Mafiascum.net

In post 2806, marcistar wrote:

In post 2798, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2797, marcistar wrote:you also said furtives role makes sense for scum to have but look where that wound u up

It absolutely did. It was still the right play to elim furtive because of that and lying. It’s not like I was alone in saying it either. Given the same facts I’d do it again too.

and you dont pause to think

furtives role makes sense as scum yet hes town
so maybe the same thing applies to others?

geez for someone who keeps trying to take mechanical lead you sure are shit at it

In post 2809, marcistar wrote:so... why use mechanics if ur so bad at it? u should try focusing on reading ppl for what they've done I think ull have higher chances of succeeding then

I kinda doubt scum marci responds this way to math correctly saying her claim is fake based on the set up.

So if we are between marci and bcg, I would lean bcg - but also have not gotten to the pooky iso yet like toog asked. Just based on these marci posts really. Probably won't get there today either, probably tomorrow.

We have a claimed rolecop and a flipped rolecop?

Did Titus claim before or after frog claimed/died?

Am interested in more info on enchants claim too. Has he said more then what is in that post?

In post 2822, marcistar wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear - 2-Shot Follower
Spoiler: Acts
N1: Titus. Result: investigative Action
N2: Unknown

Any idea how follower Pooky would have known Titus was specifically an invest?

In post 2826, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 2822, marcistar wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear - 2-Shot Follower
Spoiler: Acts
N1: Titus. Result: investigative Action
N2: Unknown

Any idea how follower Pooky would have known Titus was specifically an invest?

Followers see the action type of who they follow.

In post 2824, Lukewarm wrote:We have a claimed rolecop and a flipped rolecop?

Did Titus claim before or after frog claimed/died?

Frog claimed in thread
Titus claimed after that but didn’t act as CC.

Worth of note she hasn’t confirmed her RC claim. Only that she can check for vanilla/not vanilla

In post 2827, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2826, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 2822, marcistar wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear - 2-Shot Follower
Spoiler: Acts
N1: Titus. Result: investigative Action
N2: Unknown

Any idea how follower Pooky would have known Titus was specifically an invest?

Followers see the action type of who they follow.

Oh, my brain read follower as tracker

In post 2828, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2824, Lukewarm wrote:We have a claimed rolecop and a flipped rolecop?

Did Titus claim before or after frog claimed/died?

Frog claimed in thread
Titus claimed after that but didn’t act as CC.

Worth of note she hasn’t confirmed her RC claim. Only that she can check for vanilla/not vanilla

If she is actually claiming role cop, then forcing her to target bcg/marci should tell us a lot right?

If marci is actually a doc, it seems like if she was scum she would have always protected pooky if NM announced he was gonna target him, right?

If she is actually claiming like vanilla cop, then obviously not as helpful

In post 2830, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 2828, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2824, Lukewarm wrote:We have a claimed rolecop and a flipped rolecop?

Did Titus claim before or after frog claimed/died?

Frog claimed in thread
Titus claimed after that but didn’t act as CC.

Worth of note she hasn’t confirmed her RC claim. Only that she can check for vanilla/not vanilla

If she is actually claiming role cop, then forcing her to target bcg/marci should tell us a lot right?

If marci is actually a doc, it seems like if she was scum she would have always protected pooky if NM announced he was gonna target him, right?

If she is actually claiming like vanilla cop, then obviously not as helpful

She’s claiming rolecop.

Marci had full claimed. Checking someone who is not full claimed then she hand shakes part and the other person confirms is the only way to confirm.

Otherwise Titus just goes “yep matches the claim” and we don’t know

In post 2831, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2830, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 2828, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2824, Lukewarm wrote:We have a claimed rolecop and a flipped rolecop?

Did Titus claim before or after frog claimed/died?

Frog claimed in thread
Titus claimed after that but didn’t act as CC.

Worth of note she hasn’t confirmed her RC claim. Only that she can check for vanilla/not vanilla

If she is actually claiming role cop, then forcing her to target bcg/marci should tell us a lot right?

If marci is actually a doc, it seems like if she was scum she would have always protected pooky if NM announced he was gonna target him, right?

If she is actually claiming like vanilla cop, then obviously not as helpful

She’s claiming rolecop.

Marci had full claimed. Checking someone who is not full claimed then she hand shakes part and the other person confirms is the only way to confirm.

Otherwise Titus just goes “yep matches the claim” and we don’t know

I think that you are thinking about it to test Titus, but I was thinking about it to test Marci.

How does that test Marci?

I believe she’s that role regardless of her alignment?

And if she was on Pooky as I explained to Titus

I would have gotten
1 killing action
1 protective
1 investigative

So then Pooky is just the elim that day
Saving Pooky doesn’t help scum there.

We get the same result.

In post 2756, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 2746, schadd_ wrote:

Save The Dragons (2):

MathBlade, MalcolmTucker

Rude

Not exactly, your slot has been scrutinized

In post 2759, MariaR wrote:

In post 2755, Lukewarm wrote:I have arrived

Hey Marci, want to break down the game for me?

People think the game is solved wooo (B

yes

solved in a closed game

very solved

In post 2761, Lukewarm wrote:Sorry, my roommate was in a car accident this morning. Might be a bit before I actually get caught up.

I'm a VT

so like

Luke is outed for this right?

In post 1992, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:afteer my.last game.i guess i don't have that same drive after falling flat for getting pushed.
kinda out of this game so imma claim im.loyal bg, if theres a vig this can combo nicely.
I can create a clear potentially and yeah.

I'd like to get STD and i can BG pooky tonight

VOTE: Lukewarm

In post 2761, Lukewarm wrote:Sorry, my roommate was in a car accident this morning. Might be a bit before I actually get caught up.

I'm a VT

UNVOTE: Lukewarm

no wait never mind

In post 2837, Cape90 wrote:

In post 2761, Lukewarm wrote:Sorry, my roommate was in a car accident this morning. Might be a bit before I actually get caught up.

I'm a VT

so like

Luke is outed for this right?

?? Why do you say this??

I hope his roommate gets better and Luke being scum is a possibility but I don’t see the dots here

In post 2769, Lukewarm wrote:So we have two claimed protectives in a game with a vig, so you (math) think one of them is scum?

I would think so tbh

2 protectives in a game seems a bit unbalanced to me

In post 2840, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2837, Cape90 wrote:

In post 2761, Lukewarm wrote:Sorry, my roommate was in a car accident this morning. Might be a bit before I actually get caught up.

I'm a VT

so like

Luke is outed for this right?

?? Why do you say this??

I hope his roommate gets better and Luke being scum is a possibility but I don’t see the dots here

I thought they were Big Chungus Gaming

In post 2777, Lukewarm wrote:Wait, if he is loyal does he visit and his action fail? Or does he never visit?

action fails i beleive

if he loyal visits mafia

In post 2783, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2782, Lukewarm wrote:I am a VT, so I don't have e shots.

I replaced std not chungus

Math.exe has borked

Math.exe restarted

My bad. Got the claim though. Since you read first could be forced.

Meh. I am okay with a BGC elim I think. Shines a lot into things I think.

did you seriously make the same mistake

Lukewarm seems towny to me, at least lightly so.

Wow it's like I was correct on Save The Dragons

In post 2825, Lukewarm wrote:Am interested in more info on enchants claim too. Has he said more then what is in that post?

Yes.

My role is also doubled.