Page 113 of 329

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:45 am
by Nero Cain
eh...his early game was p bad

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:45 am
by Mizzytastic
Eye spaces of one or two points can never make two eyes. Eye spaces with three can, but the opponent can also play at the vital point to break it.


Image Image




Official Votecount 2.2VP Baltar (3): Scorpious, Cape90, Nero Cain
[E-6]

Scorpious (2): Save The Dragons, MathBlade
Enchant (2): skitter30, Datisi
tenebrousluminary (2): DeasVail, fireisredsir
Save The Dragons (1): tenebrousluminary
MalcolmTucker (1): Yeet
skitter30 (1): Enchant
Cape90 (1): VP Baltar

Not Voting (4): Frogsterking, MalcolmTucker, Eyes without a face, April Ludgate

With 17 players alive, it takes 9 votes to achieve an elimination.

Day 2 will end in (expired on 2022-03-16 09:20:00).


Enchant
is replacing
fua
.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:46 am
by MathBlade
In post 2796, VP Baltar wrote:
In post 2661, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 2655, VP Baltar wrote:You could just be terrible town here.
I'd argue that thinking that a player is scum and then rethinking whether or not they are really scum isn't bad town play. I guess you could also argue that Wu was so terrible that it was "good" townplay to get rid of him and maybe?
Look, I'm not going to ding you over potentially changing your Wu read anymore. Clearly, there is a world where you are town and had a better read than me. I think some of our arguing has not been that productive, but there is a certain aspect to your insistence that I'm scum that I find weirdly townie. There is a reason I've never voted you, even if I think some of your thought processes don't make a lot of sense to me.

The place where you and I agree is that we should lim inside the neighborhood today. I would like if you could take a look at what I"m saying about Cape and give me your thoughts. I will review skitter and we can reconvene to see if either of us change our minds.
Nah not interested in elimming in the hood unless activity picks up. It’s not a threat to scum so I would rather focus on what is a threat to scum.

If you want me to elim in the hood act like the hood matters

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:46 am
by MathBlade
In post 2799, VP Baltar wrote:
In post 2674, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2667, Yeet wrote:Cape your hammer is not NAI because there is obvious scum motivation to do it.
If anything because it has hyperlinks it was not a planned hammer so lean more town
Not scum being self conscious about their vote and trying to justify it with
~reasons~
?
Not really seeing that.
Whatever their alignment it’s pretty clear hammer was an accident

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:49 am
by Nero Cain
In post 2802, MathBlade wrote:If you want me to elim in the hood act like the hood matters
#hoodmembersmatter

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:54 am
by VP Baltar
In post 2673, Cape90 wrote:The "your better then this!" thing seems forced in at 684.
In 750 VP was talking about how Nero was having this read on GeneralWu's fluffposting calling that "whatever". Anyway, oddly enough in 1293 they vote Wu, cool, so as a sidestep, how does that progress? 1344, 1939 (woah calm down there buddy, I thought Wu was "whatever" ). 1940, 1952, you know, just a casual getting aggressive, also HEM was mega towny at this point, especially with MathBlade on board so as they say in like middle school or something, ratio. gottem. 1995 Gotta ask Ari twice I guess. 2004, 2009, and then they just 2222 they, they.. they... vote yeet?? Oh let's ignore 2214 though . Well, there was 2381. But then like, a post later, they just... kinda swap back to GeneralWu (2388) who I still don't really get why VP pushed here. Also wouldn't Wu be the logical play? You said so yourself 2128.
If I'm giving Cape the benefit of the doubt here, this is so stream of conscious and aimless when it comes to speaking to actual scum motivation from me that is perhaps possible he just spent his morning building this post rather than my original thought that his wall was a honed attack at me. Could be emotional reaction from him to being voted and he is OMGUSing me.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:56 am
by VP Baltar
In post 2802, MathBlade wrote:Nah not interested in elimming in the hood unless activity picks up. It’s not a threat to scum so I would rather focus on what is a threat to scum.

If you want me to elim in the hood act like the hood matters
IDK, maybe there is just a lot of distrust in the hood and it's actually townie, but seems likely setup spec there is at least one scum in there. Those are better odds than what I'm seeing being presented as counter cases (fua scum for example). Cleaning the hood would actually make it matter. I don't think that's a bad D2 strat at all.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:58 am
by Enchant
Hi i didn't read anything

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:00 am
by fireisredsir
In post 2807, Enchant wrote:Hi i didn't read anything
hi are you our new fua

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:01 am
by Save The Dragons
according to replacement request thread enchant is the new fua and not just some lost soul wandering into our game

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:01 am
by Enchant
Save The Dragons wrote:according to replacement request thread enchant is the new fua and not just some lost soul wandering into our game
I am discovered rip

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:02 am
by Nero Cain
VOTE: enchant

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:02 am
by MathBlade
In post 2807, Enchant wrote:Hi i didn't read anything
Cool are you a doctor who healed me?
Or a vig who shot frog

(Everyone else please don’t correct anything here if it is wrong)

Your slot true claimed earlier

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:02 am
by Mizzytastic
Sorry, I put it into the VC I was already prepping near the top of the page.
Enchant
has indeed replaced
fua
.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:03 am
by Enchant
In post 2093, fua wrote:I can’t believe I actually need to explain why I’m town after I claim vigilante D1.
WOW WTF CLAIMED, FAILED TO KILL AND REPLACED DISGUSTING

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:03 am
by Enchant
I can shot ppl, so you better to pray because i am in mood.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:03 am
by Nero Cain
In post 2811, Nero Cain wrote:VOTE: enchant

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:04 am
by Enchant
In post 2816, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 2811, Nero Cain wrote:VOTE: enchant

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:05 am
by Nero Cain
sheep me, enchant

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:06 am
by Enchant
No, thx.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:07 am
by Enchant
(really who just reveal self at day 1 as vigilante)

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:07 am
by Eyes without a face
In post 2587, Yeet wrote:I could maybe, maybe see fua being a serial killer?
Wouldn't it be too wild for the SK to claim Vig though? Even with the lack of a direct CC the Vig flip at any point just outs the SK who should try to avoid being yeeted at all costs.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:07 am
by VP Baltar
In post 2772, Cape90 wrote:EoD VC is 2438 which really isn't that long of a time from the other VC I pulled up,
My question is why you didn't skim pages inbetween to see if votes had shifted? Even if you aren't reading, that's pretty standard play isn't it?

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:08 am
by tenebrousluminary
In post 2806, VP Baltar wrote:
In post 2802, MathBlade wrote:Nah not interested in elimming in the hood unless activity picks up. It’s not a threat to scum so I would rather focus on what is a threat to scum.

If you want me to elim in the hood act like the hood matters
IDK, maybe there is just a lot of distrust in the hood and it's actually townie, but seems likely setup spec there is at least one scum in there. Those are better odds than what I'm seeing being presented as counter cases (fua scum for example). Cleaning the hood would actually make it matter. I don't think that's a bad D2 strat at all.
This continues to be weak thinking. Scumhunt. Don't rely on lazy tools. If the hood is all town and we assume one must be scum we just earned ourselves 4 mislims.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:10 am
by Nero Cain
eh.......