeky should get the IC role.
In post 242, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Scum are gonna try to make quick work of whoever they feel they can push easily, and I don’t think we have the luxury to wait around for someone to be confirmed town in a game like this. I think giving it someone who is unlikely to be lynched or night killed is much more optimal. It could force scum to kill a potential endgame option earlier then they would like to.In post 87, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why?In post 53, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:My guts says Cheeky should get the IC role.
I don’t see you as lynch bait and I don’t see you as a high priority night kill. What I can see however is a world in which scum may leave you alive because you’ve been pocketed or just pose no threat to them. You’re pretty solid as town though and I think scum don’t want to deal with a Cheeky that’s going to be taken out of the lynch pool late game.
In post 391, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Timid = Lil Uzi Vert?In post 322, Almost50 wrote:This is the second iteration. I made minor changes overall. I still haven't changed the stronger roles though.
Timid = Hidden Happiness (Shadoweh/MariaR hydra)
Vanilla = Iconeum
Inventor = popsofctown
Day 5 Innocent Child = Oversoul
Miller = apthet
Neighbour = Nero Cain
1-shot Gladiator = momo
Day 3 King = Vecna
Night 1 Universal Backup = CheekyTeeky
Neighbour = Almost50
Odd-Night Motion Detector = Gamma Emerald
Macho = Lil Uzi Vert
Inactive = Saudade
Compulsive Quitter = Sothis Stefon Styx (RadiantCowbells/Baezu hydra)
Vanilla = Oversoul
Inventor = ?
Day 5 Innocent Child = CheekyTeeky
Miller = Momo
Neighbour = ?
1-shot Gladiator = popsofctown
Day 3 King = ?
Night 1 Universal Backup = Hidden Happiness
Neighbour = Vecna
Odd-Night Motion Detector = apthet
Macho = Gamma Emerald
Inactive = Saudade
Compulsive Quitter = Sothis Stefon Styx
This is what I have so far.
In post 591, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Cheeky might be scum here.
In post 1091, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:If we are getting cold feet on Titus, I can compromise on Cheeky.In post 1072, popsofctown wrote:Who's the scum then, Uzi?In post 1069, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Why aren’t we lynching scum yet?
He posited CheekyTeeky D5 IC frequently early in the game, and the justification he gave for it doesn't really seem to generate towncred and seems pretty authentic. Giving a teammate D5 IC is a Bad Thing. Some of LUV's mechanical comments this game have been so offbase that I almost want to consider it bad!scum!LilUziVert but I think he'd manage to figure out that this cops his scumpartner on day 5. It seems really plausible that people might just say "hey yeah CheekyTeeky's meta fits D5 IC plenty" and that everyone slots her in that way in all the proposals for the rest of the game and it'd be a really strange move before the rest of the game developed.In post 1099, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:@Offical Proposal:
1-Shot Gladiator: Almost50
Inactive: Saudade
Day 5 Innocent Child: Oversoul
Inventor: popsofctown
Day 3 King: Apthet
Macho: Gamma Emerald
Miller: Momo
Odd-Night Motion Detector: Lil Uzi Vert
Neighbor: Titus
Neighbor: Vecna
Vanilla: Iconeum
Timid: Hidden Happiness
N1 Universal Backup: Nero Cain
Compulsive Quitter: CheekyTeeky
I think I'll get to be a town leader or something.In post 2788, Gamma Emerald wrote:Anyway why do you not fight being stumped? I would think you'd hate it
CheekyTeeky would you say I am one of your favorite mafia players, or would you say I am one of yourIn post 2794, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why are you so obsessed with me? Go tunnel someone else with your tinfoil theories.
In post 2794, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why are you so obsessed with me?
Yeah this is why I expected more objection out of youIn post 2796, Creature wrote:However, on the other side, my games as publicly confirmed town have been atrocious.