Mafiascum.net

In post 2713, Dorsey wrote:You do fake outrage in every game. It's not compelling.

YOU'VE NEVER PLAYED WITH DATISI

Dorsey's points are hilariously awful

In post 2733, Dorsey wrote:Because you're expecting a four-man quickhammer?

I mean yeah, that's happened before
I believe in TENET there was either a 9 player or 5 player quickhammer

In post 2761, Enchant wrote:Either it's ultrapocket to get my vote on datisi or Dorsey is townie.

Can i hold my vote for a bit? Thanks.

do you not recognize just how shit Dorsey's arguments are

like I think Dorsey comes off as slightly towny from this exchange, as does Datisi, but wow, Dorsey's arguments are bad

In post 2760, Dorsey wrote:How did you know Andre and Dwlee were power roles?

you say this like you know scum killed Andre and Dwlee because they were pr's

What are you arguing T3. Are you scum?

In post 2690, Datisi wrote:salsa, what the fuck was that turnaround from townreading me to voting me to voting wiki, you're explaining that today

In post 2710, Dorsey wrote:Do I have to type out your hypocrisy or is it obvious?

You missed the "LIKE THAT" part

In post 2729, Dorsey wrote:It still doesn't explain why you wouldn't just vote your leading suspect.

ANOTHER Scum claim + TMI Datisi is TOWN. (Vote someone else who might be Town and me and my partners will take care of the rest)

Like Dorsey shows NO FEAR AT ALL about Scum ganging up to hammer anyone, including herself. If they were Town they'd have a "little" of that at the very least, especially since they didn't voice suspicion about me previously. But they appear they can't get speedhammered

In post 2740, Dorsey wrote:I refuse to be the reason why this town lost

And thus I decided to vote off the bat without deliberating or seeing where everyone else's mind is at. I believe you. Totally.

In post 2742, Dorsey wrote:What, are you going to cyber bully them or something?

Tantalizing too? (Not sure it's the correct precise term) but this is close to how Guillo tried to skin the bear before they caught it in that UPick

In post 2752, Dorsey wrote:A50 COULD be scum, but you're not going to vote him because in 3 business days his partners are just going to pile on whoever anyway. It's just really not believable.

THANK YOU for confirming me too.

Here's a sincere piece of advice: STOP TALKING. You're clearing Townies in ELo. If you end up flipped the TOWN will know exactly whom NOT to vote

In post 2793, Dorsey wrote:I can't believe you killed my boy Andres

90% of the time someone says that THEY did the kill themselves.

Weekend vla

What the fuck is wrong with you?

Am I right in thinking there are 3 different wagons started now?

Kinda.

In most good situation, it's both SvsT.

Idk if A50 is joking or not.

And I've definitely voiced suspicion

I guess the pile-on is in spirit until you can get everyone around at the same time, huh? You just need one townie. I'm really comfortable with this 1v1.

gera, serious question, can you not talk about the posting style (because while i can claim that me being annoyed is town!indicative, i know most people aren't a fan of self-meta), and can you look at the actual arguments being made? dorsey's only attempts are catching me in shitty nai gotchas and contradictions.

In post 2786, Dorsey wrote:It would make more sense if you thought I was scummier than A50 ahead of time, but you're not positing that.

In post 2787, Dorsey wrote:Because that would be my leading point. "Both are voting, but I thought A was scummier than B, so I'm voting A"

In post 2791, Dorsey wrote:It's like you didn't care to address any of that

and this comes after i've said for the god knows which time that the person voting *me* is confscum to me while the person voting *someone else* isn't (not to mention that throughout the game i very clearly said i thought dorsey was scummier than a50 but who cares about actual progressions, right)

In post 2795, Looker wrote:Also, I'll be voting before three business days whether it's game etiquette or not. The cat's pretty much out of the bag now.

cool, do you have any *actual* thoughts on the crossvote?

In post 2803, T3 wrote:like I think Dorsey comes off as slightly towny from this exchange, as does Datisi, but wow, Dorsey's arguments are bad

no shit they're bad

same question as for looker

In post 2806, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 2690, Datisi wrote:salsa, what the fuck was that turnaround from townreading me to voting me to voting wiki, you're explaining that today

I've a tendency to read 1v1 as TvT, so I wanted to

think

out of the box and voted you after seeing

Three

's flip.

When

Dwlee

said in 4 scums scenario trading for 1 scum for 1 TPR is not an impossible tactic which dismiss my

why scum let

Wiki

to play like this

thought process + I forgot about

Dwlee

needed time , so I voted him.

this still doesn't explain it. on d1, you called me town for meta reasons and for the ways i was solving and whatever. that's independent from three's alignment.

also same question as for looker and t3, why are you ignoring the 1v1?

i'm gonna straight up assume salsa and t3 aren't both town because obviously this playerlist doen't give a shit about "hey, we shouldn't throw our votes around mindlessly, it's lylo", so here's hoping i guess

Gotchas? Contradictions? You're scum because you killed two townies, drove most town-targeting wagons, used hypocritical reasoning D1 and D3 to protect A50, and conveniently avoided any scrutiny (other than checkbox scrutiny) of your own despite it. I get it, a lot of people here went off of your faulty logic and adolescent peer pressure and fake rage, but gaslighting should be a bit more stronger than that when it comes to adults. You're scum. I know it, you know it - we're just waiting for these super sleuths to either read, make a guess, or give up.

Yes, more stronger. Not to be confused with most strongest.