Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:55 pm
"Too Smart" would work.
Page 115 of 173
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:58 pm
but im an idiot
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:59 pm
That's the beauty of it.
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 4:31 pm
I'm feelin smart
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:35 am
2smart4u
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:44 am
2smart4uuu
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:35 am
That title doesn't really fit Psyche for me.
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:42 pm
Nope nope and nope.
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 4:40 am
Just browsing this threadIn post 2751, xRECKONERx wrote:Except DemonHybrid is Matias, and we're not giving someone the same title as a legend like Phoebus?In post 2750, RichardGHP wrote:Well, the user it belongs to has not posted on the site in over two years. I don't think they would mind.
Furthermore, are we seriously discussingrewarding breaking site ruleswith a title? We shouldn't be handing out titles, the admins should be handing out a ban.
If you want to strip DH of that title, go for it.
That being said, I don't support titles that encourage breaking rules
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:29 pm
Actually, while I have everyone, TBM, would you mind getting rid of my old account's title?
I don't mind if this one gets one or not, there's just no use for that title to be on my old account if someone wants to use it.
I don't mind if this one gets one or not, there's just no use for that title to be on my old account if someone wants to use it.
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:55 am
Nominate sirdanilot for
Not sure if good nom, but lets get this cash-cow of titles flowing again
Seriously
Not sure if good nom, but lets get this cash-cow of titles flowing again
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 2:24 am
bad nom
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 2:59 am
Then counter propose or develop.
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 4:05 am
I will when I think of something good; noms for the sake of noms is dumb
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:15 pm
If you're only saying this so someone else can use your title, then you might as well keep it. No one wants to usurp it now that the ArcAngel suggestion was killed.In post 2859, Matias wrote:Actually, while I have everyone, TBM, would you mind getting rid of my old account's title?
I don't mind if this one gets one or not, there's just no use for that title to be on my old account if someone wants to use it.
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:27 am
Use a reference to Poe's law, it combines both the 'is he serious?' part of his posting and the religiousness part.In post 2862, AngryPidgeon wrote:Then counter propose or develop.
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:29 am
Is a reference to posting that directly led to long-term ban
still gonna say no
still gonna say no
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:22 am
Its not though?
His whole spheal about "posts are as serious as you want them to be" was just him being a troll and peripheral to whatever got him banned.
His whole spheal about "posts are as serious as you want them to be" was just him being a troll and peripheral to whatever got him banned.
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 10:03 am
Nominate AngryPidgeon for the title of "Bulletproof".
Seriously, he's not only drawn that role an unusually-large number of times, but also fakeclaimed it often enough that it's basically become a running joke about him.
(Though, "Immune to Bullets" might work better.)
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 10:32 am
I like immune to bullets personally but he's better known to me for fake claiming and changing claims
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 10:34 am
Claimproof
?Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:35 am
Bulletproof Thingamajig
Adds into the fact his claims are dubious at best.
Also very fun to say.
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:55 am
Dodges Bullets
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:58 am
2nd Bulletproof Thingamajig
because that sounds amazing as a titlePosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 12:01 pm
In post 2873, DeathRowKitty wrote:2nd Bulletproof Thingamajigbecause that sounds amazing as a title