Page 117 of 477

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:51 pm
by catboi
In post 2897, SCP 682 wrote:
In post 2895, catboi wrote:
In post 2884, catboi wrote:
In post 2870, SCP 682 wrote: like

pulling this post kinda out of the air

but its posts like these

with the tone where its like
"hee hee look at me im so friendly trust me please do what i want :)" not like the kind of town way of going about it ?? idk how to explain it its like a kind of tonal thing I've noticed is a pretty consistent scum thing for people who have a more edgy townplay in the sense of being aggro.
okay for real I don't think him making cheeky posts trying to get people to follow him is scum-indicative for him at all given I've seen him talk like that as town
I went and checked open 798 thinking he'd made a post like that but didn't come up with anything on a quick search but I still don't feel like that's a scumtell for him
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... ct[]=32813
I raise you, Open 841
I feel like he context of that game is pretty different since he replaced in at the end of a huge day 1 but it felt like he was afraid to say almost anything, certainly wasn't being cheeky, felt very awkward. Obviously I was informed so my perspective is biased but his posts felt a lot less free-flowing there.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:51 pm
by catboi
In post 2899, Flavor Leaf wrote:almost like meta from 1 game sample is bad or something
gotta admit you have a point there

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:52 pm
by Flavor Leaf
I'll try and case Catboi tomorrow. Like there's a lot at this point.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:53 pm
by Flavor Leaf
it'll give catboi something to go up against since none of my posts theyve been able to since i havent been casing.

actually play some mafia.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:54 pm
by SCP 682
btw if theres anyone in the monastery that is scum it would be StD because theyve been really lowkey and popping in without really engaging both of us but i also suck ass at reading StD and dont think a hood that isn't 1 on 1 would help me.

their post count in there is significantly lower than flavor and I and such and most of their posts there are filler.

just like.

kinda throwing it out there to make sure it doesnt get lost in only the monastery. more of a shoutout to lategamers who wanna reread stuff

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:56 pm
by Wallflower
In post 2904, SCP 682 wrote:btw if theres anyone in the monastery that is scum it would be StD because theyve been really lowkey and popping in without really engaging both of us but i also suck ass at reading StD and dont think a hood that isn't 1 on 1 would help me.

their post count in there is significantly lower than flavor and I and such and most of their posts there are filler.

just like.

kinda throwing it out there to make sure it doesnt get lost in only the monastery. more of a shoutout to lategamers who wanna reread stuff
Why are you voting for me?

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:57 pm
by SCP 682
bc i daycopped you. aligned with mafia

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:58 pm
by Save The Dragons
In post 2904, SCP 682 wrote:btw if theres anyone in the monastery that is scum it would be StD because theyve been really lowkey and popping in without really engaging both of us but i also suck ass at reading StD and dont think a hood that isn't 1 on 1 would help me.

their post count in there is significantly lower than flavor and I and such and most of their posts there are filler.

just like.

kinda throwing it out there to make sure it doesnt get lost in only the monastery. more of a shoutout to lategamers who wanna reread stuff
Did you want my opinion on anything

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:58 pm
by SCP 682
In post 2907, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 2904, SCP 682 wrote:btw if theres anyone in the monastery that is scum it would be StD because theyve been really lowkey and popping in without really engaging both of us but i also suck ass at reading StD and dont think a hood that isn't 1 on 1 would help me.

their post count in there is significantly lower than flavor and I and such and most of their posts there are filler.

just like.

kinda throwing it out there to make sure it doesnt get lost in only the monastery. more of a shoutout to lategamers who wanna reread stuff
Did you want my opinion on anything
no i just wanted to express my paranoia based on ur last post in the monk chat

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:59 pm
by Wallflower
In post 2906, SCP 682 wrote:bc i daycopped you. aligned with mafia
See I know you’re lying because I’m a wolf ;)

AWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:59 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 2905, Wallflower wrote:
In post 2904, SCP 682 wrote:btw if theres anyone in the monastery that is scum it would be StD because theyve been really lowkey and popping in without really engaging both of us but i also suck ass at reading StD and dont think a hood that isn't 1 on 1 would help me.

their post count in there is significantly lower than flavor and I and such and most of their posts there are filler.

just like.

kinda throwing it out there to make sure it doesnt get lost in only the monastery. more of a shoutout to lategamers who wanna reread stuff
Why are you voting for me?

Cuz Catboi appealed to them.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 5:59 pm
by Wallflower
(I’m not actually a werewolf, in case that needs clarificstion)

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:00 pm
by Wallflower
In post 2910, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 2905, Wallflower wrote:
In post 2904, SCP 682 wrote:btw if theres anyone in the monastery that is scum it would be StD because theyve been really lowkey and popping in without really engaging both of us but i also suck ass at reading StD and dont think a hood that isn't 1 on 1 would help me.

their post count in there is significantly lower than flavor and I and such and most of their posts there are filler.

just like.

kinda throwing it out there to make sure it doesnt get lost in only the monastery. more of a shoutout to lategamers who wanna reread stuff
Why are you voting for me?

