Mafiascum.net

I don't think you're on any wagon at all, at the moment.

Why are you bugging me? Do you think I'm scum?

I agree with the logic in the tell, but it seemed so conspicuous to me that I thought it could easily be an indicator of a scum PR that had something to say.

basically limits claim to non-vanilla

In post 2901, No Brains Here wrote:Why are you bugging me? Do you think I'm scum?

I think you're anti-town.
I mean, why are you even sludging into that debate with him. She's right, you have no vote in play. You know you have no vote in play. It is well understood why some players would be annoyed that someone had no vote in play.

So don't act like it's weird, or unusual, or confusing, or that she's scum reading you because of annoyance of lack of vote in play nor of a desire to bring up what you're doing and why it is generically bad regardless of your alignment.
You play anti-town, at least be meta aware of it if you insist on doing it.

In post 2903, Thor665 wrote:You know you have no vote in play.

I said I'd hammer.

Yes, and?

In post 2905, Thor665 wrote:Yes, and?

I can't very well have a vote on and hammer unless it's L-1.

Why do you need to be the hammer?

I'll be fast and merciless. Unlike sangres.

By that logic I should unvote and demand to be hammer.

No, how about you toss in your support now and we find out who has the grapefruits?

We havn't claimed, and they have. So? what difference does that make?

The only read we have a current disagreement on is Titus, and outside of early D1 where we wern't taking anything serious, how has anything we have done not had any clear goal?

outside of the few joking posts we made, we interact when it's needed and you even stated that some of my post did have a clear goal IE. interacting with pitoli and "Making a test" for her

nearly half of our post address someone

how is talking about Theme going to help anyone? all it is, is flavor gaming. there is no scum-hunting involved in that... which is something you have also accused us of doing which is uh... Town.

also, how is paranoia scummy?

further more, you missed my point. I was saying that faking that kind of paranoia is something up more my avenue and it is something Scum-nero isn't to adept at. Yeah, I could be coaching him, but even then it won't look as genuine as it should and it'll look fake

unless that is what you're saying about the paranoia?

yes, we have the same role, but we react to different things differently. We have different strengths as individual player which is what you are ignoring

and again, I am an emotional player, Nero can be too so how is it scummy? We aren't preying on other peoples emotions, nor are we manipulating them. we are just being reactive?

~Sugar

^^^
I would love it if a Vig could shoot that.

Shush, you need to learn how to not interrupt when I'm talking to your buddies

~Sugar

^^^
I will also accept Zombie herds eating it.

In post 2913, Thor665 wrote:^^^
I will also accept Zombie herds eating it.

Don't look at me, I read Sugar Cain as town.

In post 2902, ActionDan wrote:I agree with the logic in the tell, but it seemed so conspicuous to me that I thought it could easily be an indicator of a scum PR that had something to say.

basically limits claim to non-vanilla

Wtf are you even talking about?

A) that tell is silly

B) metal sonic already claimed vt

In post 2915, Amrun wrote:B) metal sonic already claimed vt

shrug.

Wtf

I'm not sure what to say to you.

that vt claim is just. not important.

Yes, it is. State your read on metal sonic and why.

Metal Sonic lied?

/endcase

pitoli was apart from Stupendous Key, the other newbie that looked like scum due to brevity of posts + never actually taking a hard stance (plenty of soft stances) on anyone.

and the vt claim is meaningless when PRs/scum could post the same thing. let me quote it again

In post 2491, Metal Sonic wrote:im VT loool

.... "loool" immediately and intentionally gives reason to doubt the veracity of the claim

Let's lynch them all and let Mod sort them out.

It's not that he couldn't have lied, it's that you didn't even include his claim in your analysis and it didn't come off genuine at all.

So now that everyone has had their chance to post over the last 48ish hours we've been hanging on over the Elli lynch, can we please hammer now?