Page 117 of 142

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:13 am
by numberQ
That's hammer I think

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:14 am
by Enchant
Finally.

Now let's just wait another 2 days before mafia decides "Nah" and skip NK to troll.

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:21 am
by numberQ
I will cry if that happens. This game has fucked with my head enough.

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:01 am
by Looker
Still haven't read anything, but looks like I may be down to only this now.

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:14 am
by Dwlee99
Idk if no lim is hammered

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:58 am
by Kerset
Vote Count 4.02With 8 votes in play, it takes 5 to eliminate.

No elimination
(5): Dwlee99, Enchant, MegAzumarill, Harley Quinn, numberQ,
Looker (0):
Voyc (0):
Enchant (0):
Firebringer (0):
numberQ (0):
Dwlee99 (0):
Harley Quinn (0):
MegAzumarill (0):

Not Voting
(3): Voyc, Looker, Firebringer,
Deadline:
(expired on 2022-01-21 00:29:25)


Harley Quinn is on V/LA

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 11:00 am
by Kerset
No one was eliminated.
It is now night 4. It will last (expired on 2022-01-17 18:00:02)

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:36 am
by Kerset
Enchant have been killed
Spoiler: Their role was
Vanilla Townie
[/spoiler]

It is now day 5. Its deadline is postponed for now.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:37 am
by Kerset
Vote Count 5.00With 7 votes in play, it takes 4 to eliminate.

Looker (0):
Voyc (0):
Firebringer (0):
numberQ (0):
Dwlee99 (0):
Harley Quinn (0):
MegAzumarill (0):

Not Voting
(7): Voyc, Looker, Firebringer, Dwlee99, MegAzumarill, Harley Quinn, numberQ,
Deadline:
Postponed


Harley Quinn is on V/LA

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:45 am
by Voyc
looker, have you been able to read anything? it may be helpful to have a fresh perspective

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:46 am
by numberQ
I don't even remember what my reads were like earlier in the game. Should probably look back at that.

@mod it takes 4 to eliminate, not 5 right?


yea

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:54 am
by MegAzumarill
In post 2909, Voyc wrote:looker, have you been able to read anything? it may be helpful to have a fresh perspective
It may be helpful to have your perspective

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:03 am
by MegAzumarill
Weird kill tbh

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:12 am
by Dwlee99
Enchant was obvtown, not a weird kill

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:11 pm
by Harley Quinn
In post 2910, numberQ wrote:I don't even remember what my reads were like earlier in the game. Should probably look back at that.

@mod it takes 4 to eliminate, not 5 right?
I would assume so.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:12 pm
by Harley Quinn
In post 2911, MegAzumarill wrote:
In post 2909, Voyc wrote:looker, have you been able to read anything? it may be helpful to have a fresh perspective
It may be helpful to have your perspective
+1

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:27 pm
by Harley Quinn
I want to hear both, Voyc’s and Looker’s takes on the game and whomever replaces Fire as well ideally. It’s pretty unusual to have no scum flips by d5 and be in elo, so who’s fooling me. NKA is also not helpful in this case and the record breaking number of replacements aren’t helping either.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:33 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 2913, Dwlee99 wrote:Enchant was obvtown, not a weird kill
What concerns me is that I had posted a 4 person poe ayesterday nd Enchant was in it.

If I'm right on the last three then that would be a risky move, which makes me suspect there's lhf in there somewhere.

might be overthinking though, IIRC they weren't townread much by other people

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:43 pm
by Dwlee99
I'm more surprised they didn't aim for the IC

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:11 pm
by numberQ
The IC that fake claimed and got force replaced for it?

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:12 pm
by Dwlee99
No one of the people that was plausibly IC vía reaction to firebringer

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:49 pm
by numberQ
Oh I see what you were saying. Is there any reason scum wouldn't be gunning for IC, or does this mean they thought Enchant was IC?

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:47 pm
by MegAzumarill
NKA may actually be helpful then if that's right.
I don't know if I'm interpreting that right, but my concern would be scum unlikely to aim there anyway

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:02 am
by Looker
Hello, give me six hours

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:31 am
by MegAzumarill
Don't wanna upkeep the subtext so Dwlee I assume you are implying

Because many people reacted in a way that would not makes sense as a response to FB's fake reveal, the people who did not react to it would look more like IC in scum's eyes, but since none of those people were killed they are likely to be scum?

Or I'm reading too much into it