In post 2757, Wooper wrote:weirdly nsg is playing something closer to openwolf than I'd expect to see from her but I also think this has been outside her scumrange...? Anyone else? Am I drunk?
In post 2688, Volpe14 wrote:It's my subtle way of implying that it's either A50/Wooper/Teacher today and I very much want teacher.
Therefore stop vanity voting bingle so close to deadline...?
I'm tired of this day phase already, I want flips to see how much in the right track I am.
calling it a "vanity vote" when his wagon is tied for second largest is odd
What the...NSG?
When I posted this he had 1 vote while the other ones had 4. I don't really know how it is right now but voting bingle at that stage was a vanity vote yes.
there are no bingle votes between when you posted this and the next votecount. as far as i can tell, you are incorrect.
In post 2693, pisskop wrote:The thing about C9++ and similar setups is that they have a finite amount of setups and are balanced according to their own power.
In post 2687, skitter30 wrote:Jingle i'm p sure you do, in fact, know why i want you lyncjed, and that you know why i dont want to talk about it, and the fact that you keep bringing it up is why i think you're scumclaiming
See, the problem with the case being "You know why I'm voting you" is that when I don't know why you're voting me there's literally nothing I can say. Either you're town who is laughably wrong and bad or scum whose case is bullshit and doesn't want to talk about it.
So let's make this a 1v1.
VOTE: Skitter
Lynch me. I'm a VT. Lynch Skitter tomorrow unless she has a damn good reason for all of this.
In post 2695, pisskop wrote:I am not a fan of 'lets not lynch a claimed pr', though I do think it adds weight to a lynch.
I am however a fan of not lynching a semi or fully provable role. Besides, I never found teach super scummy.
In post 2771, Wooper wrote:gonna sound mean but I feel like nsg is just being **slightly** negligent in her solving and I think it looks like misplaced effort but like, just don't locktown her too early
I guess I'm kinda wondering if you'll be reevaluating reads + pushing someone softing TPR while waxing poetic about how mathdino would be baffled had me thinking
I don't really think you're scum tbh but I'd hate to have you mislynch me and not have said I'm not 100% sure on town-you
I'm not sure this is within your scumrange which is why I think you're town. but I'm not convinced your approach to d1 is all that pro-town? probs best way to explain it
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:46 am
by skitter30
I actually havent been picking up on your softing either
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:48 am
by Wooper
Mostly meant her pushing me explicitly after softing / without much evaluation on teacher
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:48 am
by Volpe14
I didn't notice?
If I remember right that post was a quick check-in while I was in a break from work to eat. I really don't think that many people switched to him by that time though, maybe 1 or max 2.
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:48 am
by Volpe14
Actually, what you want to accomplish with this line of questioning NSG?
It's silly.
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:49 am
by northsidegal
i don't usually go looking for power role softs as town without some sort of reason and i haven't naturally picked up on anything from you
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:49 am
by northsidegal
In post 2786, Volpe14 wrote:Actually, what you want to accomplish with this line of questioning NSG?
It's silly.
what line of questioning
the thing about "vanity voting"?
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:50 am
by Wooper
I mean she's scumsiding so why don't we just lynch nsg? VOTE: nsg
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:51 am
by Wooper
In post 2787, northsidegal wrote:i don't usually go looking for power role softs as town without some sort of reason and i haven't naturally picked up on anything from you
again I was referring to your explicit push after Bungle pointed out I was really obviously softing :c
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:51 am
by Wooper
this is the kind of negligence I'm talking about :/
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:51 am
by skitter30
In post 2789, Wooper wrote:I mean she's scumsiding so why don't we just lynch nsg? VOTE: nsg
Um no
What is this even
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:52 am
by northsidegal
In post 2789, Wooper wrote:I mean she's scumsiding so why don't we just lynch nsg? VOTE: nsg