Mafiascum.net

In post 2867, Titus wrote:Even then, a VT can say there's scum in the slots above me because X wasn't claimed.

In post 2889, Titus wrote:

In post 2883, Aristeia wrote:why would we out the doc to nail enchant

Because Asuka becomes a cop, scum can't fake a PR to suit the situation.

If Enchant is lying, he's likely vengeful. It won't exist in the slots above him.

In post 2868, MathBlade wrote:I can’t calculate that at work

I think that I would prefer both bottom up I think.

That way the bottom have to claim the specific PR first

Then if upper has that PR it’s a definite CC and the CCer is more likely truth telling

The way you have it enables the specific PR claimers to pick from leftovers

In post 2900, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2867, Titus wrote:Even then, a VT can say there's scum in the slots above me because X wasn't claimed.

I'm thinking the PR/VT claim order can be the reverse draft list and the full claims can be based on consensus reads
thoughts?

In post 2897, Titus wrote:

In post 2892, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2888, Save The Dragons wrote:why wouldn't i just claim N3 vig

As I said I think if you’re scum you’re doing the kills

Math he's not claiming the vig. Let it go.

In post 2902, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 2889, Titus wrote:

In post 2883, Aristeia wrote:why would we out the doc to nail enchant

Because Asuka becomes a cop, scum can't fake a PR to suit the situation.

If Enchant is lying, he's likely vengeful. It won't exist in the slots above him.

No one has cc’d him and I still don’t understand why you thought you were shot? I thought you were actually softing bp before Enchant claimed it.

In post 2888, Save The Dragons wrote:why wouldn't i just claim N3 vig

In post 2902, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 2889, Titus wrote:

In post 2883, Aristeia wrote:why would we out the doc to nail enchant

Because Asuka becomes a cop, scum can't fake a PR to suit the situation.

If Enchant is lying, he's likely vengeful. It won't exist in the slots above him.

No one has cc’d him and I still don’t understand why you thought you were shot? I thought you were actually softing bp before Enchant claimed it.

In post 2904, Titus wrote:

In post 2900, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2867, Titus wrote:Even then, a VT can say there's scum in the slots above me because X wasn't claimed.

I'm thinking the PR/VT claim order can be the reverse draft list and the full claims can be based on consensus reads
thoughts?

Not ideal but still works as long as VTs keep their mouths shut about categories until all PRs have claimed.

In post 2907, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2888, Save The Dragons wrote:why wouldn't i just claim N3 vig

idk if it was the case when you clarified for math but he said his pick was vengeful and he didn't get it
that means it's known to be someone else if it's not you, so faking it would be foolish

In post 2910, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 2907, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2888, Save The Dragons wrote:why wouldn't i just claim N3 vig

idk if it was the case when you clarified for math but he said his pick was vengeful and he didn't get it
that means it's known to be someone else if it's not you, so faking it would be foolish

i think math is saying I am the N3 vig and not claiming it for ??? reasons unless i'm mistaken

In post 2913, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2910, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 2907, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2888, Save The Dragons wrote:why wouldn't i just claim N3 vig

idk if it was the case when you clarified for math but he said his pick was vengeful and he didn't get it
that means it's known to be someone else if it's not you, so faking it would be foolish

i think math is saying I am the N3 vig and not claiming it for ??? reasons unless i'm mistaken

I am saying both.

I know from being VT an N3 vig or vengeful exists.

If this pairing isn’t claimed then scum have it

Based on your pew pew pew posts it makes sense to be you.

But in the rare case you’re VT it still exists

In post 2911, Gamma Emerald wrote:afaik enchant doesn't care what pronouns are used for him
but he doesn't like being called "echant"

In post 2916, Save The Dragons wrote:did you want my pairing? i thought that was later but i can give it now

In post 2912, Titus wrote:The only reason someone withholds a category is they're scum banking no one else took it.

Let's just wait on Dwlee PR or VT

In post 2919, Titus wrote:

In post 2916, Save The Dragons wrote:did you want my pairing? i thought that was later but i can give it now

No.

In post 2921, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2919, Titus wrote:

In post 2916, Save The Dragons wrote:did you want my pairing? i thought that was later but i can give it now

No.

I thought that’s what you asked for

In post 2922, Titus wrote:

In post 2921, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2919, Titus wrote:

In post 2916, Save The Dragons wrote:did you want my pairing? i thought that was later but i can give it now

No.

I thought that’s what you asked for

No

1) Claim PR or VT bottom up
2) PRs claim categories top down (but I wouldn't object to consensus first)
3) VTs claim categories