Cuz Catboi appealed to them.
Catboi doesn’t even think I’m scum though

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:00 pm
by Save The Dragons
In post 2908, SCP 682 wrote:
In post 2907, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 2904, SCP 682 wrote:btw if theres anyone in the monastery that is scum it would be StD because theyve been really lowkey and popping in without really engaging both of us but i also suck ass at reading StD and dont think a hood that isn't 1 on 1 would help me.

their post count in there is significantly lower than flavor and I and such and most of their posts there are filler.

just like.

kinda throwing it out there to make sure it doesnt get lost in only the monastery. more of a shoutout to lategamers who wanna reread stuff
Did you want my opinion on anything
no i just wanted to express my paranoia based on ur last post in the monk chat
It's weird how you vote my scum read and I think about going back there

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:02 pm
by Wallflower
(Btw SCP I still want the real answer)

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:04 pm
by Wallflower
I spent two whole minutes trying to come up with a witty answer. It’s the least you could do

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:04 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 2912, Wallflower wrote:
In post 2910, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 2905, Wallflower wrote:
In post 2904, SCP 682 wrote:btw if theres anyone in the monastery that is scum it would be StD because theyve been really lowkey and popping in without really engaging both of us but i also suck ass at reading StD and dont think a hood that isn't 1 on 1 would help me.

their post count in there is significantly lower than flavor and I and such and most of their posts there are filler.

just like.

kinda throwing it out there to make sure it doesnt get lost in only the monastery. more of a shoutout to lategamers who wanna reread stuff
Why are you voting for me?

Cuz Catboi appealed to them.
Catboi doesn’t even think I’m scum though
They went to you because Catboi appealed to them to try and not scum read them, not necessarily because wallf was pushing you as scum.

I have more thoughts, but i'll give them later when SPC says more about why they pushed you.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:05 pm
by Flavor Leaf
WallFlower/MonkeyMan are my strongest town reads.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:05 pm
by Flavor Leaf
Followed by STD.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:06 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 2672, Flavor Leaf wrote:Catboi-Well Done-Menalque-SCP have scum in them somewhere.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:13 pm
by Toogeloo
UNVOTE:
VOTE: catboi

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:14 pm
by Well Done
catboi mind controlled SCP 682 into voting for Wall Flower

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:17 pm
by catboi
Totally

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:55 pm
by butterchurn
In post 2876, SCP 682 wrote:
In post 2874, butterchurn wrote:You didn't drop the case though, you just went and found another reason. It's the same thing you did with catboi. That's what I find suspicious.
me, having a game up my sleeve where I do exactly this on replace in to case scum after I nailed them
Uh, cool? So you got lucky once. You make up reasons to justify a read, and when that reason is disproven, rather than re-evaluating and adjusting your conclusions, you instead fit new evidence to match the conclusion you already decided on. You understand that's not an effective way of hunting scum, right?
In post 2877, SCP 682 wrote:I will give you tonight to think about how you fucked up trying to come after me in this way.

But also -> the perspective that you think scum need to be making shit up.

i think you are scum for scumfuckily defending another slot I think is tied to you. not because of how I think you are approaching your reads - other than the one on me which is a poor omgus to discredit me.

:) oh boy i feel so giddy having so many caught scum right now in my hands
How can it be an OMGUS when I thought your slot was scum before you entered? You're doing enough to discredit yourself on your own, I don't think you need my help. It's also asinine to suggest that it's invalid to suspect someone for making things up (while accusing me of the same thing, by the way!). Scum who are genuinely hunting scum still need to "find" a wider pool of scum than actually exist. It's related to your criticism of catboi's pool for being too narrow. Scum absolutely do have to fake pushes on people, and additionally, any scum who is just 100% genuinely hunting all the time is absolutely failing at working towards their win condition. Scum should be choosing pushes to advance scum wincon, not just hunting the other faction. There is no doubt in my mind that you
already know this
because you are smart enough to, and that is yet another reason why I know that your reasons here are made up.
In post 2879, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Butter - For what it's worth, they did explain their read pretty well in the monkery, but I do think SPC is falling apart in the game thread.

You've been very fence sitting, and you've been defending both Catboi and myself. I put you in the Catboi Cover Crew even way back when.

I see a very clear obvious link between you and Catboi to the point I specifically don't think it's happening.
It doesn't mean anything to me if they explained their read well in the monastery (well, I guess it means a little, if you and Save the Dragons think it was a genuine case, but still). I want to see their reasons posted in thread because the ones that they've given so far are bad or fabricated. That said, saying that I've been fencesitting on the you/catboi issue is probably pretty accurate. I think it would be irresponsible of me (although very easy if I were scum) to act as if the issue is an easy one to sort.
In post 2882, catboi wrote: Yeah UI mean that's just the problem I think your criticism doesn't change my thinking that much, sorry. "that's just how he plays" doesn't do a lot for me because in general I feel he has a stronger thought process as town where here it felt like the push on mastina was entirely unsavory. Even now, I can see we're getting
absolutely nowhere
with this, so I think you can kind of see why I responded the way I did? I think you're being naive and your counterarguments don't really hold water for me. I'm not obligated keep fighting with you over that read and it doesn't make me scum.
That's fine, we don't have to continue. But this response does much more for me than previous ones, actually, so I think we are getting somewhere.

Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 6:57 pm
by butterchurn
In post 2920, Toogeloo wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: catboi
Your last two posts are joining the Nashville Dreams wagon with a naked vote, and then joining the catboi wagon with a naked vote. Do you have any thoughts to attach to either of those? It would be appreciated.