Mafiascum.net

In post 2744, Titus wrote:

Mod: Would a mafia joat with a doctor come back as having a gun?

In post 2800, tris wrote:

In post 2744, Titus wrote:

Mod: Would a mafia joat with a doctor come back as having a gun?

if one of the other shots is a role that has a gun, then yes. but, if not, then no.

strongman isn't gun flavored - it's muscle flavored


so i guess it is gun flavored but not the type gunsmith looks for lol

also thats definitely a question better suited for implosion's DMs

In post 2801, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2800, tris wrote:

In post 2744, Titus wrote:

Mod: Would a mafia joat with a doctor come back as having a gun?

if one of the other shots is a role that has a gun, then yes. but, if not, then no.

@mod: Would strongman have a gun?

Well if mod has been openly answering questions openly before she should answer them openly no matter the question.

Asking implosion midgame would be talking to another person midgame about possible setup would seem out of bounds for me.

If Tris asks implosion that’s cool but I don’t think I can

So I guess one shot strongman on the doc could work, they’d also need an investigative too to find the PRs…

Awful overloaded.

Maybe though?

Anything directly in the setup I’d expect the mod to have answers ready for before the game starts
When it comes to speculated roles that aren’t in the game that can get a bit shaky

And a roleblock too

I can’t think of what Joat works

Cop + doc is balanced with Roleblocker

Here assuming all are town we have two unlimited cops and JK.

What Joat balances that?

I am at a loss how this works

My role is limited though?

In post 2806, MathBlade wrote:So I guess one shot strongman on the doc could work, they’d also need an investigative too to find the PRs…

Awful overloaded.

Maybe though?

1 shot strongman that they burned early? lol

I know I shouldn’t hunt by setup but it’s like my main bread and butter

In post 2809, Gamma Emerald wrote:My role is limited though?

Odd night isn’t much of a limit though

(Yes I am guessing here but it’s what has already been theorized)

One of the things I look to is path to victory for scum.

If scum never get checked then they lose to PoE
If they get checked they lose because checked.

Bad setup and GG we win?

It’s entirely unsatisfying but that’s the only thing I can think of and this is a busted setup.

@titus

I am going to guess you blocked Not Mafia just to have a different guess from Luke

In post 2814, MathBlade wrote:One of the things I look to is path to victory for scum.

If scum never get checked then they lose to PoE
If they get checked they lose because checked.

Bad setup and GG we win?

a win is a win!

In post 2817, Aristeia wrote:

In post 2814, MathBlade wrote:One of the things I look to is path to victory for scum.

If scum never get checked then they lose to PoE
If they get checked they lose because checked.

Bad setup and GG we win?

a win is a win!

It’s not though.

I like to win on merits.

Winning like this feels …wrong.

we play in the world we are in, not in the world that we wish to be in.

So I guessed math, math guessed ari, and ari guessed me. Thats a fun loop

I am. But I just don’t think Mastina makes back to back unwinnable setups for scum.

(I am referring to Garfield if anyone cares)

Wait. I miss read. I saw my name in the post. I am wrong. ignore me lol