Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 4:34 am
Yep I've been so consensus I pushed deep wolf theory all Day one, BZZZT try again
nahIn post 2872, VP Baltar wrote:You going to reply to this andante?In post 2864, VP Baltar wrote:Uh...this is not what I said at all.In post 2862, Andante wrote:yeah umm VP having 2 bombs worries me tbh, and going "frog had value!!! must read into it!!" is not something I really want to deal with... frog just trolled around in the PT why are you implying all 3 of me greeting andres lied about what went on??
I also find your reads incredibly stagnant. You were on me D1, then you found a reason to get off me with frogster, now you're back on me. I think your strange vote lacks inspiration (and conviction since you voted with her like two seconds later).
I really don't know who you actually think is scum and why you think that.
So they have one nightkill on start.In post 2, Datisi wrote:GB Inc. infiltrators do not have a factional nightkill every night. they start off with one nightkill. for every two successful bomb defusals performed by a DATS Inc. employee, they gain one nightkill. for every successful bomb defusal performed by a GB Inc. infiltrator, they gain one nightkill.
I would like you to cite actual posts please.In post 2873, StrangeMatter wrote:About the Dwlee TMI, it was mostly a gut feeling from reading their posts that feels very TMI-like but I can't really point to exactly why knowing the flips. Though I guess its also feeling of something similar to Dwlee!scum just constantly going with the consensus slots (Similar to where he sits there and allows people to just consensus onto wrong slots).
They're boring and unchanging based upon new information. If you would like me to cite a dictionary for you, I will.In post 2876, Andante wrote:how are my reads stagnant?
Before frogster flipped I would have thought this push on me was very scummy but if frogster can make arguments based on nothing and be town then I guess strange can tooIn post 2879, VP Baltar wrote:I would like you to cite actual posts please.In post 2873, StrangeMatter wrote:About the Dwlee TMI, it was mostly a gut feeling from reading their posts that feels very TMI-like but I can't really point to exactly why knowing the flips. Though I guess its also feeling of something similar to Dwlee!scum just constantly going with the consensus slots (Similar to where he sits there and allows people to just consensus onto wrong slots).
In post 2883, Dwlee99 wrote:They can only use one night kill a night
This changes things.
Sounds like a challenge mafia.In post 2888, Enchant wrote:Mafia will not make him defuser again regardless of alignment.
Not great at citing posts (or in general) but okay.In post 2879, VP Baltar wrote:I would like you to cite actual posts please.In post 2873, StrangeMatter wrote:About the Dwlee TMI, it was mostly a gut feeling from reading their posts that feels very TMI-like but I can't really point to exactly why knowing the flips. Though I guess its also feeling of something similar to Dwlee!scum just constantly going with the consensus slots (Similar to where he sits there and allows people to just consensus onto wrong slots).
Where's the TMI unless I'm bussing mala here?In post 2892, StrangeMatter wrote:Not great at citing posts (or in general) but okay.In post 2879, VP Baltar wrote:I would like you to cite actual posts please.In post 2873, StrangeMatter wrote:About the Dwlee TMI, it was mostly a gut feeling from reading their posts that feels very TMI-like but I can't really point to exactly why knowing the flips. Though I guess its also feeling of something similar to Dwlee!scum just constantly going with the consensus slots (Similar to where he sits there and allows people to just consensus onto wrong slots).
#1006
#1404
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p13316311
#2810
This part pinged my gut as a little TMI-like with the read on someone I don't feel like has been neither scummy nor really townie, even checking the slot before them doesn't really give me a lot to work with.
Kill him with what then?In post 2894, Cephrir wrote:Don't kill him with votes.
If he gets another bomb defusal opportunityIn post 2897, Enchant wrote:Kill him with what then?In post 2894, Cephrir wrote:Don't kill him with votes.
This is my thought. We go from no one buying the scum wifom, to suddenly VP must die now because wifom!In post 2895, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Oh good, i was starting to worry there wasn't enough resistance to a mala wagon