Mafiascum.net

In post 2528, marcistar wrote:my results useless

but yes u did visit pooky

Or is this on NM?

I'm reading things out of order on my phone and struggling to figure it out

Marci, who did you track?

In post 2772, Lukewarm wrote:I found it in a math blade post

Loyal bg

In post 2528, marcistar wrote:my results useless

but yes u did visit pooky

So the track result that marci is claiming is that chungus visited pooky the night that pooky died?

How many shots?

Marci tracked me to Pooky. I am a voyeur who claimed correctly I would visit Pooky.

In post 2534, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:I did visit pooky.

i think you fail to connect the dots of frogster's flip

Did he show up as a protective on your vouyer result?

If yes, isn't he clear?

If no, isn't he guilty?

Wait, if he is loyal does he visit and his action fail? Or does he never visit?

Asking mod

yes i did math unfortunately

In post 2777, Lukewarm wrote:Wait, if he is loyal does he visit and his action fail? Or does he never visit?

Never visits

It’s why you and NM were supposed to attempt visit Pooky.
If Pooky was town I confirm you
If Pooky was scum he’d be dead.

It’s also partially why I want to know if you have more shots.

I am a VT, so I don't have e shots.

I replaced std not chungus

In post 2782, Lukewarm wrote:I am a VT, so I don't have e shots.

I replaced std not chungus

Math.exe has borked

Math.exe restarted

My bad. Got the claim though. Since you read first could be forced.

Meh. I am okay with a BGC elim I think. Shines a lot into things I think.

In post 2782, Lukewarm wrote:I am a VT, so I don't have e shots.

I replaced std not chungus

math seems to think 54667776567 invests can co exist but 2 protectives cant
i think is why he has poe of either me or chungus

but i tr xhungus T_T i dont think they were playing me like a violin at all..

No reason to elim a loyal bg claim. Matching BCG's target with Math confirms BCG and that target as sharing alignments. No match means different alignments.

I can then check bcg's role.

If a loyal attempts to target another player of opposite alignment, they are considered role blocked (according to the wiki).

Also, everyone is Pooky and let me know if their interactions with BCG seem aligned. I'm think I'm getting cold feet on this one.

UNVOTE:

NM, let's look elsewhere.

In post 2788, Toogeloo wrote:everyone is Pooky

ebeop: everyone "iso" Pooky.

In post 2784, marcistar wrote:

In post 2782, Lukewarm wrote:I am a VT, so I don't have e shots.

I replaced std not chungus

math seems to think 54667776567 invests can co exist but 2 protectives cant
i think is why he has poe of either me or chungus

but i tr xhungus T_T i dont think they were playing me like a violin at all..

Correct. I do.

You say it is like hyperbole. I think scum would have had some sort of defense against a multi shot disloyal vig.

UNVOTE:

Bahhh

In post 2785, Titus wrote:No reason to elim a loyal bg claim. Matching BCG's target with Math confirms BCG and that target as sharing alignments. No match means different alignments.

BGC says he has no more shots before replacing out.
Marci makes more sense mechanically to be scum
BGC makes more sense by play given he wanted to confirm Pooky before NM came out as disloyal vig.

In post 2792, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2785, Titus wrote:No reason to elim a loyal bg claim. Matching BCG's target with Math confirms BCG and that target as sharing alignments. No match means different alignments.

BGC says he has no more shots before replacing out.
Marci makes more sense mechanically to be scum
BGC makes more sense by play given he wanted to confirm Pooky before NM came out as disloyal vig.

Fuck mech. VCA.

If marci was a scum doctor, marci likely heals Pooky and claims elsewhere.

In post 2793, Titus wrote:

In post 2792, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2785, Titus wrote:No reason to elim a loyal bg claim. Matching BCG's target with Math confirms BCG and that target as sharing alignments. No match means different alignments.

BGC says he has no more shots before replacing out.
Marci makes more sense mechanically to be scum
BGC makes more sense by play given he wanted to confirm Pooky before NM came out as disloyal vig.

Fuck mech. VCA.

If marci was a scum doctor, marci likely heals Pooky and claims elsewhere.

That doesn’t last long at all if not in her elim that day or future days.

Marci would show as an invest and a protective action.

I would get one killing, tracking, and protective.

I confirm NM town if I am alive and then we still elim Pooky and *might miselim BGC* but short of that invest also claiming it’s dead.

To save Pooky scum would have to kill me

We probably elim Pooky in that world as I have a guilty.

I suggest we visit BGC in that world, likely get a confirm

Then we know we are looking for scum invest and protect

In which rolecops lead to Marci

you also said furtives role makes sense for scum to have but look where that wound u up