Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:45 am
eh...his early game was p bad
Nah not interested in elimming in the hood unless activity picks up. It’s not a threat to scum so I would rather focus on what is a threat to scum.In post 2796, VP Baltar wrote:Look, I'm not going to ding you over potentially changing your Wu read anymore. Clearly, there is a world where you are town and had a better read than me. I think some of our arguing has not been that productive, but there is a certain aspect to your insistence that I'm scum that I find weirdly townie. There is a reason I've never voted you, even if I think some of your thought processes don't make a lot of sense to me.In post 2661, Nero Cain wrote:I'd argue that thinking that a player is scum and then rethinking whether or not they are really scum isn't bad town play. I guess you could also argue that Wu was so terrible that it was "good" townplay to get rid of him and maybe?In post 2655, VP Baltar wrote:You could just be terrible town here.
The place where you and I agree is that we should lim inside the neighborhood today. I would like if you could take a look at what I"m saying about Cape and give me your thoughts. I will review skitter and we can reconvene to see if either of us change our minds.
Not really seeing that.In post 2799, VP Baltar wrote:Not scum being self conscious about their vote and trying to justify it withIn post 2674, MathBlade wrote:If anything because it has hyperlinks it was not a planned hammer so lean more townIn post 2667, Yeet wrote:Cape your hammer is not NAI because there is obvious scum motivation to do it.~reasons~?
#hoodmembersmatterIn post 2802, MathBlade wrote:If you want me to elim in the hood act like the hood matters
If I'm giving Cape the benefit of the doubt here, this is so stream of conscious and aimless when it comes to speaking to actual scum motivation from me that is perhaps possible he just spent his morning building this post rather than my original thought that his wall was a honed attack at me. Could be emotional reaction from him to being voted and he is OMGUSing me.In post 2673, Cape90 wrote:The "your better then this!" thing seems forced in at 684.
In 750 VP was talking about how Nero was having this read on GeneralWu's fluffposting calling that "whatever". Anyway, oddly enough in 1293 they vote Wu, cool, so as a sidestep, how does that progress? 1344, 1939 (woah calm down there buddy, I thought Wu was "whatever" ). 1940, 1952, you know, just a casual getting aggressive, also HEM was mega towny at this point, especially with MathBlade on board so as they say in like middle school or something, ratio. gottem. 1995 Gotta ask Ari twice I guess. 2004, 2009, and then they just 2222 they, they.. they... vote yeet?? Oh let's ignore 2214 though . Well, there was 2381. But then like, a post later, they just... kinda swap back to GeneralWu (2388) who I still don't really get why VP pushed here. Also wouldn't Wu be the logical play? You said so yourself 2128.
IDK, maybe there is just a lot of distrust in the hood and it's actually townie, but seems likely setup spec there is at least one scum in there. Those are better odds than what I'm seeing being presented as counter cases (fua scum for example). Cleaning the hood would actually make it matter. I don't think that's a bad D2 strat at all.In post 2802, MathBlade wrote:Nah not interested in elimming in the hood unless activity picks up. It’s not a threat to scum so I would rather focus on what is a threat to scum.
If you want me to elim in the hood act like the hood matters
hi are you our new fuaIn post 2807, Enchant wrote:Hi i didn't read anything
I am discovered ripSave The Dragons wrote:according to replacement request thread enchant is the new fua and not just some lost soul wandering into our game
Cool are you a doctor who healed me?In post 2807, Enchant wrote:Hi i didn't read anything
WOW WTF CLAIMED, FAILED TO KILL AND REPLACED DISGUSTINGIn post 2093, fua wrote:I can’t believe I actually need to explain why I’m town after I claim vigilante D1.
Wouldn't it be too wild for the SK to claim Vig though? Even with the lack of a direct CC the Vig flip at any point just outs the SK who should try to avoid being yeeted at all costs.In post 2587, Yeet wrote:I could maybe, maybe see fua being a serial killer?
My question is why you didn't skim pages inbetween to see if votes had shifted? Even if you aren't reading, that's pretty standard play isn't it?In post 2772, Cape90 wrote:EoD VC is 2438 which really isn't that long of a time from the other VC I pulled up,
This continues to be weak thinking. Scumhunt. Don't rely on lazy tools. If the hood is all town and we assume one must be scum we just earned ourselves 4 mislims.In post 2806, VP Baltar wrote:IDK, maybe there is just a lot of distrust in the hood and it's actually townie, but seems likely setup spec there is at least one scum in there. Those are better odds than what I'm seeing being presented as counter cases (fua scum for example). Cleaning the hood would actually make it matter. I don't think that's a bad D2 strat at all.In post 2802, MathBlade wrote:Nah not interested in elimming in the hood unless activity picks up. It’s not a threat to scum so I would rather focus on what is a threat to scum.
If you want me to elim in the hood act like the hood matters