Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:36 pm
I never do that.In post 2823, Tamuz wrote:nah, the reference to you insisting you're unassailably correct on subjective issues is key.
Page 114 of 173
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:37 pm
Sureeee
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 7:12 pm
I like this too. Mine is also a reference to popular macro images used in arguments on image boards, such as:
It's what I personally picture every time Psyche expresses an opposing thought.
The "objectively" one is okay but Psyche obviously doesn't like it
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:26 am
who else things psyche doesn't deserve a title just yet? I couldn't bear seeing any title in which three of the same letters occur consecutively EVERY SINGLE TIME HE POSTS
* raises hand*
* raises hand*
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:28 am
though this happens to be the better of the bunch because only two g's
still I prefer Mafia Scum
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:40 am
this is pretty much the same idea I had for Tamuz
and really when I think of 'argumentative poster' Psyche is one of the last to come to mind
and really when I think of 'argumentative poster' Psyche is one of the last to come to mind
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 11:42 am
Nominate everyone on Mafiascum for "I'm right and you're wrong." or something similar.
I propose that this, or something similar, replaces the default "Mafia Scum" title, or possibly that it be given after more posts than are required for "Mafia Scum".This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people. Giving a title to anyone for it would be like giving them a title for playing mafia, if anything it would be the people who don't argue who need a title.
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:59 pm
The comment is more on how psyche argues rather than that Psyche argues.
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:11 pm
That title works for me
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:55 am
In post 2832, Tamuz wrote:The comment is more on how psyche argues rather than that Psyche argues.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:49 am
Still not all that unique IMO.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:08 am
but aside from the multiple letter thinggg I don't see how it's specific to Psyche - I don't read it and think "yup that's definitely Psyche and only Psyche" which is what a title should doIn post 2834, Brandi wrote:In post 2832, Tamuz wrote:The comment is more on how psyche argues rather than that Psyche argues.
I'm not saying it's awful, but we've barely discussed it. This isn't a case of "holy shit just give this dude a title already so everyone will shut up about it", so there's no reason we should settle for something so bland.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:12 am
No it doesn't.In post 2831, Who wrote:This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:38 am
something else will probably come up at some point
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:45 am
Yes, it does.In post 2837, Kublai Khan wrote:No it doesn't.In post 2831, Who wrote:This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:45 am
You're both wrong!In post 2839, Nobody Special wrote:Yes, it does.In post 2837, Kublai Khan wrote:No it doesn't.In post 2831, Who wrote:This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:08 am
But...principle of noncontradiction...
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:10 am
please noIn post 2831, Who wrote:Nominate everyone on Mafiascum for "I'm right and you're wrong." or something similar.I propose that this, or something similar, replaces the default "Mafia Scum" title, or possibly that it be given after more posts than are required for "Mafia Scum".
This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people. Giving a title to anyone for it would be like giving them a title for playing mafia, if anything it would be the people who don't argue who need a title.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:12 am
Man, we really need that sarcasm font.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:22 am
I agree with you.In post 2831, Who wrote:it would be the people who don't argue who need a title.
And with everything everyone else has said in this thread. And across the site.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:51 am
In post 2843, Mr. Flay wrote:Man, we really need that sarcasm font.
This is supposedly the Sarcasm font. I would not assume sarcasm if I saw this
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:42 pm
NUH UHIn post 2843, Mr. Flay wrote:Man, we really need that sarcasm font.
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:34 pm
this font is super good and incredibly useful, I'm going to use it a lot
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:13 pm
Well I tried. Guess most people don't see it as fitting which is fair, that is the point of this thread after all!In post 2836, Umbrage wrote:but aside from the multiple letter thinggg I don't see how it's specific to Psyche - I don't read it and think "yup that's definitely Psyche and only Psyche" which is what a title should doIn post 2834, Brandi wrote:In post 2832, Tamuz wrote:The comment is more on how psyche argues rather than that Psyche argues.
I'm not saying it's awful, but we've barely discussed it. This isn't a case of "holy shit just give this dude a title already so everyone will shut up about it", so there's no reason we should settle for something so bland.
Someday, Psyche.
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:42 pm
Only thing I can think of for Psyche is "too smart for his own good"
Possibly too long
Possibly too long