Mafiascum.net

In post 1462, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1435, Tammy wrote:There haven’t been that many times I’ve seen town make a catch-up post like that. The format itself whether it’s by player or page automatically pings me. It’s made worse when there are so many unnecessary comments or comments that don’t add anything, which makes it look like padding.

yeah it reeks of catchups I used to make as scum. it's not really helpful but it looks good on the surface.

In post 2876, Bell wrote:Is that a lot tho. You already got pushed on this and I don’t wanna retread old ground. But you’re mischaracterizing your initial reaction and your subsequent apporach, imo.

In post 2860, Nahdia wrote:

In post 2849, DiamondSentinel wrote: I don't have solid answers on anything. I just have gutreads that I go based off of and then try to scrap together weak justification to convince others that it isn't just a gutread.

but you specifically called me out as someone you can read well!!!!! why!? explain yourself!

In post 2872, fferyllt wrote:

In post 899, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 890, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

In post 884, DiamondSentinel wrote:PEdit: Absolutely. Just because you disagree with someone's reads does not mean that they are not legit. Legitimate reads are reads that are working towards solving the game, not sowing discord. There are many people I've had disagreeing reads with historically that I also did not for a second doubt were town, and they truly meant those reads (and there are a fair few people who's said the same thing)

Wait, you're getting me confused. What's the differences between

Merit

,

Normalize

, and

Legit

?

Functionally? Very little.
To normalize a set of reads (or a stance) would just be to grant that it is legitimate and has merit.
Merit is that it's not complete bullshit and is worth discussing.
Legitimacy is that it is meant to solve the game and not sow dissent.

In post 2849, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 2845, Nahdia wrote:was really hoping DS would give a better answer on my question about his meta on me. as it stands it was basically a dodge.

In post 2826, The Bulge wrote:Nahdia isn't here rn, be my scheherazade~

hello hello.
bulge's content this game:

Spoiler:

• votes DS for his anger at RVS being a bit performative. i did take note of that as well!
  
• i kinda liked 1122 for some reason. it's bold.
  
• starts asking lots of mech questions to clarify the dethy traitor thing. personally i find mechspeccing to be where a scum thrives, but i cant deny the town perspective here. he's asking questions that scum would obviously already know the answer to.
  
• his early d2 is pretty defensive, though not necessarily in a bad way? it feels strange to me that bulge would be surprised to be in PoEs in a way that i almost wanna say is towny.
  
• gets much more into sorting territory by 2679. i like this post and the posts that follow. the continual followup on questions he's asked makes the sorting look genuine.
  
• i feel 2806 deep in my soul

bulge feels towny to me.

I don't have solid answers on anything. I just have gutreads that I go based off of and then try to scrap together weak justification to convince others that it isn't just a gutread.

It feels like there's a disconnect between these two posts. The first one suggests a structure and method. The second one suggests the opposite. When I read the first one, I made a mental note that I wanted to see if your iso suggests a fair amount of method in your playstyle.

In post 2769, Alisae wrote:I'd def be down to kill Gamma.
not sure about bulge tho, I kinda like his recent content

In post 2818, Bell wrote:

In post 2815, Alisae wrote:Bell who is scummy

Good Q.

I’m struggling with narratives and counter narratives for each player RN tbh. I feel like I could make a reasonable case for any of the remaining unclaimed players to be scum at this point, but I’m not sure how accurate I would be. There are more players saying odd things than there are players that could be scum in this game. Do you want me to write them out for you tomorrow?

In post 2881, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

In post 2868, fferyllt wrote:Can you wrap words around these two reads?

In post 2884, fferyllt wrote:

In post 2881, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

In post 2887, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 2884, fferyllt wrote:

In post 2881, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

My point in the first one.

In post 2886, fferyllt wrote:Cabd, petapan: thoughts about trying gth?

In post 2888, fferyllt wrote:

In post 2887, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 2884, fferyllt wrote:

In post 2881, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

My point in the first one.

Wordz it please.

In post 2890, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 2888, fferyllt wrote:

In post 2887, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 2884, fferyllt wrote:

In post 2881, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

My point in the first one.

Wordz it please.

There's a difference between an actual read and what people accept as genuine.

In post 2850, SirCakez wrote:-Gamma keeps referencing some "signalling" Taylor did with me as reason to vote me and is not actually pointing to anything specific

In post 2880, DiamondSentinel wrote:If you think I have methodology, then my acting has been a resounding success.

In post 2847, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 2786, Alisae wrote:

@Diamond

- Give me a read on bulge with some explanation as to why you have that read thanks

I don't have a read on them. I barely even remember them in this game.

In post 2882, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2769, Alisae wrote:I'd def be down to kill Gamma.
not sure about bulge tho, I kinda like his recent content

You still need to answer the thing I asked you