Mafiascum.net

Although Andres did unvote Anya from E-1.

Well at least Anya can be confirmed tonight with the JK dead.
If not, thats a scum claim anyway.

When I'm home ill go over the 1v1 me and Nom had and see who says what.
That's not a role scum we're willing to give up day 1.

In post 2801, VFP wrote:Well at least Anya can be confirmed tonight with the JK dead.
If not, thats a scum claim anyway.

She claimed two shot :I

Doesn't a rolebloxk stop you from using it, not stop the result?
Anya is still 2 shot.

[quote=Wiki]
When an X-Shot role is blocked, the shot is not refunded; the player still counts as having "paid for" their role use, but the actual role is otherwise considered to not have happened (so, e.g., Trackers and Watchers will not be able to see the blocked role being used).
[/quote]

Wiki wrote: When an X-Shot role is blocked, the shot is not refunded; the player still counts as having "paid for" their role use, but the actual role is otherwise considered to not have happened (so, e.g., Trackers and Watchers will not be able to see the blocked role being used).

Attempt #2

Well thats a shame.
I guess I'll just stick with your read on Anya.

ssbm, what do you think about Titus and Andres?

so u dont think the designers made the enabler be opposite alignments

i was a mailman enabler in a game that had only scum mailman

In post 2810, Rathe wrote:so u dont think the designers made the enabler be opposite alignments

Typically when an enabler acts on a different alignment's role it would be to reduce its power. So, for instance, the town mailman enabler disables scum mailman, decreasing the power. This idea is good because it can reduce swing in a setup by making a role gated in some way. For instance, if town cop catches the cop enabler mafia role, then the cop gets disabled and can't catch anyone else.

In this case, the enabler actually makes the role . Before, the babysitter was effectively a visitor with a kill if the babysitter died. When the enabler dies, the role becomes an ungated vigilante. If the enabler was scum, this would make the setup extremely swingy as now if the enabler dies, the mafia are not only down a player but also unleashed a vigilante onto the game.

You also think I plopped a vote on my Partner all of D1 for the fun of it?

In post 2814, Andresvmb wrote:You also think I plopped a vote on my Partner all of D1 for the fun of it?

What vote?

In post 2816, VFP wrote:

In post 2814, Andresvmb wrote:You also think I plopped a vote on my Partner all of D1 for the fun of it?

What vote?

I was on Osuka from 328 all through the end of D1.

The good thing is this game is being won completely in spite of me. So by all means carry on.

In post 2817, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2816, VFP wrote:

In post 2814, Andresvmb wrote:You also think I plopped a vote on my Partner all of D1 for the fun of it?

What vote?

I was on Osuka from 328 all through the end of D1.

And how many votes did Osuka have all that time?

In post 2815, Andresvmb wrote:VOTE: Kyouko

Why this?

In post 2819, VFP wrote:

In post 2817, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2816, VFP wrote:

In post 2814, Andresvmb wrote:You also think I plopped a vote on my Partner all of D1 for the fun of it?

What vote?

I was on Osuka from 328 all through the end of D1.

And how many votes did Osuka have all that time?

None. STD had just moved their RVS vote away from Osuka onto petapan. Rathe followed me right after.

In post 2820, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 2815, Andresvmb wrote:VOTE: Kyouko

Why this?

It’s a bit of a random vote amongst my POE, but I don’t remember them having much fire or caring about what was happening and well, in another game we played together, they felt different as Town.

In post 366, Gypyx wrote:

votecount 1.4

ssbm-Kyouko (4) :

Anya - DrippingGoofball - T3 - nomnomnom

Petapan (3) :

Nero Cain - Titus - Save The Dragons

Dwlee99 (2) :

Derek12 - Petapan

Osuka (2) :

Andresvmb - Rathe

Rathe (1) :

Dwlee99

Nero Cain (1) :

VFP

VFP (1) :

osuka

DrippingGoofball (1) :

ssbm_Kyouko

Not voting (2) :

Dragon of the West - Dunnstral

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-06-12 01:56:28)

, with 17 alive, it takes 9 to turn someone into a corpse

announcements

Reminder that it's encouraged to avoid using the term Lynch

flavor

video number 1095
summary - making fun of movie cliches
would recommend ? - yeah

Here’s the relevant VC btw.

Also Nero Cain was right about nomnomnom (Vaxkiller’s predecessor). He pursued there super aggressively, and DW kept deflecting. Possibly something to look into as well.