Page 113 of 272
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:21 pm
by Andante
VOTE: malakittens
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:22 pm
by Malakittens
Andate
I am not scum reading you.
So get your flipping vote off me and stop the ate. The ate is what is starting to get to me because the last game yoh and I played a bit of pressure and yoh wwnfed to give up and replace out and you were scum
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:23 pm
by Malakittens
You know the game where I had zero content and was a watcher…..?
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:24 pm
by Andante
uh people were referencing ongoing games/whatnot, and I wasn't dealing with that. not my fault people wanted to go there, thus I was out
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:24 pm
by Andante
I don't think I read much of that game tbh
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:25 pm
by Malakittens
The mini normal? We were definitely not referencing any ongoing games.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:27 pm
by Andante
I mean, I don't wanna discuss it. Are we flipping ircher? is that the plan? I'm kinda just done with this right now
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:35 pm
by Rogue
OH SO now we are gonna shut the conv down
i mean you are all wanting to scum read me, but the minute I want to talk about it with you you dont want to bother
ok right
i'll just go fuck myself then
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:35 pm
by Malakittens
In post 2807, Rogue wrote:OH SO now we are gonna shut the conv down
i mean you are all wanting to scum read me, but the minute I want to talk about it with you you dont want to bother
ok right
i'll just go fuck myself then
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:37 pm
by Malakittens
oh ok you are right there was an ongoing game referenced, but still it's sketchy
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:38 pm
by Roden
In post 2763, Ircher wrote: In post 2761, Malakittens wrote: In post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.
Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eye
That's not true. I just didn't comment; not everything is worth it at the time. Also, the specifics matter here. You called me out for my initial reaction. Roden is calling me out for providing the standard answer to a question that has a standard answer on this site. That's very different; the former is a good faith engagement even if I disagree. The latter is just incredibly bad faith. You both agree the claim is fake; that's fine, sure; however, the way you reach that conclusion matters, and the way Roden is reaching that conclusion is really iffy compared to yours.
In post 2761, Malakittens wrote: In post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.
Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eye
I was hoping someone would notice this first. Ircher has been ignoring most people who try to case him, only ever replying to people he thinks are easy to out-argue.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:46 pm
by Roden
In post 2763, Ircher wrote: In post 2761, Malakittens wrote: In post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.
Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eye
That's not true. I just didn't comment; not everything is worth it at the time. Also, the specifics matter here. You called me out for my initial reaction. Roden is calling me out for providing the standard answer to a question that has a standard answer on this site. That's very different; the former is a good faith engagement even if I disagree. The latter is just incredibly bad faith. You both agree the claim is fake; that's fine, sure; however, the way you reach that conclusion matters, and the way Roden is reaching that conclusion is really iffy compared to yours.
In post 2761, Malakittens wrote: In post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.
Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eye
Not sure why both of those got quoted.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:47 pm
by Malakittens
I'm just a jerk and know I definetly brought up the point of his wall list looked fabricatedish and could make sense to try to look town! to delay the lim
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:47 pm
by Malakittens
In post 2637, Malakittens wrote:Then there’s also the post of that read list. I felt it was townie, but it also could be potentially be scum!ircher trying to survive another day and it was already made & ready to go.
So :torn:
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:48 pm
by Ircher
Why would I as town engage in an argument that I'm likely to lose? That's just silly. As both alignments, I am best off choosing my battles wisely.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:51 pm
by Cephrir
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:54 pm
by Cephrir
In post 2810, Roden wrote: In post 2763, Ircher wrote: In post 2761, Malakittens wrote: In post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.
Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eye
That's not true. I just didn't comment; not everything is worth it at the time. Also, the specifics matter here. You called me out for my initial reaction. Roden is calling me out for providing the standard answer to a question that has a standard answer on this site. That's very different; the former is a good faith engagement even if I disagree. The latter is just incredibly bad faith. You both agree the claim is fake; that's fine, sure; however, the way you reach that conclusion matters, and the way Roden is reaching that conclusion is really iffy compared to yours.
In post 2761, Malakittens wrote: In post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.
Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eye
I was hoping someone would notice this first. Ircher has been ignoring most people who try to case him, only ever replying to people he thinks are easy to out-argue.
Why is roden again the only person making sense.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:54 pm
by Cephrir
In post 2814, Ircher wrote:Why would I as town engage in an argument that I'm likely to lose? That's just silly. As both alignments, I am best off choosing my battles wisely.
:/
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:54 pm
by Ircher
Also the reads list comment is like the least important part pf Roden's post. It baffles me that's the hill him and Mala want to focus on here.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:55 pm
by Ircher
Well, he certainly isn't in the post you quoted!
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:56 pm
by Ircher
Not all qualms have to be pursued. Some can be just noted mentally as a "I scum read this, but it's not important enough to derail the thread over" and moved past. The only reason I addressed Roden's post was because he made multiple bad faith and poorly constructed arguments.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:57 pm
by Roden
Anyway the real reason Ircher is scum here is because there is a 100% chance we have a Voyeur and/or a Watcher and there's no way they don't sit on Ircher N1 to catch a Roleblocker. But no one's stepping forward to vouch for Ircher besides I guess Andante, who just claimed VT.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:58 pm
by Ircher
Why are yoo assuming we have a voyeur or watcher? What are your premises that lead to that conclusion?
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:58 pm
by Ircher
If anything, the flip of a tracker decreases the chance since role variety is generally important for balancing reasons.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:01 pm
by Malakittens
because i really don't feel like engaging in a 1:1 with a person who I think is prob town, but I'm trying to stop her from trying to deathtunnel me before she dies