Mafiascum.net

It's real simple, he either believes the fucking claim or he doesn't

how the hell does he take a mutually confirmed mason and say "WELL I THINK THIS GUY -MIGHT- BE TOWN BUT I HAVE NO READ ON THE OTHER GUY"


no

it's a simple YES OR FUCKING NO

either you believe the claim or you do not

and you damn well need to have the same read on both masons, or at least reasonably close--- otherwise you're pretty blatantly pulling stuff out of your ass

In post 2848, Zdenek wrote:Why are you defending Stevie?

I'm specifically fighting a broken record of a point that doesn't mean anything, but go ahead and think that if you want to.

In post 2849, Serene wrote:the point is, he has no read on one mason but leans town on the other

This type of logic only works if both are listed but in different categories. Not listing one at all while mentioning the other means jack shit.

In post 2853, Ankamius wrote:This type of logic only works if both are listed but in different categories. Not listing one at all while mentioning the other means jack shit.

Explain to me how not claiming a read on a living player means jack shit.

Metal Sonic has worn a ban so gets forced replaced.

Ank, how about voting one of the top 3 wagons?
Rift, you too.

In post 2855, Baby Spice wrote:Metal Sonic has worn a ban so gets forced replaced.

ah i gotcha

VOTE: zd

Top 3 wagons lololol

In post 2852, Serene wrote:

@Mod Why is metal sonic being replaced?

In post 2858, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: zd

Top 3 wagons lololol

voting me lololol

Orc, what are you trying to accomplish?

Vote scum

Aside from the awfully convenient fact that the top 3 wagons don't include you why are you limiting his options to the top 3

It stinks

Incidentally I'm phoneposting but fery I promise you something good by the time you wake up (y)

Bulba and Stevie are both strong scum reads of mine, and I don't think that 3rdKoopa is a horrible vote either, so I'm trying to get people to cooperate on a lynch. If you think that is scummy, I don't know what to say.

K

UNVOTE:

In post 2854, Serene wrote:

In post 2853, Ankamius wrote:This type of logic only works if both are listed but in different categories. Not listing one at all while mentioning the other means jack shit.

Explain to me how not claiming a read on a living player means jack shit.

I'm glad you decided to omit the fact that the person you're talking about is the second half of a mason pair, since generalizing that just makes this a misrep.

Of fucking course only mentioning one person in a mason pair means jack shit. Their alignments are linked together, so mentioning both or just one means exactly the same thing.

In post 2865, Ankamius wrote:

In post 2854, Serene wrote:

In post 2853, Ankamius wrote:This type of logic only works if both are listed but in different categories. Not listing one at all while mentioning the other means jack shit.

Explain to me how not claiming a read on a living player means jack shit.

I'm glad you decided to omit the fact that the person you're talking about is the second half of a mason pair, since generalizing that just makes this a misrep.

Of fucking course only mentioning one person in a mason pair means jack shit. Their alignments are linked together, so mentioning both or just one means exactly the same thing.

Not really, but by all means toss overly-used words like "misrep"

You literally asked me to explain something that was irrelevant to what I said before.

That's at best deflecting.

how is it a fucking misrepresentation when EVERYONE IN THE GAME KNOWS HE'S THE OTHER HALF OF A MASON PAIR

you're absolutely right, i thought by omitting that from my point that EVERYONE WOULD FORGET THAT VERY FACT


seriously man, just bus your buddies, this is infuriating

"deflecting"

"misrep"



STOP SPEAKING IN FUCKING BUZZWORDS YOU GOT FROM THE WIKI

Why are you even speaking for a guy that dropped off the fucking map as soon as the heat was off him?

riddle me THAT batman

THE MEANING COMPLETELY CHANGED BY OMITTING IT

YOU LITERALLY ASKED ME SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT

HOLY FUCK

I'm arguing against a shit point.

I WANTED TO FUCKING KNOW WHY THE HELL HE OMITTED THE READ ON A PLAYER


ANY PLAYER AT ALL


ESPECIALLY A MASONIC PARTNER

WHEN HE CLAIMS TO LEAN TOWN ON ONE


WHY THE FUCK DIDN'T HE JUST SAY "THE MASONS" INSTEAD OF MENTIONING MY SLOT