Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:10 pm
auro why are you defending eddie so hard
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Are scum ever so blatantly LAMIST though?In post 2823, OkaPoka wrote:look at me im so townIn post 2822, Auro wrote:Have you never heard rhetoric that goes, "lynch me so I can get out of the game pls"?In post 2819, OkaPoka wrote:so why does eddie ask to be lynched btw ?
What's the scum motivation in saying that?
It's not just Auro. And I want Auro lynched.In post 2825, OkaPoka wrote:auro why are you defending eddie so hard
lamist is literally my favorite playIn post 2826, Alchemist21 wrote:Are scum ever so blatantly LAMIST though?In post 2823, OkaPoka wrote:look at me im so townIn post 2822, Auro wrote:Have you never heard rhetoric that goes, "lynch me so I can get out of the game pls"?In post 2819, OkaPoka wrote:so why does eddie ask to be lynched btw ?
What's the scum motivation in saying that?
You were not only assuming that I'd wait till deadline, but also that a majority of town wouldn't care, and also that I wasn't understanding what you said and would still wait till deadline.In post 2821, Alchemist21 wrote:Because there were 4 days remaining in the deadline at the time and the longer you waited the more likely it would happen. I know you didn't explicitly say you were going to wait that long but it's the possibility I saw and I wanted to nip it in the bud. If you have a case then why wait to post it at all? (And don't tell me that your "guilty" is your case.)In post 2813, Auro wrote:Alchemist, I acknowledge that waiting till the last minute to case, if everyone's voting for you because of the case, is bad. When I say waiting, why assume that I'm waiting for deadline and not any other point of the day?
Because I townread him.In post 2825, OkaPoka wrote:auro why are you defending eddie so hard
so this post was bait so you could explain your townread on eddie?In post 2801, Auro wrote:Huh. I thought it was a part of trying to form a read on me, not manipulation to try and lynch Eddie.
I think Eddie is town. Please show me not just why he's scum, but why he's the best lynch for today.
I don't get the question. My post was asking you why you think he should be lynched. Why would I need to be baited to explain why I think Eddie is town?In post 2832, OkaPoka wrote:so this post was bait so you could explain your townread on eddie?
A convincing justification.In post 2834, OkaPoka wrote:what would i hypothetically have to show for you to vote eddie?
I don't think there is any convincing justification that he should be lynched, otherwise I'd be advocating for his lynch myself, yeah?OkaPoka wrote:what would this convincing justification need to be?
Well, you could go the other route and show me why lynching someone like Alch, NSG, or even iDanyBoi, is worse than lynching Eddie.OkaPoka wrote:like hypothetically what would i have to prove on eddie
like this is not the post someone makes who is "open" to having their minds changedIn post 2817, Auro wrote:That feels like a very surface level read to form for Eddie, Oka.In post 2811, OkaPoka wrote:im saying his specific tonal change indicates scummy mentality
like you know ive always cared about this game and am survivalistic
eddie is just playing the game of "im not survivalistic lol" and then once he gets wagon'd suddenly he goes to town on how much he is town and look at me im so town? im not buying that
Having-fun Eddie still recognizes the basic duty of avoiding being a mislynch. He acknowledged that explicitly.
Also, damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, no? You were still pushing for his lynch when he wasn't playing to survival at lynch range.
What do you expect to happen? Nobody thought you were softing a guilty so what else?In post 2830, Auro wrote:>See how the attacked slot reacts (do they think I'm softing a guilty? for one, and if so, even better)
Why do you expect other slots to react when you haven't presented the case yet? If I'm scum my buddies aren't going come running to save me or bus me and if I'm Town then nobody's going to care.>See how others react to the sudden hard change in momentum (do they try to divert the lynch to someone else? Do they chainsaw or hard defend? Who sheeps me onto him?)
If you have a case and say you have one then presumably you've done enough observing and are ready to make your case a talking point.>Talking about the case could be something I find less productive before I see what happens, as the case itself becomes a major talking point presumably for a few pages
if you scumread nsg why aren;t you voting nsg ?In post 2840, Auro wrote:Also, note that I already posted that it's surprising no one had asked me why I townread Eddie.
I don't think there is any convincing justification that he should be lynched, otherwise I'd be advocating for his lynch myself, yeah?OkaPoka wrote:what would this convincing justification need to be?
If you think otherwise it's up to you to show me that it exists.
Well, you could go the other route and show me why lynching someone like Alch, NSG, or even iDanyBoi, is worse than lynching Eddie.OkaPoka wrote:like hypothetically what would i have to prove on eddie
You could talk me out of those scumreads for a start.
Thank you!