UNVOTE: i would be willing to lynch in Lalendra/Scion/Rob
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:14 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 2797, PenguinPower wrote:Um. He faked claimed mason and then didn't give a reason when asked why he did it? Didn't really care until mason were actually confirmed.
Yes, action is bad.
So tell me about the scum motivation in the action.
In post 2705, Lalendra wrote:UNVOTE:
I would like to hear from the mason partner this dayphase.
Uhh then why unvote?
Because I don't think he's scum? Nor do I believe that being at L-7 is going to pressure the mason partner into claiming.
If you don't think he's scum then why do you want the mason to claim?
Also what changed your mind?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:25 am
by Lalendra
In post 2712, Flavor Leaf wrote:It is blatant role fishing, and if you’re town who “needs a second mason to claim” that’s just bad. It’s a fucking mason claim. It’ll come out.
Is it not better to have confirmed masons so that we can narrow the lynch pool by knowing who is definitely town? I understand that also means that scum will know who the masons are, but scum already know who is town so what's the difference?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:26 am
by Lalendra
In post 2714, Scioness Sajj wrote:Mylo has specifically chosen PP because he knew PP wouldn't be able to defend themselves against opportunistic vote with no reasoning? Is that what you are saying here?
Yes.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:29 am
by Ircher
Spoiler: Current Voting History
Spoiler: Previous Voting History
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:38 am
by Ircher
Creature has changed their mind about replacing out.
Wait, I'm so confused. So Rob isn't really a mason, he claimed mason with FL just to call FL's bluff, and then FL didn't react? hmm. This changes things.
VOTE: Flavor Leaf
Powertown in the first post refers to flavorleaf. I don't really get how Rob fakeclaiming would change her read on FL from powertown to scum.
FL sounded powertown. Then I didn't like how he didn't react to Rob's fake claim, because it seemed to me that if he was really a mason, he would have had a reaction. Then I decided he probably was really a mason because he explained that he was just making that post as he was heading into work and didn't have the chance to react, so I unvoted.
FFS, I really don't understand why people have such a hard time following my reasoning in EVERY GODDAMN GAME
Wait, I'm so confused. So Rob isn't really a mason, he claimed mason with FL just to call FL's bluff, and then FL didn't react? hmm. This changes things.
VOTE: Flavor Leaf
Powertown in the first post refers to flavorleaf. I don't really get how Rob fakeclaiming would change her read on FL from powertown to scum.
FL sounded powertown. Then I didn't like how he didn't react to Rob's fake claim, because it seemed to me that if he was really a mason, he would have had a reaction. Then I decided he probably was really a mason because he explained that he was just making that post as he was heading into work and didn't have the chance to react, so I unvoted.
FFS, I really don't understand why people have such a hard time following my reasoning in EVERY GODDAMN GAME
Wow this last sentence looks like the fakest outrage in the history of outrages.
You just post an unvote without saying a damn thing about why and complain that people aren't following your reasoning?
In post 2804, Lalendra wrote:
Is it not better to have confirmed masons so that we can narrow the lynch pool by knowing who is definitely town? I understand that also means that scum will know who the masons are, but scum already know who is town so what's the difference?
So do you believe it's correct play for all masons and ICs to claim immediately on day 1?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:01 am
by Scioness Sajj
reading pages 105-107. I'm fine with the mason claim considering how Hopkirk approached it in 2648. They are more likely town than gambiting.
GR also seems town for the gambit alone.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:12 am
by Gamma Emerald
So I checked back on the Android unvoters and there were less than I thought, only GoldRob and creature who is obvtown, and I'm pretty sure GR wasn't on the Flavor wagon so my theory about overlap there is probably wrong
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:15 am
by Lalendra
In post 2810, JarJarDrinks wrote:Wow this last sentence looks like the fakest outrage in the history of outrages.
You just post an unvote without saying a damn thing about why and complain that people aren't following your reasoning?
I really couldn't care less if you think it's fake, and yeah, when I've already explained myself multiple times it's getting a little old.
In post 2804, Lalendra wrote:
Is it not better to have confirmed masons so that we can narrow the lynch pool by knowing who is definitely town? I understand that also means that scum will know who the masons are, but scum already know who is town so what's the difference?
So do you believe it's correct play for all masons and ICs to claim immediately on day 1?
I think if we already have one mason claimed, there's little point in waiting for the other to claim, and since you are of the same mind, I'm not sure why you're arguing with me on this.
In post 2810, JarJarDrinks wrote:Wow this last sentence looks like the fakest outrage in the history of outrages.
You just post an unvote without saying a damn thing about why and complain that people aren't following your reasoning?
I really couldn't care less if you think it's fake, and yeah, when
I've already explained myself multiple times
it's getting a little old.
links?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:17 am
by Lalendra
Also the Hopkirk claim was underwhelming, I'm glad he claimed but I was already townreading him so I was hoping it would be some other slot that would give me more info. I guess at least now I don't have to worry about wavering on that slot later.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:18 am
by Flavor Leaf
Lalendra, I didn’t have a single post in between. You just jumped from one point to another. It’s not that there wasn’t a reaction, i just wasn’t around
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:19 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 2818, Lalendra wrote:Also the Hopkirk claim was underwhelming, I'm glad he claimed but I was already townreading him so I was hoping it would be some other slot that would give me more info. I guess at least now I don't have to worry about wavering on that slot later.
Yet you all forced the second mason to claim. There was literally no reason for it.
It would have EASILY been confirmed in a day or two. Never do that again.
In post 2810, JarJarDrinks wrote:Wow this last sentence looks like the fakest outrage in the history of outrages.
You just post an unvote without saying a damn thing about why and complain that people aren't following your reasoning?
I really couldn't care less if you think it's fake, and yeah, when
I've already explained myself multiple times
it's getting a little old.
links?
I explained my reasoning in both the original posts, and my responses to your questions. I'm not going to waste my time quoting my own ISO, go back and read it if there's something you don't get.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:21 am
by Lalendra
In post 2819, Flavor Leaf wrote:Lalendra, I didn’t have a single post in between. You just jumped from one point to another. It’s not that there wasn’t a reaction, i just wasn’t around
And you not being around is why I changed my SR on you.
In post 2818, Lalendra wrote:Also the Hopkirk claim was underwhelming, I'm glad he claimed but I was already townreading him so I was hoping it would be some other slot that would give me more info. I guess at least now I don't have to worry about wavering on that slot later.
Yet you all forced the second mason to claim. There was literally no reason for it.
It would have EASILY been confirmed in a day or two. Never do that again.
We have yet to see whether it's a good or bad thing for town.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:21 am
by Flavor Leaf
Lalendra is very mislynchable. I think I’d rather let her live a day or so.